Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?

Abstract Technological advances have led to a strong increase in the number of data collection efforts aimed at measuring co-presence of individuals at different spatial resolutions. It is however unclear how much co-presence data can inform us on actual face-to-face contacts, of particular interest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathieu Génois, Alain Barrat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-05-01
Series:EPJ Data Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0140-1
id doaj-1e61581b0fc7422b85c939f5f6687f8c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e61581b0fc7422b85c939f5f6687f8c2020-11-25T00:18:43ZengSpringerOpenEPJ Data Science2193-11272018-05-017111810.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0140-1Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?Mathieu Génois0Alain Barrat1CNRS, CPT, Aix Marseille Univ, Université de ToulonCNRS, CPT, Aix Marseille Univ, Université de ToulonAbstract Technological advances have led to a strong increase in the number of data collection efforts aimed at measuring co-presence of individuals at different spatial resolutions. It is however unclear how much co-presence data can inform us on actual face-to-face contacts, of particular interest to study the structure of a population in social groups or for use in data-driven models of information or epidemic spreading processes. Here, we address this issue by leveraging data sets containing high resolution face-to-face contacts as well as a coarser spatial localisation of individuals, both temporally resolved, in various contexts. The co-presence and the face-to-face contact temporal networks share a number of structural and statistical features, but the former is (by definition) much denser than the latter. We thus consider several down-sampling methods that generate surrogate contact networks from the co-presence signal and compare them with the real face-to-face data. We show that these surrogate networks reproduce some features of the real data but are only partially able to identify the most central nodes of the face-to-face network. We then address the issue of using such down-sampled co-presence data in data-driven simulations of epidemic processes, and in identifying efficient containment strategies. We show that the performance of the various sampling methods strongly varies depending on context. We discuss the consequences of our results with respect to data collection strategies and methodologies.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0140-1Face-to-face contactsCo-presenceDigital epidemiologyComplex networks
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mathieu Génois
Alain Barrat
spellingShingle Mathieu Génois
Alain Barrat
Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
EPJ Data Science
Face-to-face contacts
Co-presence
Digital epidemiology
Complex networks
author_facet Mathieu Génois
Alain Barrat
author_sort Mathieu Génois
title Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
title_short Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
title_full Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
title_fullStr Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
title_full_unstemmed Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
title_sort can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?
publisher SpringerOpen
series EPJ Data Science
issn 2193-1127
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Abstract Technological advances have led to a strong increase in the number of data collection efforts aimed at measuring co-presence of individuals at different spatial resolutions. It is however unclear how much co-presence data can inform us on actual face-to-face contacts, of particular interest to study the structure of a population in social groups or for use in data-driven models of information or epidemic spreading processes. Here, we address this issue by leveraging data sets containing high resolution face-to-face contacts as well as a coarser spatial localisation of individuals, both temporally resolved, in various contexts. The co-presence and the face-to-face contact temporal networks share a number of structural and statistical features, but the former is (by definition) much denser than the latter. We thus consider several down-sampling methods that generate surrogate contact networks from the co-presence signal and compare them with the real face-to-face data. We show that these surrogate networks reproduce some features of the real data but are only partially able to identify the most central nodes of the face-to-face network. We then address the issue of using such down-sampled co-presence data in data-driven simulations of epidemic processes, and in identifying efficient containment strategies. We show that the performance of the various sampling methods strongly varies depending on context. We discuss the consequences of our results with respect to data collection strategies and methodologies.
topic Face-to-face contacts
Co-presence
Digital epidemiology
Complex networks
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0140-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mathieugenois cancolocationbeusedasaproxyforfacetofacecontacts
AT alainbarrat cancolocationbeusedasaproxyforfacetofacecontacts
_version_ 1725374907496267776