Religious security of the Russian Federation as a reflection object of Philosophy and Religious Studies

The article is devoted to the philosophical aspects of the discourse on religious security on the territory of the Russian Federation, where religious organizations are recognized as one of the possible threats to modern society. The authors of the article prove that the specificity of threats on th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhukov Artem, Bernyukevich Tatyana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821210003
id doaj-1f724a68b66d445586c6e7320e14bf32
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f724a68b66d445586c6e7320e14bf322021-04-02T09:58:22ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-012121000310.1051/matecconf/201821210003matecconf_icre2018_10003Religious security of the Russian Federation as a reflection object of Philosophy and Religious StudiesZhukov Artem0Bernyukevich TatyanaTransbaikal State UniversityThe article is devoted to the philosophical aspects of the discourse on religious security on the territory of the Russian Federation, where religious organizations are recognized as one of the possible threats to modern society. The authors of the article prove that the specificity of threats on the part of religious organizations should be that their motive is to be a doctrine. The article justifies the fact that the commission of unlawful actions by a religious organization is most often justified not by dogma, but by material, secular motives. This leads to the fact that this activity is evaluated in accordance with the degree of harm caused as an extremist one. The novelty of the study is that the authors draw attention to the fact that there are religious associations that are recognized as dangerous, despite the fact that they do not carry out unlawful actions. The degree of danger they represent is determined on the basis of the content of religious texts that are recognized as dangerous if it can be proved that the potential threat contained in them can acquire a real character. The result of the article is the proof that the task of secular religious studies and social philosophy should not be efforts aimed at banning religious organizations that represent not a real threat, but only a potential danger, since the main thing in which these sciences are interested is the development of the theory of social adaptation of religion.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821210003
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhukov Artem
Bernyukevich Tatyana
spellingShingle Zhukov Artem
Bernyukevich Tatyana
Religious security of the Russian Federation as a reflection object of Philosophy and Religious Studies
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Zhukov Artem
Bernyukevich Tatyana
author_sort Zhukov Artem
title Religious security of the Russian Federation as a reflection object of Philosophy and Religious Studies
title_short Religious security of the Russian Federation as a reflection object of Philosophy and Religious Studies
title_full Religious security of the Russian Federation as a reflection object of Philosophy and Religious Studies
title_fullStr Religious security of the Russian Federation as a reflection object of Philosophy and Religious Studies
title_full_unstemmed Religious security of the Russian Federation as a reflection object of Philosophy and Religious Studies
title_sort religious security of the russian federation as a reflection object of philosophy and religious studies
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The article is devoted to the philosophical aspects of the discourse on religious security on the territory of the Russian Federation, where religious organizations are recognized as one of the possible threats to modern society. The authors of the article prove that the specificity of threats on the part of religious organizations should be that their motive is to be a doctrine. The article justifies the fact that the commission of unlawful actions by a religious organization is most often justified not by dogma, but by material, secular motives. This leads to the fact that this activity is evaluated in accordance with the degree of harm caused as an extremist one. The novelty of the study is that the authors draw attention to the fact that there are religious associations that are recognized as dangerous, despite the fact that they do not carry out unlawful actions. The degree of danger they represent is determined on the basis of the content of religious texts that are recognized as dangerous if it can be proved that the potential threat contained in them can acquire a real character. The result of the article is the proof that the task of secular religious studies and social philosophy should not be efforts aimed at banning religious organizations that represent not a real threat, but only a potential danger, since the main thing in which these sciences are interested is the development of the theory of social adaptation of religion.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821210003
work_keys_str_mv AT zhukovartem religioussecurityoftherussianfederationasareflectionobjectofphilosophyandreligiousstudies
AT bernyukevichtatyana religioussecurityoftherussianfederationasareflectionobjectofphilosophyandreligiousstudies
_version_ 1724168162935570432