Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers

Abstract Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow jets of integrated water vapor transport that are important for the global water cycle and also have large impacts on local weather and regional hydrology. Uniformly weighted multi‐model averages have been used to describe how ARs will change in the futur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E.C. Massoud, V. Espinoza, B. Guan, D.E. Waliser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2019-10-01
Series:Earth's Future
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001249
id doaj-1e953cdb69134b6886aeaa90786aa170
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e953cdb69134b6886aeaa90786aa1702020-11-25T02:15:41ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth's Future2328-42772019-10-017101136115110.1029/2019EF001249Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric RiversE.C. Massoud0V. Espinoza1B. Guan2D.E. Waliser3Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USASchool of Engineering University of California Merced Merced CA USAJoint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering University of California Los Angeles CA USAJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USAAbstract Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow jets of integrated water vapor transport that are important for the global water cycle and also have large impacts on local weather and regional hydrology. Uniformly weighted multi‐model averages have been used to describe how ARs will change in the future, but this type of estimate does not consider skill or independence of the climate models of interest. Here, we utilize information from various model averaging approaches, such as Bayesian model averaging (BMA), to evaluate 21 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5. Model ensemble weighting strategies are based on model independence and AR performance skill relative to ERA‐Interim reanalysis data and result in higher accuracy for the historic period, for example, root mean square error for AR frequency (in % of time steps) of 0.69 for BMA versus 0.94 for the multi‐model ensemble mean. Model weighting strategies also result in lower uncertainties in the future estimates, for example, only 20–25% of the total uncertainties seen in the equal weighting strategy. These model averaging methods show, with high certainty, that globally the frequency of ARs is expected to have average relative increases of ~50% (and ~25% in AR intensity) by the end of the century.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001249climate changeatmospheric riversextreme weathermodel averagingskill and independencebayesian model averaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E.C. Massoud
V. Espinoza
B. Guan
D.E. Waliser
spellingShingle E.C. Massoud
V. Espinoza
B. Guan
D.E. Waliser
Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers
Earth's Future
climate change
atmospheric rivers
extreme weather
model averaging
skill and independence
bayesian model averaging
author_facet E.C. Massoud
V. Espinoza
B. Guan
D.E. Waliser
author_sort E.C. Massoud
title Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers
title_short Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers
title_full Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers
title_fullStr Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers
title_full_unstemmed Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers
title_sort global climate model ensemble approaches for future projections of atmospheric rivers
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Earth's Future
issn 2328-4277
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Abstract Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow jets of integrated water vapor transport that are important for the global water cycle and also have large impacts on local weather and regional hydrology. Uniformly weighted multi‐model averages have been used to describe how ARs will change in the future, but this type of estimate does not consider skill or independence of the climate models of interest. Here, we utilize information from various model averaging approaches, such as Bayesian model averaging (BMA), to evaluate 21 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5. Model ensemble weighting strategies are based on model independence and AR performance skill relative to ERA‐Interim reanalysis data and result in higher accuracy for the historic period, for example, root mean square error for AR frequency (in % of time steps) of 0.69 for BMA versus 0.94 for the multi‐model ensemble mean. Model weighting strategies also result in lower uncertainties in the future estimates, for example, only 20–25% of the total uncertainties seen in the equal weighting strategy. These model averaging methods show, with high certainty, that globally the frequency of ARs is expected to have average relative increases of ~50% (and ~25% in AR intensity) by the end of the century.
topic climate change
atmospheric rivers
extreme weather
model averaging
skill and independence
bayesian model averaging
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001249
work_keys_str_mv AT ecmassoud globalclimatemodelensembleapproachesforfutureprojectionsofatmosphericrivers
AT vespinoza globalclimatemodelensembleapproachesforfutureprojectionsofatmosphericrivers
AT bguan globalclimatemodelensembleapproachesforfutureprojectionsofatmosphericrivers
AT dewaliser globalclimatemodelensembleapproachesforfutureprojectionsofatmosphericrivers
_version_ 1724894574039531520