Cholesteryl esters of saturated fatty acids: cosolubility and fractionation of binary mixtures

Factors affecting the solid state miscibility of saturated chain cholesteryl esters were determined from electron diffraction and differential scanning calorimetric measurements on a homologous series which included two types of crystal packing. Electron diffraction patterns from solution- and epita...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D L Dorset
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 1987-08-01
Series:Journal of Lipid Research
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520386405
id doaj-1f576d3eb461459aaa01fe023b4b8a25
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f576d3eb461459aaa01fe023b4b8a252021-04-25T04:20:17ZengElsevierJournal of Lipid Research0022-22751987-08-012889931005Cholesteryl esters of saturated fatty acids: cosolubility and fractionation of binary mixturesD L Dorset0Electron Diffraction Department, Medical Foundation of Buffalo, Inc., NY 14203.Factors affecting the solid state miscibility of saturated chain cholesteryl esters were determined from electron diffraction and differential scanning calorimetric measurements on a homologous series which included two types of crystal packing. Electron diffraction patterns from solution- and epitaxially crystallized microcrystals gave measured unit cell constants consistent with the bilayer crystal form for myristate, pentadecanoate, palmitate, and stearate esters. Cholesteryl undecanoate crystallized as the monolayer I structure and cholesteryl laurate was polymorphic, packing in either monolayer I or bilayer forms. No evidence was found for the monolayer II form of the laurate claimed in earlier work. It is clear that solid solution formation follows general rules formulated earlier by Kitaigorodskii for molecular crystals. A symmetry criterion must be satisfied first of all, i.e., two compounds that solidify in greatly different crystal structures will not form continuous solid solutions (e.g., cholesteryl undecanoate/cholesteryl myristate). Within a given crystal structure type, solid solution is permitted when the molecular volumes are similar. (For example, cholesteryl myristate forms an ideal solid solution with cholesteryl pentadecanoate, a nonideal solution with cholesteryl palmitate, and a eutectic of solid solutions with cholesteryl stearate.) For the polymorphic cholesteryl laurate, solid solutions of either the monolayer I structure (e.g., with cholesteryl undecanoate) or bilayer structure (e.g., with cholesteryl myristate) are permitted.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520386405
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D L Dorset
spellingShingle D L Dorset
Cholesteryl esters of saturated fatty acids: cosolubility and fractionation of binary mixtures
Journal of Lipid Research
author_facet D L Dorset
author_sort D L Dorset
title Cholesteryl esters of saturated fatty acids: cosolubility and fractionation of binary mixtures
title_short Cholesteryl esters of saturated fatty acids: cosolubility and fractionation of binary mixtures
title_full Cholesteryl esters of saturated fatty acids: cosolubility and fractionation of binary mixtures
title_fullStr Cholesteryl esters of saturated fatty acids: cosolubility and fractionation of binary mixtures
title_full_unstemmed Cholesteryl esters of saturated fatty acids: cosolubility and fractionation of binary mixtures
title_sort cholesteryl esters of saturated fatty acids: cosolubility and fractionation of binary mixtures
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Lipid Research
issn 0022-2275
publishDate 1987-08-01
description Factors affecting the solid state miscibility of saturated chain cholesteryl esters were determined from electron diffraction and differential scanning calorimetric measurements on a homologous series which included two types of crystal packing. Electron diffraction patterns from solution- and epitaxially crystallized microcrystals gave measured unit cell constants consistent with the bilayer crystal form for myristate, pentadecanoate, palmitate, and stearate esters. Cholesteryl undecanoate crystallized as the monolayer I structure and cholesteryl laurate was polymorphic, packing in either monolayer I or bilayer forms. No evidence was found for the monolayer II form of the laurate claimed in earlier work. It is clear that solid solution formation follows general rules formulated earlier by Kitaigorodskii for molecular crystals. A symmetry criterion must be satisfied first of all, i.e., two compounds that solidify in greatly different crystal structures will not form continuous solid solutions (e.g., cholesteryl undecanoate/cholesteryl myristate). Within a given crystal structure type, solid solution is permitted when the molecular volumes are similar. (For example, cholesteryl myristate forms an ideal solid solution with cholesteryl pentadecanoate, a nonideal solution with cholesteryl palmitate, and a eutectic of solid solutions with cholesteryl stearate.) For the polymorphic cholesteryl laurate, solid solutions of either the monolayer I structure (e.g., with cholesteryl undecanoate) or bilayer structure (e.g., with cholesteryl myristate) are permitted.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520386405
work_keys_str_mv AT dldorset cholesterylestersofsaturatedfattyacidscosolubilityandfractionationofbinarymixtures
_version_ 1721510400771489792