An open-system approach to medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
This article focuses on a specific debate within theories of professions. Despite different trends, there has been difficulty in theorizing some dimensions of the dominant perspectives because of predominant institutional attention. The aim here was to reinforce the debate with complementary concept...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Unesp)
|
Series: | Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-32832011000300013&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-1e7131e523ab44a28ef143020af8c489 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1e7131e523ab44a28ef143020af8c4892020-11-25T00:30:23ZengFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Unesp)Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação1807-57621538779792S1414-32832011000300013An open-system approach to medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professionsTiago Correia0Instituto Universitário de LisboaThis article focuses on a specific debate within theories of professions. Despite different trends, there has been difficulty in theorizing some dimensions of the dominant perspectives because of predominant institutional attention. The aim here was to reinforce the debate with complementary conceptualization of professionalism and, consequently, to foster new understandings of professional relationships. The argument lies in shifting the analytical level from the professions to professionals, as a basic step in conceptualizing individual action within professional contexts. This concern becomes increasingly important as the professional discretion structurally held by individuals becomes greater, since the ability to choose leads more explicitly to internal differentiation of professions. Systemic influence is felt given that social structures are intrinsically involved in actions, which represent exteriorizations of individually internalized processes. Consequently, it becomes necessary to consider the reasons for behaviors and the meanings individually conferred on professional dimensions.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-32832011000300013&lng=en&tlng=enDiscrecionalidad médicaEstructuras socialesAgenciaTeorías sociológicasSociología de las profesiones |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tiago Correia |
spellingShingle |
Tiago Correia An open-system approach to medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação Discrecionalidad médica Estructuras sociales Agencia Teorías sociológicas Sociología de las profesiones |
author_facet |
Tiago Correia |
author_sort |
Tiago Correia |
title |
An open-system approach to medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions |
title_short |
An open-system approach to medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions |
title_full |
An open-system approach to medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions |
title_fullStr |
An open-system approach to medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions |
title_full_unstemmed |
An open-system approach to medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions |
title_sort |
open-system approach to medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions |
publisher |
Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Unesp) |
series |
Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação |
issn |
1807-5762 |
description |
This article focuses on a specific debate within theories of professions. Despite different trends, there has been difficulty in theorizing some dimensions of the dominant perspectives because of predominant institutional attention. The aim here was to reinforce the debate with complementary conceptualization of professionalism and, consequently, to foster new understandings of professional relationships. The argument lies in shifting the analytical level from the professions to professionals, as a basic step in conceptualizing individual action within professional contexts. This concern becomes increasingly important as the professional discretion structurally held by individuals becomes greater, since the ability to choose leads more explicitly to internal differentiation of professions. Systemic influence is felt given that social structures are intrinsically involved in actions, which represent exteriorizations of individually internalized processes. Consequently, it becomes necessary to consider the reasons for behaviors and the meanings individually conferred on professional dimensions. |
topic |
Discrecionalidad médica Estructuras sociales Agencia Teorías sociológicas Sociología de las profesiones |
url |
http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-32832011000300013&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tiagocorreia anopensystemapproachtomedicalprofessionalismacontroversywithinthesociologyofprofessions AT tiagocorreia opensystemapproachtomedicalprofessionalismacontroversywithinthesociologyofprofessions |
_version_ |
1725326921069232128 |