EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs

Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madiha Rafaqat, Nadeem Ahmad Mufti, Naveed Ahmed, Abdulrahman M. Alahmari, Amjad Hussain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
EDM
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7411
id doaj-1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f42020-11-25T04:03:15ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-10-01107411741110.3390/app10217411EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode DesignsMadiha Rafaqat0Nadeem Ahmad Mufti1Naveed Ahmed2Abdulrahman M. Alahmari3Amjad Hussain4Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore-Pakistan 54890, PakistanDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore-Pakistan 54890, PakistanDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, Al Yamamah University, Riyadh 11512, Saudi ArabiaRaytheon Chair for Systems Engineering, Advanced Manufacturing Institute, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore-Pakistan 54890, PakistanElectric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7411EDMD2 steelrelief angleland thicknessmodified toolsmachining time
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madiha Rafaqat
Nadeem Ahmad Mufti
Naveed Ahmed
Abdulrahman M. Alahmari
Amjad Hussain
spellingShingle Madiha Rafaqat
Nadeem Ahmad Mufti
Naveed Ahmed
Abdulrahman M. Alahmari
Amjad Hussain
EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs
Applied Sciences
EDM
D2 steel
relief angle
land thickness
modified tools
machining time
author_facet Madiha Rafaqat
Nadeem Ahmad Mufti
Naveed Ahmed
Abdulrahman M. Alahmari
Amjad Hussain
author_sort Madiha Rafaqat
title EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs
title_short EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs
title_full EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs
title_fullStr EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs
title_full_unstemmed EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs
title_sort edm of d2 steel: performance comparison of edm die sinking electrode designs
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.
topic EDM
D2 steel
relief angle
land thickness
modified tools
machining time
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7411
work_keys_str_mv AT madiharafaqat edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns
AT nadeemahmadmufti edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns
AT naveedahmed edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns
AT abdulrahmanmalahmari edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns
AT amjadhussain edmofd2steelperformancecomparisonofedmdiesinkingelectrodedesigns
_version_ 1724440964344315904