Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task
During training in a novel dynamic environment, the non-dominant upper limb favors feedback control, whereas the dominant limb favors feedforward mechanisms. Early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) offer a means to explore differences in cortical regions involved in sensorimotor integration (SM...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Brain Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/5/290 |
id |
doaj-1ed16a85b67848c3b203c52549a99b88 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1ed16a85b67848c3b203c52549a99b882020-11-25T03:24:49ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252020-05-011029029010.3390/brainsci10050290Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing TaskMahboobeh Zabihhosseinian0Ryan Gilley1Danielle Andrew2Bernadette Murphy3Paul Yielder4Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, CanadaDuring training in a novel dynamic environment, the non-dominant upper limb favors feedback control, whereas the dominant limb favors feedforward mechanisms. Early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) offer a means to explore differences in cortical regions involved in sensorimotor integration (SMI). This study sought to compare differences in SMI between the right (Dom) and left (Non-Dom) hand in healthy right-handed participants. SEPs were recorded in response to median nerve stimulation, at baseline and post, a motor skill acquisition-tracing task. One group (<i>n</i> = 12) trained with their Dom hand and the other group (<i>n</i> = 12), with their Non-Dom hand. The Non-Dom hand was significantly more accurate at baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and both groups improved with time (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), for task accuracy, with no significant interaction effect between groups for both post-acquisition and retention. There were significant group interactions for the N24 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the N30 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) SEP peaks. Post motor acquisition, the Dom hand had a 28.9% decrease in the N24 and a 23.8% increase in the N30, with opposite directional changes for the Non-Dom hand; 22.04% increase in N24 and 24% decrease in the N30. These SEP changes reveal differences in early SMI between Dom and Non-Dom hands in response to motor acquisition, providing objective, temporally sensitive measures of differences in neural mechanisms between the limbs.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/5/290somatosensory evoked potentialsmotor acquisitionsensorimotor integrationdominant handnon-dominant hand |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian Ryan Gilley Danielle Andrew Bernadette Murphy Paul Yielder |
spellingShingle |
Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian Ryan Gilley Danielle Andrew Bernadette Murphy Paul Yielder Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task Brain Sciences somatosensory evoked potentials motor acquisition sensorimotor integration dominant hand non-dominant hand |
author_facet |
Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian Ryan Gilley Danielle Andrew Bernadette Murphy Paul Yielder |
author_sort |
Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian |
title |
Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task |
title_short |
Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task |
title_full |
Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task |
title_fullStr |
Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task |
title_sort |
differential changes in early somatosensory evoked potentials between the dominant and non-dominant hand, following a novel motor tracing task |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Brain Sciences |
issn |
2076-3425 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
During training in a novel dynamic environment, the non-dominant upper limb favors feedback control, whereas the dominant limb favors feedforward mechanisms. Early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) offer a means to explore differences in cortical regions involved in sensorimotor integration (SMI). This study sought to compare differences in SMI between the right (Dom) and left (Non-Dom) hand in healthy right-handed participants. SEPs were recorded in response to median nerve stimulation, at baseline and post, a motor skill acquisition-tracing task. One group (<i>n</i> = 12) trained with their Dom hand and the other group (<i>n</i> = 12), with their Non-Dom hand. The Non-Dom hand was significantly more accurate at baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and both groups improved with time (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), for task accuracy, with no significant interaction effect between groups for both post-acquisition and retention. There were significant group interactions for the N24 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the N30 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) SEP peaks. Post motor acquisition, the Dom hand had a 28.9% decrease in the N24 and a 23.8% increase in the N30, with opposite directional changes for the Non-Dom hand; 22.04% increase in N24 and 24% decrease in the N30. These SEP changes reveal differences in early SMI between Dom and Non-Dom hands in response to motor acquisition, providing objective, temporally sensitive measures of differences in neural mechanisms between the limbs. |
topic |
somatosensory evoked potentials motor acquisition sensorimotor integration dominant hand non-dominant hand |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/5/290 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mahboobehzabihhosseinian differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask AT ryangilley differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask AT danielleandrew differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask AT bernadettemurphy differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask AT paulyielder differentialchangesinearlysomatosensoryevokedpotentialsbetweenthedominantandnondominanthandfollowinganovelmotortracingtask |
_version_ |
1724599631059353600 |