Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study

Introduction: Population monitoring and screening of blood pressure is an important part of any population health strategy. Qualified health workers are expensive and often unavailable for screening. Non-health workers with electronic blood pressure monitors are increasingly used in community-based...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel D. Reidpath, Mei Lee Ling, Shajahan Yasin, Kanason Rajagobal, Pascale Allotey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2012-06-01
Series:Global Health Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/14876/pdf_1
id doaj-1e5693cf7cd746c9808b2cd3d5cce1f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e5693cf7cd746c9808b2cd3d5cce1f22020-11-25T00:54:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-98802012-06-01501910.3402/gha.v5i0.14876Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation studyDaniel D. ReidpathMei Lee LingShajahan YasinKanason RajagobalPascale AlloteyIntroduction: Population monitoring and screening of blood pressure is an important part of any population health strategy. Qualified health workers are expensive and often unavailable for screening. Non-health workers with electronic blood pressure monitors are increasingly used in community-based research. This approach is unvalidated. In a poor, urban community we compared blood pressure measurements taken by non-health workers using electronic devices against qualified health workers using mercury sphygmomanometers. Method: Fifty-six adult volunteers participated in the research. Data were collected by five qualified health workers, and six non-health workers. Participants were randomly allocated to have their blood pressure measured on four consecutive occasions by alternating a qualified health worker with a non-health worker. Descriptive statistics and graphs, and mixed effects linear models to account for the repeated measurement were used in the analysis. Results: Blood pressure readings by non-health workers were more reliable than those taken by qualified health workers. There was no significant difference between the readings taken by qualified health workers and those taken by non-health workers for systolic blood pressure. Non-health workers were, on average, 5–7 mmHg lower in their measures of blood pressure than the qualified health workers (95%HPD: −2.9 to −10.0) for diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion: The results provide empirical evidence that supports the practice of non-health workers using electronic devices for BP measurement in community-based research and screening. Non-health workers recorded blood pressures that differed from qualified health workers by no more than 10 mmHg. The approach is promising, but more research is needed to establish the generalisability of the results.http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/14876/pdf_1blood pressurehypertensionmeasurementcommunity workersscreeningMalaysia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel D. Reidpath
Mei Lee Ling
Shajahan Yasin
Kanason Rajagobal
Pascale Allotey
spellingShingle Daniel D. Reidpath
Mei Lee Ling
Shajahan Yasin
Kanason Rajagobal
Pascale Allotey
Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study
Global Health Action
blood pressure
hypertension
measurement
community workers
screening
Malaysia
author_facet Daniel D. Reidpath
Mei Lee Ling
Shajahan Yasin
Kanason Rajagobal
Pascale Allotey
author_sort Daniel D. Reidpath
title Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study
title_short Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study
title_full Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study
title_fullStr Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study
title_full_unstemmed Community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study
title_sort community-based blood pressure measurement by non-health workers using electronic devices: a validation study
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Global Health Action
issn 1654-9880
publishDate 2012-06-01
description Introduction: Population monitoring and screening of blood pressure is an important part of any population health strategy. Qualified health workers are expensive and often unavailable for screening. Non-health workers with electronic blood pressure monitors are increasingly used in community-based research. This approach is unvalidated. In a poor, urban community we compared blood pressure measurements taken by non-health workers using electronic devices against qualified health workers using mercury sphygmomanometers. Method: Fifty-six adult volunteers participated in the research. Data were collected by five qualified health workers, and six non-health workers. Participants were randomly allocated to have their blood pressure measured on four consecutive occasions by alternating a qualified health worker with a non-health worker. Descriptive statistics and graphs, and mixed effects linear models to account for the repeated measurement were used in the analysis. Results: Blood pressure readings by non-health workers were more reliable than those taken by qualified health workers. There was no significant difference between the readings taken by qualified health workers and those taken by non-health workers for systolic blood pressure. Non-health workers were, on average, 5–7 mmHg lower in their measures of blood pressure than the qualified health workers (95%HPD: −2.9 to −10.0) for diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion: The results provide empirical evidence that supports the practice of non-health workers using electronic devices for BP measurement in community-based research and screening. Non-health workers recorded blood pressures that differed from qualified health workers by no more than 10 mmHg. The approach is promising, but more research is needed to establish the generalisability of the results.
topic blood pressure
hypertension
measurement
community workers
screening
Malaysia
url http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/14876/pdf_1
work_keys_str_mv AT danieldreidpath communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy
AT meileeling communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy
AT shajahanyasin communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy
AT kanasonrajagobal communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy
AT pascaleallotey communitybasedbloodpressuremeasurementbynonhealthworkersusingelectronicdevicesavalidationstudy
_version_ 1725234397931634688