Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task

During training in a novel dynamic environment, the non-dominant upper limb favors feedback control, whereas the dominant limb favors feedforward mechanisms. Early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) offer a means to explore differences in cortical regions involved in sensorimotor integration (SM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian, Ryan Gilley, Danielle Andrew, Bernadette Murphy, Paul Yielder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/5/290
id doaj-1ed16a85b67848c3b203c52549a99b88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ed16a85b67848c3b203c52549a99b882020-11-25T03:24:49ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252020-05-011029029010.3390/brainsci10050290Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing TaskMahboobeh Zabihhosseinian0Ryan Gilley1Danielle Andrew2Bernadette Murphy3Paul Yielder4Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaDuring training in a novel dynamic environment, the non-dominant upper limb favors feedback control, whereas the dominant limb favors feedforward mechanisms. Early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) offer a means to explore differences in cortical regions involved in sensorimotor integration (SMI). This study sought to compare differences in SMI between the right (Dom) and left (Non-Dom) hand in healthy right-handed participants. SEPs were recorded in response to median nerve stimulation, at baseline and post, a motor skill acquisition-tracing task. One group (<i>n</i> = 12) trained with their Dom hand and the other group (<i>n</i> = 12), with their Non-Dom hand. The Non-Dom hand was significantly more accurate at baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and both groups improved with time (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), for task accuracy, with no significant interaction effect between groups for both post-acquisition and retention. There were significant group interactions for the N24 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the N30 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) SEP peaks. Post motor acquisition, the Dom hand had a 28.9% decrease in the N24 and a 23.8% increase in the N30, with opposite directional changes for the Non-Dom hand; 22.04% increase in N24 and 24% decrease in the N30. These SEP changes reveal differences in early SMI between Dom and Non-Dom hands in response to motor acquisition, providing objective, temporally sensitive measures of differences in neural mechanisms between the limbs.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/5/290somatosensory evoked potentialsmotor acquisitionsensorimotor integrationdominant handnon-dominant hand
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian
Ryan Gilley
Danielle Andrew
Bernadette Murphy
Paul Yielder
spellingShingle Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian
Ryan Gilley
Danielle Andrew
Bernadette Murphy
Paul Yielder
Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task
Brain Sciences
somatosensory evoked potentials
motor acquisition
sensorimotor integration
dominant hand
non-dominant hand
author_facet Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian
Ryan Gilley
Danielle Andrew
Bernadette Murphy
Paul Yielder
author_sort Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian
title Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task
title_short Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task
title_full Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task
title_fullStr Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task
title_full_unstemmed Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task
title_sort differential changes in early somatosensory evoked potentials between the dominant and non-dominant hand, following a novel motor tracing task
publisher MDPI AG
series Brain Sciences
issn 2076-3425
publishDate 2020-05-01
description During training in a novel dynamic environment, the non-dominant upper limb favors feedback control, whereas the dominant limb favors feedforward mechanisms. Early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) offer a means to explore differences in cortical regions involved in sensorimotor integration (SMI). This study sought to compare differences in SMI between the right (Dom) and left (Non-Dom) hand in healthy right-handed participants. SEPs were recorded in response to median nerve stimulation, at baseline and post, a motor skill acquisition-tracing task. One group (<i>n</i> = 12) trained with their Dom hand and the other group (<i>n</i> = 12), with their Non-Dom hand. The Non-Dom hand was significantly more accurate at baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and both groups improved with time (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), for task accuracy, with no significant interaction effect between groups for both post-acquisition and retention. There were significant group interactions for the N24 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the N30 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) SEP peaks. Post motor acquisition, the Dom hand had a 28.9% decrease in the N24 and a 23.8% increase in the N30, with opposite directional changes for the Non-Dom hand; 22.04% increase in N24 and 24% decrease in the N30. These SEP changes reveal differences in early SMI between Dom and Non-Dom hands in response to motor acquisition, providing objective, temporally sensitive measures of differences in neural mechanisms between the limbs.
topic somatosensory evoked potentials
motor acquisition
sensorimotor integration
dominant hand
non-dominant hand
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/5/290
work_keys_str_mv AT mahboobehzabihhosseinian differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask
AT ryangilley differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask
AT danielleandrew differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask
AT bernadettemurphy differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask
AT paulyielder differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask
_version_ 1724599631059353600