Perceptions of Tennessee cattle producers regarding the Veterinary Feed Directive.

Since January 1, 2017, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has fully implemented the Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) final rule aimed at facilitating the judicious use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals. The objective of this study was to identify the co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John E Ekakoro, Marc Caldwell, Elizabeth B Strand, Chika C Okafor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217773
id doaj-1eeaab7811c548c0bca075b822e02d2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1eeaab7811c548c0bca075b822e02d2a2021-03-03T20:38:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01145e021777310.1371/journal.pone.0217773Perceptions of Tennessee cattle producers regarding the Veterinary Feed Directive.John E EkakoroMarc CaldwellElizabeth B StrandChika C OkaforSince January 1, 2017, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has fully implemented the Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) final rule aimed at facilitating the judicious use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals. The objective of this study was to identify the common perceptions of Tennessee (TN) cattle producers regarding the VFD. We used a combination of focus groups and survey questionnaires to explore TN cattle producers' perceptions regarding the VFD. Preliminary findings from seven focus groups of 62 producers were used in the development of the questionnaire sent both online and in-print to rest of cattle producers in TN. The beef focus group participants perceived the VFD: to be a top-down policy; to have led to unregulated access to in-feed antimicrobials; a regulation that has limited the producers' ability to prevent disease and leading to economic losses; to negatively affect small producers; and to be affected by challenges related to prescription writing and disposal of un-used medicines. The dairy focus group participants perceived the VFD as unnecessary and burdensome, to have affected small producers, and introduced additional costs. Among the survey questionnaire respondents, 35 (15.4%) beef producers and 6 (13.6%) dairy producers respectively were not familiar at all with the VFD. Forty-eight (21.1%) beef producers and 11 (25%) dairy producers were slightly familiar with VFD. Gender was significantly associated (P = 0.02) with the beef producers' belief in the usefulness of the VFD. Similarly, for dairy producers, herd size was significantly associated (P = 0.002) with their perceptions regarding the usefulness of the VFD. The findings of this study could inform future VFD policy review processes. More awareness regarding the VFD and its benefits is needed among both beef and dairy producers in TN.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217773
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John E Ekakoro
Marc Caldwell
Elizabeth B Strand
Chika C Okafor
spellingShingle John E Ekakoro
Marc Caldwell
Elizabeth B Strand
Chika C Okafor
Perceptions of Tennessee cattle producers regarding the Veterinary Feed Directive.
PLoS ONE
author_facet John E Ekakoro
Marc Caldwell
Elizabeth B Strand
Chika C Okafor
author_sort John E Ekakoro
title Perceptions of Tennessee cattle producers regarding the Veterinary Feed Directive.
title_short Perceptions of Tennessee cattle producers regarding the Veterinary Feed Directive.
title_full Perceptions of Tennessee cattle producers regarding the Veterinary Feed Directive.
title_fullStr Perceptions of Tennessee cattle producers regarding the Veterinary Feed Directive.
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of Tennessee cattle producers regarding the Veterinary Feed Directive.
title_sort perceptions of tennessee cattle producers regarding the veterinary feed directive.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Since January 1, 2017, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has fully implemented the Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) final rule aimed at facilitating the judicious use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals. The objective of this study was to identify the common perceptions of Tennessee (TN) cattle producers regarding the VFD. We used a combination of focus groups and survey questionnaires to explore TN cattle producers' perceptions regarding the VFD. Preliminary findings from seven focus groups of 62 producers were used in the development of the questionnaire sent both online and in-print to rest of cattle producers in TN. The beef focus group participants perceived the VFD: to be a top-down policy; to have led to unregulated access to in-feed antimicrobials; a regulation that has limited the producers' ability to prevent disease and leading to economic losses; to negatively affect small producers; and to be affected by challenges related to prescription writing and disposal of un-used medicines. The dairy focus group participants perceived the VFD as unnecessary and burdensome, to have affected small producers, and introduced additional costs. Among the survey questionnaire respondents, 35 (15.4%) beef producers and 6 (13.6%) dairy producers respectively were not familiar at all with the VFD. Forty-eight (21.1%) beef producers and 11 (25%) dairy producers were slightly familiar with VFD. Gender was significantly associated (P = 0.02) with the beef producers' belief in the usefulness of the VFD. Similarly, for dairy producers, herd size was significantly associated (P = 0.002) with their perceptions regarding the usefulness of the VFD. The findings of this study could inform future VFD policy review processes. More awareness regarding the VFD and its benefits is needed among both beef and dairy producers in TN.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217773
work_keys_str_mv AT johneekakoro perceptionsoftennesseecattleproducersregardingtheveterinaryfeeddirective
AT marccaldwell perceptionsoftennesseecattleproducersregardingtheveterinaryfeeddirective
AT elizabethbstrand perceptionsoftennesseecattleproducersregardingtheveterinaryfeeddirective
AT chikacokafor perceptionsoftennesseecattleproducersregardingtheveterinaryfeeddirective
_version_ 1714821362664603648