Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study
Introduction: Population monitoring and screening of blood pressure is an important part of any population health strategy. Qualified health workers are expensive and often unavailable for screening. Non-health workers with electronic blood pressure monitors are increasingly used in community-based...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2012-06-01
|
Series: | Global Health Action |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/14876/pdf_1 |
id |
doaj-1e5693cf7cd746c9808b2cd3d5cce1f2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1e5693cf7cd746c9808b2cd3d5cce1f22020-11-25T00:54:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-98802012-06-01501910.3402/gha.v5i0.14876Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation studyDaniel D. ReidpathMei Lee LingShajahan YasinKanason RajagobalPascale AlloteyIntroduction: Population monitoring and screening of blood pressure is an important part of any population health strategy. Qualified health workers are expensive and often unavailable for screening. Non-health workers with electronic blood pressure monitors are increasingly used in community-based research. This approach is unvalidated. In a poor, urban community we compared blood pressure measurements taken by non-health workers using electronic devices against qualified health workers using mercury sphygmomanometers. Method: Fifty-six adult volunteers participated in the research. Data were collected by five qualified health workers, and six non-health workers. Participants were randomly allocated to have their blood pressure measured on four consecutive occasions by alternating a qualified health worker with a non-health worker. Descriptive statistics and graphs, and mixed effects linear models to account for the repeated measurement were used in the analysis. Results: Blood pressure readings by non-health workers were more reliable than those taken by qualified health workers. There was no significant difference between the readings taken by qualified health workers and those taken by non-health workers for systolic blood pressure. Non-health workers were, on average, 5–7 mmHg lower in their measures of blood pressure than the qualified health workers (95%HPD: −2.9 to −10.0) for diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion: The results provide empirical evidence that supports the practice of non-health workers using electronic devices for BP measurement in community-based research and screening. Non-health workers recorded blood pressures that differed from qualified health workers by no more than 10 mmHg. The approach is promising, but more research is needed to establish the generalisability of the results.http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/14876/pdf_1blood pressurehypertensionmeasurementcommunity workersscreeningMalaysia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel D. Reidpath Mei Lee Ling Shajahan Yasin Kanason Rajagobal Pascale Allotey |
spellingShingle |
Daniel D. Reidpath Mei Lee Ling Shajahan Yasin Kanason Rajagobal Pascale Allotey Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study Global Health Action blood pressure hypertension measurement community workers screening Malaysia |
author_facet |
Daniel D. Reidpath Mei Lee Ling Shajahan Yasin Kanason Rajagobal Pascale Allotey |
author_sort |
Daniel D. Reidpath |
title |
Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study |
title_short |
Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study |
title_full |
Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study |
title_fullStr |
Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study |
title_sort |
community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Global Health Action |
issn |
1654-9880 |
publishDate |
2012-06-01 |
description |
Introduction: Population monitoring and screening of blood pressure is an important part of any population health strategy. Qualified health workers are expensive and often unavailable for screening. Non-health workers with electronic blood pressure monitors are increasingly used in community-based research. This approach is unvalidated. In a poor, urban community we compared blood pressure measurements taken by non-health workers using electronic devices against qualified health workers using mercury sphygmomanometers. Method: Fifty-six adult volunteers participated in the research. Data were collected by five qualified health workers, and six non-health workers. Participants were randomly allocated to have their blood pressure measured on four consecutive occasions by alternating a qualified health worker with a non-health worker. Descriptive statistics and graphs, and mixed effects linear models to account for the repeated measurement were used in the analysis. Results: Blood pressure readings by non-health workers were more reliable than those taken by qualified health workers. There was no significant difference between the readings taken by qualified health workers and those taken by non-health workers for systolic blood pressure. Non-health workers were, on average, 5–7 mmHg lower in their measures of blood pressure than the qualified health workers (95%HPD: −2.9 to −10.0) for diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion: The results provide empirical evidence that supports the practice of non-health workers using electronic devices for BP measurement in community-based research and screening. Non-health workers recorded blood pressures that differed from qualified health workers by no more than 10 mmHg. The approach is promising, but more research is needed to establish the generalisability of the results. |
topic |
blood pressure hypertension measurement community workers screening Malaysia |
url |
http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/14876/pdf_1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danieldreidpath communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy AT meileeling communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy AT shajahanyasin communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy AT kanasonrajagobal communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy AT pascaleallotey communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy |
_version_ |
1725234397931634688 |