Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign

Establishing the relationship between marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosols and surface water biogeochemistry is required to understand aerosol and cloud production processes over the remote ocean and represent them more accurately in earth system models and global climate projections. This was a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. S. Law, M. J. Smith, M. J. Harvey, T. G. Bell, L. T. Cravigan, F. C. Elliott, S. J. Lawson, M. Lizotte, A. Marriner, J. McGregor, Z. Ristovski, K. A. Safi, E. S. Saltzman, P. Vaattovaara, C. F. Walker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-11-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/13645/2017/acp-17-13645-2017.pdf
id doaj-1f3cfcda1f444ad5a1448f747b9cda5a
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. S. Law
C. S. Law
M. J. Smith
M. J. Harvey
T. G. Bell
T. G. Bell
L. T. Cravigan
L. T. Cravigan
F. C. Elliott
S. J. Lawson
M. Lizotte
A. Marriner
J. McGregor
Z. Ristovski
K. A. Safi
E. S. Saltzman
P. Vaattovaara
C. F. Walker
spellingShingle C. S. Law
C. S. Law
M. J. Smith
M. J. Harvey
T. G. Bell
T. G. Bell
L. T. Cravigan
L. T. Cravigan
F. C. Elliott
S. J. Lawson
M. Lizotte
A. Marriner
J. McGregor
Z. Ristovski
K. A. Safi
E. S. Saltzman
P. Vaattovaara
C. F. Walker
Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet C. S. Law
C. S. Law
M. J. Smith
M. J. Harvey
T. G. Bell
T. G. Bell
L. T. Cravigan
L. T. Cravigan
F. C. Elliott
S. J. Lawson
M. Lizotte
A. Marriner
J. McGregor
Z. Ristovski
K. A. Safi
E. S. Saltzman
P. Vaattovaara
C. F. Walker
author_sort C. S. Law
title Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign
title_short Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign
title_full Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign
title_fullStr Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign
title_full_unstemmed Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign
title_sort overview and preliminary results of the surface ocean aerosol production (soap) campaign
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Establishing the relationship between marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosols and surface water biogeochemistry is required to understand aerosol and cloud production processes over the remote ocean and represent them more accurately in earth system models and global climate projections. This was addressed by the SOAP (Surface Ocean Aerosol Production) campaign, which examined air–sea interaction over biologically productive frontal waters east of New Zealand. This overview details the objectives, regional context, sampling strategy and provisional findings of a pilot study, PreSOAP, in austral summer 2011 and the following SOAP voyage in late austral summer 2012. Both voyages characterized surface water and MBL composition in three phytoplankton blooms of differing species composition and biogeochemistry, with significant regional correlation observed between chlorophyll <i>a</i> and DMSsw. Surface seawater dimethylsulfide (DMSsw) and associated air–sea DMS flux showed spatial variation during the SOAP voyage, with maxima of 25 nmol L<sup>−1</sup> and 100 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, recorded in a dinoflagellate bloom. Inclusion of SOAP data in a regional DMSsw compilation indicates that the current climatological mean is an underestimate for this region of the southwest Pacific. Estimation of the DMS gas transfer velocity (<i>k</i><sub>DMS</sub>) by independent techniques of eddy covariance and gradient flux showed good agreement, although both exhibited periodic deviations from model estimates. Flux anomalies were related to surface warming and sea surface microlayer enrichment and also reflected the heterogeneous distribution of DMSsw and the associated flux footprint. Other aerosol precursors measured included the halides and various volatile organic carbon compounds, with first measurements of the short-lived gases glyoxal and methylglyoxal in pristine Southern Ocean marine air indicating an unidentified local source. The application of a real-time clean sector, contaminant markers and a common aerosol inlet facilitated multi-sensor measurement of uncontaminated air. Aerosol characterization identified variable Aitken mode and consistent submicron-sized accumulation and coarse modes. Submicron aerosol mass was dominated by secondary particles containing ammonium sulfate/bisulfate under light winds, with an increase in sea salt under higher wind speeds. MBL measurements and chamber experiments identified a significant organic component in primary and secondary aerosols. Comparison of SOAP aerosol number and size distributions reveals an underprediction in GLOMAP (GLObal Model of Aerosol Processes)-mode aerosol number in clean marine air masses, suggesting a missing marine aerosol source in the model. The SOAP data will be further examined for evidence of nucleation events and also to identify relationships between MBL composition and surface ocean biogeochemistry that may provide potential proxies for aerosol precursors and production.
