Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a useful tool for assessing the functioning and disability of the general population as well as the effectiveness of the applied interventions. Until this study, n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka Bejer, Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Alessandro de Sire, Renata Spalek, Bernard Sozański
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
ICF
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7284
id doaj-1f6e819a037848858e98f4d8518c5cd3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f6e819a037848858e98f4d8518c5cd32020-11-25T04:00:30ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-10-01177284728410.3390/ijerph17197284Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back PainAgnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska0Agnieszka Bejer1Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej2Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska3Alessandro de Sire4Renata Spalek5Bernard Sozański6Institute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences of the University of Rzeszow, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences of the University of Rzeszow, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences of the University of Rzeszow, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandFaculty of Medicine, Lazarski University, Świeradowska Street 43, 02-662 Warsaw, PolandPhysical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Viale Piazza D’Armi 1, 28100 Novara, ItalyDepartment of Geriatrics, Neurosciences, Orthopedics, Center for Geriatric Medicine (CEMI), Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, L.go F.Vito 8, 00168 Rome, ItalyInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences of the University of Rzeszow, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana16C, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandThe World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a useful tool for assessing the functioning and disability of the general population as well as the effectiveness of the applied interventions. Until this study, no data regarding the validity of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in chronic low back pain (LBP) in Poland have been explored. This study was conducted on 92 patients suffering from chronic LBP admitted to the rehabilitation ward. The Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0, the Sf-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaires were applied to assess patients. The scale score reliability of the entire tool for the study population was very high. The Cronbach’s alpha test result for the entire scale was 0.92. For the overall result of the WHODAS 2.0, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC<sub>1,2</sub>) was 0.928, which confirmed that the scale was consistent over time. The total result and the vast majority of domains of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 correlated negatively with domains of the SF-36 questionnaire; thus, a higher WHODAS 2.0 score was associated with a lower score on the SF-36 questionnaire. We found that the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the total WHODAS 2.0 score in patients after rehabilitation for LBP was 4.87. Overall, the results indicated that the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS is suitable for assessing health and disability status in patients with LBP.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7284ICFdisabilitylow back painrehabilitationvalidityreliability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
Agnieszka Bejer
Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej
Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska
Alessandro de Sire
Renata Spalek
Bernard Sozański
spellingShingle Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
Agnieszka Bejer
Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej
Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska
Alessandro de Sire
Renata Spalek
Bernard Sozański
Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
ICF
disability
low back pain
rehabilitation
validity
reliability
author_facet Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
Agnieszka Bejer
Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej
Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska
Alessandro de Sire
Renata Spalek
Bernard Sozański
author_sort Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
title Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
title_short Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
title_full Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
title_fullStr Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
title_sort psychometric properties of the polish version of the 36-item whodas 2.0 in patients with low back pain
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2020-10-01
description The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a useful tool for assessing the functioning and disability of the general population as well as the effectiveness of the applied interventions. Until this study, no data regarding the validity of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in chronic low back pain (LBP) in Poland have been explored. This study was conducted on 92 patients suffering from chronic LBP admitted to the rehabilitation ward. The Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0, the Sf-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaires were applied to assess patients. The scale score reliability of the entire tool for the study population was very high. The Cronbach’s alpha test result for the entire scale was 0.92. For the overall result of the WHODAS 2.0, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC<sub>1,2</sub>) was 0.928, which confirmed that the scale was consistent over time. The total result and the vast majority of domains of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 correlated negatively with domains of the SF-36 questionnaire; thus, a higher WHODAS 2.0 score was associated with a lower score on the SF-36 questionnaire. We found that the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the total WHODAS 2.0 score in patients after rehabilitation for LBP was 4.87. Overall, the results indicated that the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS is suitable for assessing health and disability status in patients with LBP.
topic ICF
disability
low back pain
rehabilitation
validity
reliability
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7284
work_keys_str_mv AT agnieszkacwirlejsozanska psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain
AT agnieszkabejer psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain
AT agnieszkawisniowskaszurlej psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain
AT annawilmowskapietruszynska psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain
AT alessandrodesire psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain
AT renataspalek psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain
AT bernardsozanski psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain
_version_ 1724450227507691520