Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme® used in patients undergoing general anesthesia

Background and objectives: Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used as an option to tracheal intubation for elective procedures of varying complexity. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical use of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme® (LMAS) in patients undergoing ele...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara R. Barreira, Camila Machado Souza, Fernanda Fabrizia, Ana Bárbara G. Azevedo, Talitha G. Lelis, Claudia Lutke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-11-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001413001152
id doaj-1ed7ca8e23b54303a1daff37333c967d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ed7ca8e23b54303a1daff37333c967d2020-11-25T01:14:13ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0104-00142013-11-01636456460Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme® used in patients undergoing general anesthesiaSara R. Barreira0Camila Machado Souza1Fernanda Fabrizia2Ana Bárbara G. Azevedo3Talitha G. Lelis4Claudia Lutke5Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilCorresponding author.; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilBackground and objectives: Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used as an option to tracheal intubation for elective procedures of varying complexity. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical use of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme® (LMAS) in patients undergoing elective breast surgery and compare it with endotracheal tube (ETT). Methods: Sixty patients undergoing breast procedures under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups according to the device used (LMAS or ETT). Time of insertion, number of insertion attempts, hemodynamic response to insertion, presence of blood on the device used; and incidence of sore throat, dysphagia, nausea and vomiting were assessed postoperatively. Results: There was no difference between groups regarding time of insertion, number of attempts for successful insertion, and presence of blood on the device. Heart rate and blood pressure after insertion were higher in ETT group. Incidence of sore throat and dysphagia was also higher in ETT group after two hours in the postoperative period. There was no difference regarding incidence and severity of complications evaluated after six hours postoperatively. Conclusions: The use of the LMAS technique to access airway during general anesthesia for elective breast surgery is as safe and effective as tracheal intubation, with the advantage of promoting smaller hemodynamic response during its management and lower incidence of sore throat and dysphagia in the first hours after surgery. Keywords: Equipment, Laryngeal mask airway, Complications, General anesthesiahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001413001152
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sara R. Barreira
Camila Machado Souza
Fernanda Fabrizia
Ana Bárbara G. Azevedo
Talitha G. Lelis
Claudia Lutke
spellingShingle Sara R. Barreira
Camila Machado Souza
Fernanda Fabrizia
Ana Bárbara G. Azevedo
Talitha G. Lelis
Claudia Lutke
Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme® used in patients undergoing general anesthesia
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
author_facet Sara R. Barreira
Camila Machado Souza
Fernanda Fabrizia
Ana Bárbara G. Azevedo
Talitha G. Lelis
Claudia Lutke
author_sort Sara R. Barreira
title Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme® used in patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_short Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme® used in patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_full Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme® used in patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_fullStr Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme® used in patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway Supreme® used in patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_sort prospective, randomized clinical trial of laryngeal mask airway supreme® used in patients undergoing general anesthesia
publisher Elsevier
series Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 0104-0014
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Background and objectives: Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used as an option to tracheal intubation for elective procedures of varying complexity. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical use of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme® (LMAS) in patients undergoing elective breast surgery and compare it with endotracheal tube (ETT). Methods: Sixty patients undergoing breast procedures under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups according to the device used (LMAS or ETT). Time of insertion, number of insertion attempts, hemodynamic response to insertion, presence of blood on the device used; and incidence of sore throat, dysphagia, nausea and vomiting were assessed postoperatively. Results: There was no difference between groups regarding time of insertion, number of attempts for successful insertion, and presence of blood on the device. Heart rate and blood pressure after insertion were higher in ETT group. Incidence of sore throat and dysphagia was also higher in ETT group after two hours in the postoperative period. There was no difference regarding incidence and severity of complications evaluated after six hours postoperatively. Conclusions: The use of the LMAS technique to access airway during general anesthesia for elective breast surgery is as safe and effective as tracheal intubation, with the advantage of promoting smaller hemodynamic response during its management and lower incidence of sore throat and dysphagia in the first hours after surgery. Keywords: Equipment, Laryngeal mask airway, Complications, General anesthesia
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001413001152
work_keys_str_mv AT sararbarreira prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeusedinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
AT camilamachadosouza prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeusedinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
AT fernandafabrizia prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeusedinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
AT anabarbaragazevedo prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeusedinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
AT talithaglelis prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeusedinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
AT claudialutke prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeusedinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
_version_ 1725158043859025920