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/13645/2017/acp-17-13645-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cslaw overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT cslaw overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT mjsmith overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT mjharvey overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT tgbell overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT tgbell overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT ltcravigan overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT ltcravigan overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT fcelliott overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT sjlawson overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT mlizotte overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT amarriner overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT jmcgregor overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT zristovski overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT kasafi overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT essaltzman overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT pvaattovaara overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
AT cfwalker overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign
_version_ 1716786511701082112
spelling doaj-1f3cfcda1f444ad5a1448f747b9cda5a2020-11-24T20:58:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242017-11-0117136451366710.5194/acp-17-13645-2017Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaignC. S. Law0C. S. Law1M. J. Smith2M. J. Harvey3T. G. Bell4T. G. Bell5L. T. Cravigan6L. T. Cravigan7F. C. Elliott8S. J. Lawson9M. Lizotte10A. Marriner11J. McGregor12Z. Ristovski13K. A. Safi14E. S. Saltzman15P. Vaattovaara16C. F. Walker17National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandDepartment of Chemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, UKDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USAClimate Science Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Aspendale, AustraliaInternational Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, AustraliaNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship, Aspendale, AustraliaDepartment of Biology (Québec-Océan), Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, CanadaNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandInternational Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, AustraliaNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New ZealandDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USAUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FinlandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandEstablishing the relationship between marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosols and surface water biogeochemistry is required to understand aerosol and cloud production processes over the remote ocean and represent them more accurately in earth system models and global climate projections. This was addressed by the SOAP (Surface Ocean Aerosol Production) campaign, which examined air–sea interaction over biologically productive frontal waters east of New Zealand. This overview details the objectives, regional context, sampling strategy and provisional findings of a pilot study, PreSOAP, in austral summer 2011 and the following SOAP voyage in late austral summer 2012. Both voyages characterized surface water and MBL composition in three phytoplankton blooms of differing species composition and biogeochemistry, with significant regional correlation observed between chlorophyll <i>a</i> and DMSsw. Surface seawater dimethylsulfide (DMSsw) and associated air–sea DMS flux showed spatial variation during the SOAP voyage, with maxima of 25 nmol L<sup>−1</sup> and 100 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, recorded in a dinoflagellate bloom. Inclusion of SOAP data in a regional DMSsw compilation indicates that the current climatological mean is an underestimate for this region of the southwest Pacific. Estimation of the DMS gas transfer velocity (<i>k</i><sub>DMS</sub>) by independent techniques of eddy covariance and gradient flux showed good agreement, although both exhibited periodic deviations from model estimates. Flux anomalies were related to surface warming and sea surface microlayer enrichment and also reflected the heterogeneous distribution of DMSsw and the associated flux footprint. Other aerosol precursors measured included the halides and various volatile organic carbon compounds, with first measurements of the short-lived gases glyoxal and methylglyoxal in pristine Southern Ocean marine air indicating an unidentified local source. The application of a real-time clean sector, contaminant markers and a common aerosol inlet facilitated multi-sensor measurement of uncontaminated air. Aerosol characterization identified variable Aitken mode and consistent submicron-sized accumulation and coarse modes. Submicron aerosol mass was dominated by secondary particles containing ammonium sulfate/bisulfate under light winds, with an increase in sea salt under higher wind speeds. MBL measurements and chamber experiments identified a significant organic component in primary and secondary aerosols. Comparison of SOAP aerosol number and size distributions reveals an underprediction in GLOMAP (GLObal Model of Aerosol Processes)-mode aerosol number in clean marine air masses, suggesting a missing marine aerosol source in the model. The SOAP data will be further examined for evidence of nucleation events and also to identify relationships between MBL composition and surface ocean biogeochemistry that may provide potential proxies for aerosol precursors and production.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/13645/2017/acp-17-13645-2017.pdf