SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS
This paper deals with looking for the optimal configuration of automated assembly line model placed within Department of Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI). In order to solve this problem, Stateflow model of each configuration was created to simulate the behaviour of particular assembl...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Technical University of Kosice
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.aei.tuke.sk/papers/2017/2/09_Cabala.pdf |
id |
doaj-1eafdbd0566241be999024a209f0c600 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1eafdbd0566241be999024a209f0c6002020-11-24T23:17:57ZengTechnical University of Kosice Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica1335-82431335-82432017-06-01172536010.15546/aeei-2017-0017SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODSJán ČABALAJán JADLOVSKÝThis paper deals with looking for the optimal configuration of automated assembly line model placed within Department of Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI). In order to solve this problem, Stateflow model of each configuration was created to simulate the behaviour of particular assembly line configuration. Outputs from these models were used as inputs into the multiobjective decision making process. Multi-objective decision-making methods were subsequently used to find the optimal configuration of assembly line. Paper describes the whole process of solving this task, from building the models to choosing the best configuration. Specifically, the problem was resolved using the experts’ evaluation method for evaluating the weights of every decision-making criterion, while the ELECTRE III, TOPSIS and AGREPREF methods were used for ordering the possible solutions from the most to the least suitable alternative. Obtained results were compared and final solution of this multi-objective decisionmaking problem is chosen.http://www.aei.tuke.sk/papers/2017/2/09_Cabala.pdfmulti-objective decision makingassembly linesexperts’ evaluationELECTRETOPSISAGREPREF |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ján ČABALA Ján JADLOVSKÝ |
spellingShingle |
Ján ČABALA Ján JADLOVSKÝ SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica multi-objective decision making assembly lines experts’ evaluation ELECTRE TOPSIS AGREPREF |
author_facet |
Ján ČABALA Ján JADLOVSKÝ |
author_sort |
Ján ČABALA |
title |
SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS |
title_short |
SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS |
title_full |
SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS |
title_fullStr |
SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS |
title_full_unstemmed |
SOLVING OPTIMAL ASSEMBLY LINE CONFIGURATION TASK BY MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS |
title_sort |
solving optimal assembly line configuration task by multiobjective decision making methods |
publisher |
Technical University of Kosice |
series |
Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica |
issn |
1335-8243 1335-8243 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
This paper deals with looking for the optimal configuration of automated assembly line model placed within Department of
Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI). In order to solve this problem, Stateflow model of each configuration was created to
simulate the behaviour of particular assembly line configuration. Outputs from these models were used as inputs into the multiobjective
decision making process. Multi-objective decision-making methods were subsequently used to find the optimal
configuration of assembly line. Paper describes the whole process of solving this task, from building the models to choosing the best
configuration. Specifically, the problem was resolved using the experts’ evaluation method for evaluating the weights of every
decision-making criterion, while the ELECTRE III, TOPSIS and AGREPREF methods were used for ordering the possible solutions
from the most to the least suitable alternative. Obtained results were compared and final solution of this multi-objective decisionmaking
problem is chosen. |
topic |
multi-objective decision making assembly lines experts’ evaluation ELECTRE TOPSIS AGREPREF |
url |
http://www.aei.tuke.sk/papers/2017/2/09_Cabala.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jancabala solvingoptimalassemblylineconfigurationtaskbymultiobjectivedecisionmakingmethods AT janjadlovsky solvingoptimalassemblylineconfigurationtaskbymultiobjectivedecisionmakingmethods |
_version_ |
1725582553019056128 |