Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures.

Small wind turbines (SWTs) have become increasingly common within the last decade, but their impact on wildlife, especially bats, is largely unknown. We conducted an operational experiment by sequentially placing a mobile SWT with five different operational modes at six sites of high bat activity, i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefanie A Hartmann, Klaus Hochradel, Sören Greule, Felix Günther, Bruntje Luedtke, Horst Schauer-Weisshahn, Robert Brinkmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253782
id doaj-1f29fe96a93c4302b271e9fd250ebe4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f29fe96a93c4302b271e9fd250ebe4a2021-07-10T04:30:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e025378210.1371/journal.pone.0253782Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures.Stefanie A HartmannKlaus HochradelSören GreuleFelix GüntherBruntje LuedtkeHorst Schauer-WeisshahnRobert BrinkmannSmall wind turbines (SWTs) have become increasingly common within the last decade, but their impact on wildlife, especially bats, is largely unknown. We conducted an operational experiment by sequentially placing a mobile SWT with five different operational modes at six sites of high bat activity, including roosts, commuting structures, and highly frequented hunting areas. Bat flight trajectories around the SWT were documented at each site during five consecutive nights using a specifically designed high-spatial-resolution 3D camera. The recordings showed high bat activity levels close to the SWT (7,065 flight trajectories within a 10-m radius). The minimum distance to the rotor of each trajectory varied between 0 and 18 m, with a mean of 4.6 m across all sites. Linear mixed models created to account for site differences showed that, compared to a reference pole without a SWT, bats flew 0.4 m closer to the rotor (95% CI 0.3-0.6 m) if it was out of operation and 0.3 m closer (95% CI 0.1-0.4 m) if it was moving slowly. Exploratory behavior was frequently observed, with many bats deviating from their original flight trajectory to approach the rotor. Among 7,850 documented trajectories, 176 crossed the rotor, including 65 while it was in motion. The collision of one P. pygmaeus individual occurred during the experiment. These results demonstrate that, despite the generally strong ability of bats to evade moving rotor blades, bat casualties at SWTs placed at sites of high bat activity can reach or exceed the current threshold levels set for large wind turbines. As SWTs provide less energy than large turbines, their negative impact on bats should be minimized by avoidance measures such as a bat-friendly site selection or curtailment algorithms.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253782
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefanie A Hartmann
Klaus Hochradel
Sören Greule
Felix Günther
Bruntje Luedtke
Horst Schauer-Weisshahn
Robert Brinkmann
spellingShingle Stefanie A Hartmann
Klaus Hochradel
Sören Greule
Felix Günther
Bruntje Luedtke
Horst Schauer-Weisshahn
Robert Brinkmann
Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stefanie A Hartmann
Klaus Hochradel
Sören Greule
Felix Günther
Bruntje Luedtke
Horst Schauer-Weisshahn
Robert Brinkmann
author_sort Stefanie A Hartmann
title Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures.
title_short Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures.
title_full Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures.
title_fullStr Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures.
title_full_unstemmed Collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: Worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures.
title_sort collision risk of bats with small wind turbines: worst-case scenarios near roosts, commuting and hunting structures.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Small wind turbines (SWTs) have become increasingly common within the last decade, but their impact on wildlife, especially bats, is largely unknown. We conducted an operational experiment by sequentially placing a mobile SWT with five different operational modes at six sites of high bat activity, including roosts, commuting structures, and highly frequented hunting areas. Bat flight trajectories around the SWT were documented at each site during five consecutive nights using a specifically designed high-spatial-resolution 3D camera. The recordings showed high bat activity levels close to the SWT (7,065 flight trajectories within a 10-m radius). The minimum distance to the rotor of each trajectory varied between 0 and 18 m, with a mean of 4.6 m across all sites. Linear mixed models created to account for site differences showed that, compared to a reference pole without a SWT, bats flew 0.4 m closer to the rotor (95% CI 0.3-0.6 m) if it was out of operation and 0.3 m closer (95% CI 0.1-0.4 m) if it was moving slowly. Exploratory behavior was frequently observed, with many bats deviating from their original flight trajectory to approach the rotor. Among 7,850 documented trajectories, 176 crossed the rotor, including 65 while it was in motion. The collision of one P. pygmaeus individual occurred during the experiment. These results demonstrate that, despite the generally strong ability of bats to evade moving rotor blades, bat casualties at SWTs placed at sites of high bat activity can reach or exceed the current threshold levels set for large wind turbines. As SWTs provide less energy than large turbines, their negative impact on bats should be minimized by avoidance measures such as a bat-friendly site selection or curtailment algorithms.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253782
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanieahartmann collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT klaushochradel collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT sorengreule collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT felixgunther collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT bruntjeluedtke collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT horstschauerweisshahn collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
AT robertbrinkmann collisionriskofbatswithsmallwindturbinesworstcasescenariosnearroostscommutingandhuntingstructures
_version_ 1721310008476434432