A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells

Clusters of regularly spaced direct repeats, separated by unconserved spacer sequences, are ubiquitous in archaeal chromosomes and occur in some plasmids. Some clusters constitute around 1% of chromosomal DNA. Similarly structured clusters, generally smaller, also occur in some bacterial chromosomes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reidun Lillestøl, Peter Redder, Roger A. Garrett, Kim Brügger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2006-01-01
Series:Archaea
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2006/542818
id doaj-1f5b0fcf47c94dd4ae651d06764bbf0a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f5b0fcf47c94dd4ae651d06764bbf0a2021-07-02T10:08:43ZengHindawi LimitedArchaea1472-36461472-36542006-01-0121597210.1155/2006/542818A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cellsReidun Lillestøl0Peter Redder1Roger A. Garrett2Kim Brügger3Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83H, DK1307 Copenhagen K, DenmarkInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83H, DK1307 Copenhagen K, DenmarkInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83H, DK1307 Copenhagen K, DenmarkInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83H, DK1307 Copenhagen K, DenmarkClusters of regularly spaced direct repeats, separated by unconserved spacer sequences, are ubiquitous in archaeal chromosomes and occur in some plasmids. Some clusters constitute around 1% of chromosomal DNA. Similarly structured clusters, generally smaller, also occur in some bacterial chromosomes. Although early studies implicated these clusters in segregation/partition functions, recent evidence suggests that the spacer sequences derive from extrachromosomal elements, and, primarily, viruses. This has led to the proposal that the clusters provide a defence against viral propagation in cells, and that both the mode of inhibition of viral propagation and the mechanism of adding spacer-repeat units to clusters, are dependent on RNAs transcribed from the clusters. Moreover, the putative inhibitory apparatus (piRNA-based) may be evolutionarily related to the interference RNA systems (siRNA and miRNA), which are common in eukarya. Here, we analyze all the current data on archaeal repeat clusters and provide some new insights into their diverse structures, transcriptional properties and mode of structural development. The results are consistent with larger cluster transcripts being processed at the centers of the repeat sequences and being further trimmed by exonucleases to yield a dominant, intracellular RNA species, which corresponds approximately to the size of a spacer. Furthermore, analysis of the extensive clusters of Sulfolobus solfataricus strains P1 and P2B provides support for the presence of a flanking sequence adjoining a cluster being a prerequisite for the incorporation of new spacer-repeat units, which occurs between the flanking sequence and the cluster. An archaeal database summarizing the data will be maintained at http://dac.molbio.ku.dk/dbs/SRSR/.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2006/542818
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reidun Lillestøl
Peter Redder
Roger A. Garrett
Kim Brügger
spellingShingle Reidun Lillestøl
Peter Redder
Roger A. Garrett
Kim Brügger
A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells
Archaea
author_facet Reidun Lillestøl
Peter Redder
Roger A. Garrett
Kim Brügger
author_sort Reidun Lillestøl
title A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells
title_short A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells
title_full A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells
title_fullStr A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells
title_full_unstemmed A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells
title_sort putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Archaea
issn 1472-3646
1472-3654
publishDate 2006-01-01
description Clusters of regularly spaced direct repeats, separated by unconserved spacer sequences, are ubiquitous in archaeal chromosomes and occur in some plasmids. Some clusters constitute around 1% of chromosomal DNA. Similarly structured clusters, generally smaller, also occur in some bacterial chromosomes. Although early studies implicated these clusters in segregation/partition functions, recent evidence suggests that the spacer sequences derive from extrachromosomal elements, and, primarily, viruses. This has led to the proposal that the clusters provide a defence against viral propagation in cells, and that both the mode of inhibition of viral propagation and the mechanism of adding spacer-repeat units to clusters, are dependent on RNAs transcribed from the clusters. Moreover, the putative inhibitory apparatus (piRNA-based) may be evolutionarily related to the interference RNA systems (siRNA and miRNA), which are common in eukarya. Here, we analyze all the current data on archaeal repeat clusters and provide some new insights into their diverse structures, transcriptional properties and mode of structural development. The results are consistent with larger cluster transcripts being processed at the centers of the repeat sequences and being further trimmed by exonucleases to yield a dominant, intracellular RNA species, which corresponds approximately to the size of a spacer. Furthermore, analysis of the extensive clusters of Sulfolobus solfataricus strains P1 and P2B provides support for the presence of a flanking sequence adjoining a cluster being a prerequisite for the incorporation of new spacer-repeat units, which occurs between the flanking sequence and the cluster. An archaeal database summarizing the data will be maintained at http://dac.molbio.ku.dk/dbs/SRSR/.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2006/542818
work_keys_str_mv AT reidunlillestøl aputativeviraldefencemechanisminarchaealcells
AT peterredder aputativeviraldefencemechanisminarchaealcells
AT rogeragarrett aputativeviraldefencemechanisminarchaealcells
AT kimbrugger aputativeviraldefencemechanisminarchaealcells
AT reidunlillestøl putativeviraldefencemechanisminarchaealcells
AT peterredder putativeviraldefencemechanisminarchaealcells
AT rogeragarrett putativeviraldefencemechanisminarchaealcells
AT kimbrugger putativeviraldefencemechanisminarchaealcells
_version_ 1721332305495064576