Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign
Establishing the relationship between marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosols and surface water biogeochemistry is required to understand aerosol and cloud production processes over the remote ocean and represent them more accurately in earth system models and global climate projections. This was a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/13645/2017/acp-17-13645-2017.pdf |
id |
doaj-1f3cfcda1f444ad5a1448f747b9cda5a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
C. S. Law C. S. Law M. J. Smith M. J. Harvey T. G. Bell T. G. Bell L. T. Cravigan L. T. Cravigan F. C. Elliott S. J. Lawson M. Lizotte A. Marriner J. McGregor Z. Ristovski K. A. Safi E. S. Saltzman P. Vaattovaara C. F. Walker |
spellingShingle |
C. S. Law C. S. Law M. J. Smith M. J. Harvey T. G. Bell T. G. Bell L. T. Cravigan L. T. Cravigan F. C. Elliott S. J. Lawson M. Lizotte A. Marriner J. McGregor Z. Ristovski K. A. Safi E. S. Saltzman P. Vaattovaara C. F. Walker Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
author_facet |
C. S. Law C. S. Law M. J. Smith M. J. Harvey T. G. Bell T. G. Bell L. T. Cravigan L. T. Cravigan F. C. Elliott S. J. Lawson M. Lizotte A. Marriner J. McGregor Z. Ristovski K. A. Safi E. S. Saltzman P. Vaattovaara C. F. Walker |
author_sort |
C. S. Law |
title |
Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign |
title_short |
Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign |
title_full |
Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign |
title_fullStr |
Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign |
title_full_unstemmed |
Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign |
title_sort |
overview and preliminary results of the surface ocean aerosol production (soap) campaign |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
issn |
1680-7316 1680-7324 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
Establishing the relationship between marine boundary layer (MBL)
aerosols and surface water biogeochemistry is required to understand aerosol
and cloud production processes over the remote ocean and represent them
more accurately in earth system models and global climate projections. This
was addressed by the SOAP (Surface Ocean Aerosol Production) campaign, which
examined air–sea interaction over biologically productive frontal waters
east of New Zealand. This overview details the objectives, regional context,
sampling strategy and provisional findings of a pilot study, PreSOAP, in
austral summer 2011 and the following SOAP voyage in late austral summer
2012. Both voyages characterized surface water and MBL composition in three
phytoplankton blooms of differing species composition and biogeochemistry,
with significant regional correlation observed between chlorophyll <i>a</i> and
DMSsw. Surface seawater dimethylsulfide (DMSsw) and associated air–sea DMS
flux showed spatial variation during the SOAP voyage, with maxima of 25 nmol L<sup>−1</sup> and 100 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, recorded
in a dinoflagellate bloom. Inclusion of SOAP data in a regional DMSsw
compilation indicates that the current climatological mean is an
underestimate for this region of the southwest Pacific. Estimation of the
DMS gas transfer velocity (<i>k</i><sub>DMS</sub>) by independent techniques of eddy
covariance and gradient flux showed good agreement, although both exhibited
periodic deviations from model estimates. Flux anomalies were related to
surface warming and sea surface microlayer enrichment and also reflected
the heterogeneous distribution of DMSsw and the associated flux footprint.
