Do Reward-Related Distractors Impair Cognitive Performance? Perhaps Not

Over a hundred prior studies show that reward-related distractors capture attention. It is less clear, however, whether and when reward-related distractors affect performance on tasks that require cognitive control. In this experiment, we examined whether reward-related distractors impair performanc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dorottya Rusz, Erik Bijleveld, Michiel Kompier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of California Press 2019-03-01
Series:Collabra: Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.collabra.org/articles/169
id doaj-1ec3309c3b1347e38221d5a78cdcbc21
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ec3309c3b1347e38221d5a78cdcbc212020-11-24T21:48:54ZengUniversity of California PressCollabra: Psychology2474-73942019-03-015110.1525/collabra.169118Do Reward-Related Distractors Impair Cognitive Performance? Perhaps NotDorottya Rusz0Erik Bijleveld1Michiel Kompier2University of GlasgowBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud UniversityBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud UniversityOver a hundred prior studies show that reward-related distractors capture attention. It is less clear, however, whether and when reward-related distractors affect performance on tasks that require cognitive control. In this experiment, we examined whether reward-related distractors impair performance during a demanding arithmetic task. Participants (N = 81) solved math problems, while they were exposed to task-irrelevant stimuli that were previously associated with monetary rewards (vs. not). Although we found some evidence for reward learning in the training phase, results from the test phase showed no evidence that reward-related distractors harm cognitive performance. This null effect was invariant across different versions of our task. We examined the results further with Bayesian analyses, which showed positive evidence for the null. Altogether, the present study showed that reward-related distractors did not harm performance on a mental arithmetic task. When considered together with previous studies, the present study suggests that the negative impact of reward-related distractors on cognitive control is not as straightforward as it may seem, and that more research is needed to clarify the circumstances under which reward-related distractors harm cognitive control.https://www.collabra.org/articles/169distractorrewardcognitive controlcognitive performance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dorottya Rusz
Erik Bijleveld
Michiel Kompier
spellingShingle Dorottya Rusz
Erik Bijleveld
Michiel Kompier
Do Reward-Related Distractors Impair Cognitive Performance? Perhaps Not
Collabra: Psychology
distractor
reward
cognitive control
cognitive performance
author_facet Dorottya Rusz
Erik Bijleveld
Michiel Kompier
author_sort Dorottya Rusz
title Do Reward-Related Distractors Impair Cognitive Performance? Perhaps Not
title_short Do Reward-Related Distractors Impair Cognitive Performance? Perhaps Not
title_full Do Reward-Related Distractors Impair Cognitive Performance? Perhaps Not
title_fullStr Do Reward-Related Distractors Impair Cognitive Performance? Perhaps Not
title_full_unstemmed Do Reward-Related Distractors Impair Cognitive Performance? Perhaps Not
title_sort do reward-related distractors impair cognitive performance? perhaps not
publisher University of California Press
series Collabra: Psychology
issn 2474-7394
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Over a hundred prior studies show that reward-related distractors capture attention. It is less clear, however, whether and when reward-related distractors affect performance on tasks that require cognitive control. In this experiment, we examined whether reward-related distractors impair performance during a demanding arithmetic task. Participants (N = 81) solved math problems, while they were exposed to task-irrelevant stimuli that were previously associated with monetary rewards (vs. not). Although we found some evidence for reward learning in the training phase, results from the test phase showed no evidence that reward-related distractors harm cognitive performance. This null effect was invariant across different versions of our task. We examined the results further with Bayesian analyses, which showed positive evidence for the null. Altogether, the present study showed that reward-related distractors did not harm performance on a mental arithmetic task. When considered together with previous studies, the present study suggests that the negative impact of reward-related distractors on cognitive control is not as straightforward as it may seem, and that more research is needed to clarify the circumstances under which reward-related distractors harm cognitive control.
topic distractor
reward
cognitive control
cognitive performance
url https://www.collabra.org/articles/169
work_keys_str_mv AT dorottyarusz dorewardrelateddistractorsimpaircognitiveperformanceperhapsnot
AT erikbijleveld dorewardrelateddistractorsimpaircognitiveperformanceperhapsnot
AT michielkompier dorewardrelateddistractorsimpaircognitiveperformanceperhapsnot
_version_ 1725890712920129536