Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers
Abstract Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow jets of integrated water vapor transport that are important for the global water cycle and also have large impacts on local weather and regional hydrology. Uniformly weighted multi‐model averages have been used to describe how ARs will change in the futur...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Earth's Future |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001249 |
id |
doaj-1e953cdb69134b6886aeaa90786aa170 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1e953cdb69134b6886aeaa90786aa1702020-11-25T02:15:41ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth's Future2328-42772019-10-017101136115110.1029/2019EF001249Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric RiversE.C. Massoud0V. Espinoza1B. Guan2D.E. Waliser3Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USASchool of Engineering University of California Merced Merced CA USAJoint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering University of California Los Angeles CA USAJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USAAbstract Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow jets of integrated water vapor transport that are important for the global water cycle and also have large impacts on local weather and regional hydrology. Uniformly weighted multi‐model averages have been used to describe how ARs will change in the future, but this type of estimate does not consider skill or independence of the climate models of interest. Here, we utilize information from various model averaging approaches, such as Bayesian model averaging (BMA), to evaluate 21 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5. Model ensemble weighting strategies are based on model independence and AR performance skill relative to ERA‐Interim reanalysis data and result in higher accuracy for the historic period, for example, root mean square error for AR frequency (in % of time steps) of 0.69 for BMA versus 0.94 for the multi‐model ensemble mean. Model weighting strategies also result in lower uncertainties in the future estimates, for example, only 20–25% of the total uncertainties seen in the equal weighting strategy. These model averaging methods show, with high certainty, that globally the frequency of ARs is expected to have average relative increases of ~50% (and ~25% in AR intensity) by the end of the century.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001249climate changeatmospheric riversextreme weathermodel averagingskill and independencebayesian model averaging |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
E.C. Massoud V. Espinoza B. Guan D.E. Waliser |
spellingShingle |
E.C. Massoud V. Espinoza B. Guan D.E. Waliser Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers Earth's Future climate change atmospheric rivers extreme weather model averaging skill and independence bayesian model averaging |
author_facet |
E.C. Massoud V. Espinoza B. Guan D.E. Waliser |
author_sort |
E.C. Massoud |
title |
Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers |
title_short |
Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers |
title_full |
Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers |
title_fullStr |
Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers |
title_sort |
global climate model ensemble approaches for future projections of atmospheric rivers |
publisher |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
series |
Earth's Future |
issn |
2328-4277 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Abstract Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow jets of integrated water vapor transport that are important for the global water cycle and also have large impacts on local weather and regional hydrology. Uniformly weighted multi‐model averages have been used to describe how ARs will change in the future, but this type of estimate does not consider skill or independence of the climate models of interest. Here, we utilize information from various model averaging approaches, such as Bayesian model averaging (BMA), to evaluate 21 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5. Model ensemble weighting strategies are based on model independence and AR performance skill relative to ERA‐Interim reanalysis data and result in higher accuracy for the historic period, for example, root mean square error for AR frequency (in % of time steps) of 0.69 for BMA versus 0.94 for the multi‐model ensemble mean. Model weighting strategies also result in lower uncertainties in the future estimates, for example, only 20–25% of the total uncertainties seen in the equal weighting strategy. These model averaging methods show, with high certainty, that globally the frequency of ARs is expected to have average relative increases of ~50% (and ~25% in AR intensity) by the end of the century. |
topic |
climate change atmospheric rivers extreme weather model averaging skill and independence bayesian model averaging |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001249 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ecmassoud globalclimatemodelensembleapproachesforfutureprojectionsofatmosphericrivers AT vespinoza globalclimatemodelensembleapproachesforfutureprojectionsofatmosphericrivers AT bguan globalclimatemodelensembleapproachesforfutureprojectionsofatmosphericrivers AT dewaliser globalclimatemodelensembleapproachesforfutureprojectionsofatmosphericrivers |
_version_ |
1724894574039531520 |