Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches.

Synchronization or phase-locking between oscillating neuronal groups is considered to be important for coordination of information among cortical networks. Spectral coherence is a commonly used approach to quantify phase locking between neural signals. We systematically explored the validity of spec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric Lowet, Mark J Roberts, Pietro Bonizzi, Joël Karel, Peter De Weerd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4706353?pdf=render
id doaj-1f4b0a5ef22047d0b0c2b74a6aff7950
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f4b0a5ef22047d0b0c2b74a6aff79502020-11-25T02:25:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014644310.1371/journal.pone.0146443Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches.Eric LowetMark J RobertsPietro BonizziJoël KarelPeter De WeerdSynchronization or phase-locking between oscillating neuronal groups is considered to be important for coordination of information among cortical networks. Spectral coherence is a commonly used approach to quantify phase locking between neural signals. We systematically explored the validity of spectral coherence measures for quantifying synchronization among neural oscillators. To that aim, we simulated coupled oscillatory signals that exhibited synchronization dynamics using an abstract phase-oscillator model as well as interacting gamma-generating spiking neural networks. We found that, within a large parameter range, the spectral coherence measure deviated substantially from the expected phase-locking. Moreover, spectral coherence did not converge to the expected value with increasing signal-to-noise ratio. We found that spectral coherence particularly failed when oscillators were in the partially (intermittent) synchronized state, which we expect to be the most likely state for neural synchronization. The failure was due to the fast frequency and amplitude changes induced by synchronization forces. We then investigated whether spectral coherence reflected the information flow among networks measured by transfer entropy (TE) of spike trains. We found that spectral coherence failed to robustly reflect changes in synchrony-mediated information flow between neural networks in many instances. As an alternative approach we explored a phase-locking value (PLV) method based on the reconstruction of the instantaneous phase. As one approach for reconstructing instantaneous phase, we used the Hilbert Transform (HT) preceded by Singular Spectrum Decomposition (SSD) of the signal. PLV estimates have broad applicability as they do not rely on stationarity, and, unlike spectral coherence, they enable more accurate estimations of oscillatory synchronization across a wide range of different synchronization regimes, and better tracking of synchronization-mediated information flow among networks.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4706353?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eric Lowet
Mark J Roberts
Pietro Bonizzi
Joël Karel
Peter De Weerd
spellingShingle Eric Lowet
Mark J Roberts
Pietro Bonizzi
Joël Karel
Peter De Weerd
Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Eric Lowet
Mark J Roberts
Pietro Bonizzi
Joël Karel
Peter De Weerd
author_sort Eric Lowet
title Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches.
title_short Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches.
title_full Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches.
title_fullStr Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches.
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches.
title_sort quantifying neural oscillatory synchronization: a comparison between spectral coherence and phase-locking value approaches.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Synchronization or phase-locking between oscillating neuronal groups is considered to be important for coordination of information among cortical networks. Spectral coherence is a commonly used approach to quantify phase locking between neural signals. We systematically explored the validity of spectral coherence measures for quantifying synchronization among neural oscillators. To that aim, we simulated coupled oscillatory signals that exhibited synchronization dynamics using an abstract phase-oscillator model as well as interacting gamma-generating spiking neural networks. We found that, within a large parameter range, the spectral coherence measure deviated substantially from the expected phase-locking. Moreover, spectral coherence did not converge to the expected value with increasing signal-to-noise ratio. We found that spectral coherence particularly failed when oscillators were in the partially (intermittent) synchronized state, which we expect to be the most likely state for neural synchronization. The failure was due to the fast frequency and amplitude changes induced by synchronization forces. We then investigated whether spectral coherence reflected the information flow among networks measured by transfer entropy (TE) of spike trains. We found that spectral coherence failed to robustly reflect changes in synchrony-mediated information flow between neural networks in many instances. As an alternative approach we explored a phase-locking value (PLV) method based on the reconstruction of the instantaneous phase. As one approach for reconstructing instantaneous phase, we used the Hilbert Transform (HT) preceded by Singular Spectrum Decomposition (SSD) of the signal. PLV estimates have broad applicability as they do not rely on stationarity, and, unlike spectral coherence, they enable more accurate estimations of oscillatory synchronization across a wide range of different synchronization regimes, and better tracking of synchronization-mediated information flow among networks.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4706353?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ericlowet quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches
AT markjroberts quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches
AT pietrobonizzi quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches
AT joelkarel quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches
AT peterdeweerd quantifyingneuraloscillatorysynchronizationacomparisonbetweenspectralcoherenceandphaselockingvalueapproaches
_version_ 1724853181304799232