Other aerosol precursors measured included the halides and various volatile
organic carbon compounds, with first measurements of the short-lived gases
glyoxal and methylglyoxal in pristine Southern Ocean marine air indicating
an unidentified local source. The application of a real-time clean sector,
contaminant markers and a common aerosol inlet facilitated multi-sensor
measurement of uncontaminated air. Aerosol characterization identified
variable Aitken mode and consistent submicron-sized accumulation and
coarse modes. Submicron aerosol mass was dominated by secondary particles
containing ammonium sulfate/bisulfate under light winds, with an increase in
sea salt under higher wind speeds. MBL measurements and chamber experiments
identified a significant organic component in primary and secondary
aerosols. Comparison of SOAP aerosol number and size distributions reveals
an underprediction in GLOMAP (GLObal Model of Aerosol Processes)-mode aerosol number in clean marine air masses,
suggesting a missing marine aerosol source in the model. The SOAP data will
be further examined for evidence of nucleation events and also to identify
relationships between MBL composition and surface ocean biogeochemistry that
may provide potential proxies for aerosol precursors and production. |
url |
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/13645/2017/acp-17-13645-2017.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cslaw overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT cslaw overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT mjsmith overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT mjharvey overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT tgbell overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT tgbell overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT ltcravigan overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT ltcravigan overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT fcelliott overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT sjlawson overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT mlizotte overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT amarriner overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT jmcgregor overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT zristovski overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT kasafi overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT essaltzman overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT pvaattovaara overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign AT cfwalker overviewandpreliminaryresultsofthesurfaceoceanaerosolproductionsoapcampaign |
_version_ |
1716786511701082112 |
spelling |
doaj-1f3cfcda1f444ad5a1448f747b9cda5a2020-11-24T20:58:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242017-11-0117136451366710.5194/acp-17-13645-2017Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaignC. S. Law0C. S. Law1M. J. Smith2M. J. Harvey3T. G. Bell4T. G. Bell5L. T. Cravigan6L. T. Cravigan7F. C. Elliott8S. J. Lawson9M. Lizotte10A. Marriner11J. McGregor12Z. Ristovski13K. A. Safi14E. S. Saltzman15P. Vaattovaara16C. F. Walker17National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandDepartment of Chemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, UKDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USAClimate Science Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Aspendale, AustraliaInternational Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, AustraliaNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship, Aspendale, AustraliaDepartment of Biology (Québec-Océan), Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, CanadaNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandInternational Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, AustraliaNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New ZealandDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USAUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FinlandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New ZealandEstablishing the relationship between marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosols and surface water biogeochemistry is required to understand aerosol and cloud production processes over the remote ocean and represent them more accurately in earth system models and global climate projections. This was addressed by the SOAP (Surface Ocean Aerosol Production) campaign, which examined air–sea interaction over biologically productive frontal waters east of New Zealand. This overview details the objectives, regional context, sampling strategy and provisional findings of a pilot study, PreSOAP, in austral summer 2011 and the following SOAP voyage in late austral summer 2012. Both voyages characterized surface water and MBL composition in three phytoplankton blooms of differing species composition and biogeochemistry, with significant regional correlation observed between chlorophyll <i>a</i> and DMSsw. Surface seawater dimethylsulfide (DMSsw) and associated air–sea DMS flux showed spatial variation during the SOAP voyage, with maxima of 25 nmol L<sup>−1</sup> and 100 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, recorded in a dinoflagellate bloom. Inclusion of SOAP data in a regional DMSsw compilation indicates that the current climatological mean is an underestimate for this region of the southwest Pacific. Estimation of the DMS gas transfer velocity (<i>k</i><sub>DMS</sub>) by independent techniques of eddy covariance and gradient flux showed good agreement, although both exhibited periodic deviations from model estimates. Flux anomalies were related to surface warming and sea surface microlayer enrichment and also reflected the heterogeneous distribution of DMSsw and the associated flux footprint. Other aerosol precursors measured included the halides and various volatile organic carbon compounds, with first measurements of the short-lived gases glyoxal and methylglyoxal in pristine Southern Ocean marine air indicating an unidentified local source. The application of a real-time clean sector, contaminant markers and a common aerosol inlet facilitated multi-sensor measurement of uncontaminated air. Aerosol characterization identified variable Aitken mode and consistent submicron-sized accumulation and coarse modes. Submicron aerosol mass was dominated by secondary particles containing ammonium sulfate/bisulfate under light winds, with an increase in sea salt under higher wind speeds. MBL measurements and chamber experiments identified a significant organic component in primary and secondary aerosols. Comparison of SOAP aerosol number and size distributions reveals an underprediction in GLOMAP (GLObal Model of Aerosol Processes)-mode aerosol number in clean marine air masses, suggesting a missing marine aerosol source in the model. The SOAP data will be further examined for evidence of nucleation events and also to identify relationships between MBL composition and surface ocean biogeochemistry that may provide potential proxies for aerosol precursors and production.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/13645/2017/acp-17-13645-2017.pdf |