Examining Energy Futures Market Efficiency Under Multiple Regime Shifts

<p>This study examines the West Texas Intermediate crude oil (WTI), Europe Brent crude oil (Brent), heating oil no. 2, and Henry Hub natural gas futures markets’ efficiency following Fama’s (1970) weak-form efficiency hypothesis, using spot and futures prices at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months maturity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Onder Buberkoku
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EconJournals 2017-12-01
Series:International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Online Access:https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/5578
id doaj-1f1280a155fc49408ba087d30f6e8956
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f1280a155fc49408ba087d30f6e89562020-11-25T01:22:00ZengEconJournalsInternational Journal of Energy Economics and Policy2146-45532017-12-017661713011Examining Energy Futures Market Efficiency Under Multiple Regime ShiftsOnder Buberkoku0Faculty of Business Administration, Department of Finance, Yuzuncu Yil University,<p>This study examines the West Texas Intermediate crude oil (WTI), Europe Brent crude oil (Brent), heating oil no. 2, and Henry Hub natural gas futures markets’ efficiency following Fama’s (1970) weak-form efficiency hypothesis, using spot and futures prices at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months maturity based on the tests with unknown multiple regime shifts. The results show that it is important to consider the multiple regime shifts when determining whether energy futures markets are efficient. We find that WTI and Brent futures markets are not efficient, whereas natural gas and heating oil futures markets are efficient. Additionally, the findings also shed light on discussions about the stationary properties of energy commodities and whether spot and futures prices are cointegrated. In particular, this study presents new evidence based on the unit root and cointegration tests with multiple structural breaks. <strong></strong></p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Energy commodity, Futures market efficiency, Multiple structural  breaks</p><p><strong>JEL Classifications:</strong> G14, G15, Q40</p>https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/5578
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Onder Buberkoku
spellingShingle Onder Buberkoku
Examining Energy Futures Market Efficiency Under Multiple Regime Shifts
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
author_facet Onder Buberkoku
author_sort Onder Buberkoku
title Examining Energy Futures Market Efficiency Under Multiple Regime Shifts
title_short Examining Energy Futures Market Efficiency Under Multiple Regime Shifts
title_full Examining Energy Futures Market Efficiency Under Multiple Regime Shifts
title_fullStr Examining Energy Futures Market Efficiency Under Multiple Regime Shifts
title_full_unstemmed Examining Energy Futures Market Efficiency Under Multiple Regime Shifts
title_sort examining energy futures market efficiency under multiple regime shifts
publisher EconJournals
series International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
issn 2146-4553
publishDate 2017-12-01
description <p>This study examines the West Texas Intermediate crude oil (WTI), Europe Brent crude oil (Brent), heating oil no. 2, and Henry Hub natural gas futures markets’ efficiency following Fama’s (1970) weak-form efficiency hypothesis, using spot and futures prices at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months maturity based on the tests with unknown multiple regime shifts. The results show that it is important to consider the multiple regime shifts when determining whether energy futures markets are efficient. We find that WTI and Brent futures markets are not efficient, whereas natural gas and heating oil futures markets are efficient. Additionally, the findings also shed light on discussions about the stationary properties of energy commodities and whether spot and futures prices are cointegrated. In particular, this study presents new evidence based on the unit root and cointegration tests with multiple structural breaks. <strong></strong></p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Energy commodity, Futures market efficiency, Multiple structural  breaks</p><p><strong>JEL Classifications:</strong> G14, G15, Q40</p>
url https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/5578
work_keys_str_mv AT onderbuberkoku examiningenergyfuturesmarketefficiencyundermultipleregimeshifts
_version_ 1725128329695068160