SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS

This paper deals with looking for the optimal configuration of automated assembly line model placed within Department of Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI). In order to solve this problem, Stateflow model of each configuration was created to simulate the behaviour of particular assembl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ján ČABALA, Ján JADLOVSKÝ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Technical University of Kosice 2017-06-01
Series:Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aei.tuke.sk/papers/2017/2/09_Cabala.pdf
id doaj-1eafdbd0566241be999024a209f0c600
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1eafdbd0566241be999024a209f0c6002020-11-24T23:17:57ZengTechnical University of Kosice Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica1335-82431335-82432017-06-01172536010.15546/aeei-2017-0017SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODSJán ČABALAJán JADLOVSKÝThis paper deals with looking for the optimal configuration of automated assembly line model placed within Department of Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI). In order to solve this problem, Stateflow model of each configuration was created to simulate the behaviour of particular assembly line configuration. Outputs from these models were used as inputs into the multiobjective decision making process. Multi-objective decision-making methods were subsequently used to find the optimal configuration of assembly line. Paper describes the whole process of solving this task, from building the models to choosing the best configuration. Specifically, the problem was resolved using the experts’ evaluation method for evaluating the weights of every decision-making criterion, while the ELECTRE III, TOPSIS and AGREPREF methods were used for ordering the possible solutions from the most to the least suitable alternative. Obtained results were compared and final solution of this multi-objective decisionmaking problem is chosen.http://www.aei.tuke.sk/papers/2017/2/09_Cabala.pdfmulti-objective decision makingassembly linesexperts’ evaluationELECTRETOPSISAGREPREF
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ján ČABALA
Ján JADLOVSKÝ
spellingShingle Ján ČABALA
Ján JADLOVSKÝ
SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS
Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica
multi-objective decision making
assembly lines
experts’ evaluation
ELECTRE
TOPSIS
AGREPREF
author_facet Ján ČABALA
Ján JADLOVSKÝ
author_sort Ján ČABALA
title SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS
title_short SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS
title_full SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS
title_fullStr SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS
title_full_unstemmed SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS
title_sort solving optimal assembly line configuration task by multiobjective decision making methods
publisher Technical University of Kosice
series Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica
issn 1335-8243
1335-8243
publishDate 2017-06-01
description This paper deals with looking for the optimal configuration of automated assembly line model placed within Department of Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI). In order to solve this problem, Stateflow model of each configuration was created to simulate the behaviour of particular assembly line configuration. Outputs from these models were used as inputs into the multiobjective decision making process. Multi-objective decision-making methods were subsequently used to find the optimal configuration of assembly line. Paper describes the whole process of solving this task, from building the models to choosing the best configuration. Specifically, the problem was resolved using the experts’ evaluation method for evaluating the weights of every decision-making criterion, while the ELECTRE III, TOPSIS and AGREPREF methods were used for ordering the possible solutions from the most to the least suitable alternative. Obtained results were compared and final solution of this multi-objective decisionmaking problem is chosen.
topic multi-objective decision making
assembly lines
experts’ evaluation
ELECTRE
TOPSIS
AGREPREF
url http://www.aei.tuke.sk/papers/2017/2/09_Cabala.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jancabala solvingoptimalassemblylineconfigurationtaskbymultiobjectivedecisionmakingmethods
AT janjadlovsky solvingoptimalassemblylineconfigurationtaskbymultiobjectivedecisionmakingmethods
_version_ 1725582553019056128