Using structural and functional MRI as a neuroimaging technique to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy: a systematic review

Objective This systematic review aims to synthesise and evaluate structural MRI (sMRI) and functional MRI (fMRI) studies in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).Methods We systematically searched Medline and Ovid and included articles from 1991 (date of Oxford diagnostic crite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esther Crawley, Basim Almutairi, Christelle Langley, Ngoc Jade Thai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e031672.full
id doaj-1e8c6e3ed51c459083278c9e2919be26
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e8c6e3ed51c459083278c9e2919be262021-05-28T12:32:12ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-08-0110810.1136/bmjopen-2019-031672Using structural and functional MRI as a neuroimaging technique to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy: a systematic reviewEsther Crawley0Basim Almutairi1Christelle Langley2Ngoc Jade Thai3Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKClinical Research and Imaging Centre, Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, Bristol, UKThe Herchel Smith Building for Brain and Mind Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UKClinical Research and Imaging Centre, Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, Bristol, UKObjective This systematic review aims to synthesise and evaluate structural MRI (sMRI) and functional MRI (fMRI) studies in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).Methods We systematically searched Medline and Ovid and included articles from 1991 (date of Oxford diagnostic criteria for CFS/ME) to first April 2019. Studies were selected by predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently reviewed the titles and abstracts to determine articles for inclusion, full text and quality assessment for risk of bias.Results sMRI studies report differences in CFS/ME brain anatomy in grey and white matter volume, ventricular enlargement and hyperintensities. Three studies report no neuroanatomical differences between CFS/ME and healthy controls. Task-based fMRI investigated working memory, attention, reward and motivation, sensory information processing and emotional conflict. The most consistent finding was CFS/ME exhibited increased activations and recruited additional brain regions. Tasks with increasing load or complexity produced decreased activation in task-specific brain regions.Conclusions There were insufficient data to define a unique neural profile or biomarker of CFS/ME. This may be due to inconsistencies in finding neuroanatomical differences in CFS/ME and the variety of different tasks employed by fMRI studies. But there are also limitations with neuroimaging. All brain region specific volumetric differences in CFS/ME were derived from voxel-based statistics that are biased towards group differences that are highly localised in space. fMRI studies demonstrated both increases and decreases in activation patterns in CFS/ME, this may be related to task demand. However, fMRI signal cannot differentiate between neural excitation and inhibition or function-specific neural processing. Many studies have small sample sizes and did not control for the heterogeneity of this clinical population. We suggest that with robust study design, subgrouping and larger sample sizes, future neuroimaging studies could potentially lead to a breakthrough in our understanding of the disease.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e031672.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Esther Crawley
Basim Almutairi
Christelle Langley
Ngoc Jade Thai
spellingShingle Esther Crawley
Basim Almutairi
Christelle Langley
Ngoc Jade Thai
Using structural and functional MRI as a neuroimaging technique to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy: a systematic review
BMJ Open
author_facet Esther Crawley
Basim Almutairi
Christelle Langley
Ngoc Jade Thai
author_sort Esther Crawley
title Using structural and functional MRI as a neuroimaging technique to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy: a systematic review
title_short Using structural and functional MRI as a neuroimaging technique to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy: a systematic review
title_full Using structural and functional MRI as a neuroimaging technique to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy: a systematic review
title_fullStr Using structural and functional MRI as a neuroimaging technique to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Using structural and functional MRI as a neuroimaging technique to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy: a systematic review
title_sort using structural and functional mri as a neuroimaging technique to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy: a systematic review
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Objective This systematic review aims to synthesise and evaluate structural MRI (sMRI) and functional MRI (fMRI) studies in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).Methods We systematically searched Medline and Ovid and included articles from 1991 (date of Oxford diagnostic criteria for CFS/ME) to first April 2019. Studies were selected by predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently reviewed the titles and abstracts to determine articles for inclusion, full text and quality assessment for risk of bias.Results sMRI studies report differences in CFS/ME brain anatomy in grey and white matter volume, ventricular enlargement and hyperintensities. Three studies report no neuroanatomical differences between CFS/ME and healthy controls. Task-based fMRI investigated working memory, attention, reward and motivation, sensory information processing and emotional conflict. The most consistent finding was CFS/ME exhibited increased activations and recruited additional brain regions. Tasks with increasing load or complexity produced decreased activation in task-specific brain regions.Conclusions There were insufficient data to define a unique neural profile or biomarker of CFS/ME. This may be due to inconsistencies in finding neuroanatomical differences in CFS/ME and the variety of different tasks employed by fMRI studies. But there are also limitations with neuroimaging. All brain region specific volumetric differences in CFS/ME were derived from voxel-based statistics that are biased towards group differences that are highly localised in space. fMRI studies demonstrated both increases and decreases in activation patterns in CFS/ME, this may be related to task demand. However, fMRI signal cannot differentiate between neural excitation and inhibition or function-specific neural processing. Many studies have small sample sizes and did not control for the heterogeneity of this clinical population. We suggest that with robust study design, subgrouping and larger sample sizes, future neuroimaging studies could potentially lead to a breakthrough in our understanding of the disease.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e031672.full
work_keys_str_mv AT esthercrawley usingstructuralandfunctionalmriasaneuroimagingtechniquetoinvestigatechronicfatiguesyndromemyalgicencephalopathyasystematicreview
AT basimalmutairi usingstructuralandfunctionalmriasaneuroimagingtechniquetoinvestigatechronicfatiguesyndromemyalgicencephalopathyasystematicreview
AT christellelangley usingstructuralandfunctionalmriasaneuroimagingtechniquetoinvestigatechronicfatiguesyndromemyalgicencephalopathyasystematicreview
AT ngocjadethai usingstructuralandfunctionalmriasaneuroimagingtechniquetoinvestigatechronicfatiguesyndromemyalgicencephalopathyasystematicreview
_version_ 1721424080211542016