EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs
Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are con...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7411 |
id |
doaj-1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f42020-11-25T04:03:15ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-10-01107411741110.3390/app10217411EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode DesignsMadiha Rafaqat0Nadeem Ahmad Mufti1Naveed Ahmed2Abdulrahman M. Alahmari3Amjad Hussain4Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore-Pakistan 54890, PakistanDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore-Pakistan 54890, PakistanDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, Al Yamamah University, Riyadh 11512, Saudi ArabiaRaytheon Chair for Systems Engineering, Advanced Manufacturing Institute, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore-Pakistan 54890, PakistanElectric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7411EDMD2 steelrelief angleland thicknessmodified toolsmachining time |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Madiha Rafaqat Nadeem Ahmad Mufti Naveed Ahmed Abdulrahman M. Alahmari Amjad Hussain |
spellingShingle |
Madiha Rafaqat Nadeem Ahmad Mufti Naveed Ahmed Abdulrahman M. Alahmari Amjad Hussain EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs Applied Sciences EDM D2 steel relief angle land thickness modified tools machining time |
author_facet |
Madiha Rafaqat Nadeem Ahmad Mufti Naveed Ahmed Abdulrahman M. Alahmari Amjad Hussain |
author_sort |
Madiha Rafaqat |
title |
EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs |
title_short |
EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs |
title_full |
EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs |
title_fullStr |
EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs |
title_full_unstemmed |
EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs |
title_sort |
edm of d2 steel: performance comparison of edm die sinking electrode designs |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Applied Sciences |
issn |
2076-3417 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies. |
topic |
EDM D2 steel relief angle land thickness modified tools machining time |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7411 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT madiharafaqat edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns AT nadeemahmadmufti edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns AT naveedahmed edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns AT abdulrahmanmalahmari edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns AT amjadhussain edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns |
_version_ |
1724440964344315904 |