Outcomes with fracture-level transpedicular screws used for thoracolumbar junction fractures

Background Short-segment transpedicular screw fixation (SSTSF) is the preferred treatment option for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Adding screws in the fractured body may be helpful in achieving and maintaining fracture reduction. However, the operative approach is disputed. Objective To compare c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sergey V. Likhachev, Vladimir V. Zaretskov, Vladislav B. Arsenievich, Vladimir V. Ostrovskij, Alexei E. Shulga, Alexander V. Zaretskov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics 2020-12-01
Series:Гений oртопедии
Subjects:
id doaj-1edaa0e55cc04a4aaa2494e24adcbbbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1edaa0e55cc04a4aaa2494e24adcbbbf2020-12-22T04:56:03ZengRussian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and OrthopaedicsГений oртопедии1028-44272542-131X2020-12-0126454855410.18019/1028-4427-2020-26-4-548-554Outcomes with fracture-level transpedicular screws used for thoracolumbar junction fracturesSergey V. Likhachev0Vladimir V. Zaretskov1Vladislav B. Arsenievich2Vladimir V. Ostrovskij3Alexei E. Shulga4Alexander V. Zaretskov5Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov, Russian FederationSaratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov, Russian FederationSaratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov, Russian FederationSaratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov, Russian FederationSaratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov, Russian FederationSaratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov, Russian FederationBackground Short-segment transpedicular screw fixation (SSTSF) is the preferred treatment option for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Adding screws in the fractured body may be helpful in achieving and maintaining fracture reduction. However, the operative approach is disputed. Objective To compare clinical outcomes of transpedicular fixation with and without screws in the fractured vertebral body after isolated uncomplicated fractures at the thoracolumbar junction. Material and methods A retrospective cohort study enrolled 62 patients with Th11–L2 thoracolumbar burst fractures (AOSpine A3, A4) who underwent SSTSF with (n = 32) and without (n = 30) pedicle screws at the fracture level. Demographic data of the patients, operating time and blood loss were registered. Clinical evaluation using Visual analogue scale (VAS ) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to quantify disability and imaging parameters of segmental kyphosis, loss of correction, anterior vertebral body height (AVBH) at the fracture level, spinal canal stenosis (SCS) were measured preoperatively, at one week, 1 month, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results The patients of the two groups showed no statistically significant differences in the demographic data, VAS and ODI scores, measurements of kyphotic angle, AVBH, SCS preoperatively (p > 0.05). Screws at the fracture level did not affect the operating time and intraoperative blood loss relative to conventional no-screw group. Benefits with fracture screws were evident at 7 days (p < 0.01) measuring SCS, at 6 months (p < 0.01) and 12 (p < 0.01) months measuring kyphotic angle. There was better kyphosis correction (p < 0.01) and AVBH (p = 0.034) seen at 12 months after surgery. Conclusion Reinforcement of a broken vertebra with fracture-level screws has been shown to provide better stability of clinical and radiographic results as compared to those with conventional SSTSF.thoracolumbar junctionburst fracturetranspedicular fixationfracture-level transpedicular screws
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sergey V. Likhachev
Vladimir V. Zaretskov
Vladislav B. Arsenievich
Vladimir V. Ostrovskij
Alexei E. Shulga
Alexander V. Zaretskov
spellingShingle Sergey V. Likhachev
Vladimir V. Zaretskov
Vladislav B. Arsenievich
Vladimir V. Ostrovskij
Alexei E. Shulga
Alexander V. Zaretskov
Outcomes with fracture-level transpedicular screws used for thoracolumbar junction fractures
Гений oртопедии
thoracolumbar junction
burst fracture
transpedicular fixation
fracture-level transpedicular screws
author_facet Sergey V. Likhachev
Vladimir V. Zaretskov
Vladislav B. Arsenievich
Vladimir V. Ostrovskij
Alexei E. Shulga
Alexander V. Zaretskov
author_sort Sergey V. Likhachev
title Outcomes with fracture-level transpedicular screws used for thoracolumbar junction fractures
title_short Outcomes with fracture-level transpedicular screws used for thoracolumbar junction fractures
title_full Outcomes with fracture-level transpedicular screws used for thoracolumbar junction fractures
title_fullStr Outcomes with fracture-level transpedicular screws used for thoracolumbar junction fractures
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes with fracture-level transpedicular screws used for thoracolumbar junction fractures
title_sort outcomes with fracture-level transpedicular screws used for thoracolumbar junction fractures
publisher Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics
series Гений oртопедии
issn 1028-4427
2542-131X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Background Short-segment transpedicular screw fixation (SSTSF) is the preferred treatment option for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Adding screws in the fractured body may be helpful in achieving and maintaining fracture reduction. However, the operative approach is disputed. Objective To compare clinical outcomes of transpedicular fixation with and without screws in the fractured vertebral body after isolated uncomplicated fractures at the thoracolumbar junction. Material and methods A retrospective cohort study enrolled 62 patients with Th11–L2 thoracolumbar burst fractures (AOSpine A3, A4) who underwent SSTSF with (n = 32) and without (n = 30) pedicle screws at the fracture level. Demographic data of the patients, operating time and blood loss were registered. Clinical evaluation using Visual analogue scale (VAS ) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to quantify disability and imaging parameters of segmental kyphosis, loss of correction, anterior vertebral body height (AVBH) at the fracture level, spinal canal stenosis (SCS) were measured preoperatively, at one week, 1 month, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results The patients of the two groups showed no statistically significant differences in the demographic data, VAS and ODI scores, measurements of kyphotic angle, AVBH, SCS preoperatively (p > 0.05). Screws at the fracture level did not affect the operating time and intraoperative blood loss relative to conventional no-screw group. Benefits with fracture screws were evident at 7 days (p < 0.01) measuring SCS, at 6 months (p < 0.01) and 12 (p < 0.01) months measuring kyphotic angle. There was better kyphosis correction (p < 0.01) and AVBH (p = 0.034) seen at 12 months after surgery. Conclusion Reinforcement of a broken vertebra with fracture-level screws has been shown to provide better stability of clinical and radiographic results as compared to those with conventional SSTSF.
topic thoracolumbar junction
burst fracture
transpedicular fixation
fracture-level transpedicular screws
work_keys_str_mv AT sergeyvlikhachev outcomeswithfractureleveltranspedicularscrewsusedforthoracolumbarjunctionfractures
AT vladimirvzaretskov outcomeswithfractureleveltranspedicularscrewsusedforthoracolumbarjunctionfractures
AT vladislavbarsenievich outcomeswithfractureleveltranspedicularscrewsusedforthoracolumbarjunctionfractures
AT vladimirvostrovskij outcomeswithfractureleveltranspedicularscrewsusedforthoracolumbarjunctionfractures
AT alexeieshulga outcomeswithfractureleveltranspedicularscrewsusedforthoracolumbarjunctionfractures
AT alexandervzaretskov outcomeswithfractureleveltranspedicularscrewsusedforthoracolumbarjunctionfractures
_version_ 1724374312791572480