Creating and sharing reproducible research code the workflowr way [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]
Making scientific analyses reproducible, well documented, and easily shareable is crucial to maximizing their impact and ensuring that others can build on them. However, accomplishing these goals is not easy, requiring careful attention to organization, workflow, and familiarity with tools that are...
Main Authors: | John D. Blischak, Peter Carbonetto, Matthew Stephens |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2019-10-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1749/v1 |
Similar Items
-
Shared Genetics of Psychiatric Disorders [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Tova Fuller, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Cellular agriculture in the UK: a review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Neil Stephens, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Cellular agriculture in the UK: a review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Neil Stephens, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
BioHackathon 2015: Semantics of data for life sciences and reproducible research [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Rutger A. Vos, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
A guide to creating design matrices for gene expression experiments [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Charity W. Law, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)