Thinking Inside the Box: Simple Methods to Evaluate Complex Treatments

We risk ignoring cheaper and safer medical treatments because they cannot be patented, lack profit potential, require too much patient-contact time, or do not have scientific results. Novel medical treatments may be difficult to evaluate for a variety of reasons such as patient selection bias, the e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. Michael Menke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Libraries 2011-10-01
Series:Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jmmss/article/view/12365
Description
Summary:We risk ignoring cheaper and safer medical treatments because they cannot be patented, lack profit potential, require too much patient-contact time, or do not have scientific results. Novel medical treatments may be difficult to evaluate for a variety of reasons such as patient selection bias, the effect of the package of care, or the lack of identifying the active elements of treatment. Whole Systems Research (WSR) is an approach designed to assess the performance of complete packages of clinical management. While the WSR method is compelling, there is no standard procedure for WSR, and its implementation may be intimidating. The truth is that WSR methodological tools are neither new nor complicated. There are two sequential steps, or boxes, that guide WSR methodology: establishing system predictability, followed by an audit of system element effectiveness. We describe the implementation of WSR with a particular attention to threats to validity (Shadish, Cook, Campbell, 2002; Shadish Heinsman, 1997).   DOI:10.2458/azu_jmmss_v2i1_menke
ISSN:2159-7855