Using Mathematica software for coal gasification simulations – Selected kinetic model application

Coal gasification is recognized as a one of promising Clean Coal Technologies. As the process itself is complicated and technologically demanding, it is subject of many research. In the paper a problem of using volumetric, non-reactive core and Johnson model for coal gasification and underground coa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sebastian Iwaszenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Central Mining Institute (Główny Instytut Górnictwa) 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Sustainable Mining
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2300396015000051
id doaj-1e917a7f4db542dc9e4d343c77760b45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e917a7f4db542dc9e4d343c77760b452020-12-02T07:47:57ZengCentral Mining Institute (Główny Instytut Górnictwa)Journal of Sustainable Mining2300-39602015-01-01141212910.1016/j.jsm.2015.08.004Using Mathematica software for coal gasification simulations – Selected kinetic model applicationSebastian IwaszenkoCoal gasification is recognized as a one of promising Clean Coal Technologies. As the process itself is complicated and technologically demanding, it is subject of many research. In the paper a problem of using volumetric, non-reactive core and Johnson model for coal gasification and underground coal gasification is considered. The usage of Mathematica software for models' equations solving and analysis is presented. Coal parameters were estimated for five Polish mines: Piast, Ziemowit, Janina, Szczygłowice and Bobrek. For each coal the models' parameters were determined. The determination of parameters was based on reactivity assessment for 50% char conversion. The calculations show relatively small differences between conversion predicted by volumetric and non reactive core model. More significant differences were observed for Johnson model, but they do not exceeded 10% for final char conversion. The conceptual model for underground coal gasification was presented.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2300396015000051Coal gasificationKinetic modelsSimulationsMathematica
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Iwaszenko
spellingShingle Sebastian Iwaszenko
Using Mathematica software for coal gasification simulations – Selected kinetic model application
Journal of Sustainable Mining
Coal gasification
Kinetic models
Simulations
Mathematica
author_facet Sebastian Iwaszenko
author_sort Sebastian Iwaszenko
title Using Mathematica software for coal gasification simulations – Selected kinetic model application
title_short Using Mathematica software for coal gasification simulations – Selected kinetic model application
title_full Using Mathematica software for coal gasification simulations – Selected kinetic model application
title_fullStr Using Mathematica software for coal gasification simulations – Selected kinetic model application
title_full_unstemmed Using Mathematica software for coal gasification simulations – Selected kinetic model application
title_sort using mathematica software for coal gasification simulations – selected kinetic model application
publisher Central Mining Institute (Główny Instytut Górnictwa)
series Journal of Sustainable Mining
issn 2300-3960
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Coal gasification is recognized as a one of promising Clean Coal Technologies. As the process itself is complicated and technologically demanding, it is subject of many research. In the paper a problem of using volumetric, non-reactive core and Johnson model for coal gasification and underground coal gasification is considered. The usage of Mathematica software for models' equations solving and analysis is presented. Coal parameters were estimated for five Polish mines: Piast, Ziemowit, Janina, Szczygłowice and Bobrek. For each coal the models' parameters were determined. The determination of parameters was based on reactivity assessment for 50% char conversion. The calculations show relatively small differences between conversion predicted by volumetric and non reactive core model. More significant differences were observed for Johnson model, but they do not exceeded 10% for final char conversion. The conceptual model for underground coal gasification was presented.
topic Coal gasification
Kinetic models
Simulations
Mathematica
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2300396015000051
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianiwaszenko usingmathematicasoftwareforcoalgasificationsimulationsselectedkineticmodelapplication
_version_ 1724408089580404736