Dans le signe du son. Bruit, voix, corps et improvisation

Relying on Michel Foucault’s concept of genealogy, this paper offers two coupled thesis’ concerning improvisation in jazz.   The first is a historical diagnosis: once the notion of a musical «work» (written and through-composed) has become the aesthetic paradigm to evaluate music in general, the (or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Davide Sparti
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Centre d´Histoire et Théorie des Arts 2011-04-01
Series:Images Re-Vues
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/imagesrevues/417
id doaj-1e4ab46f2c2f4d3fba20f37d527f9fbc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e4ab46f2c2f4d3fba20f37d527f9fbc2020-11-25T00:05:20ZfraCentre d´Histoire et Théorie des ArtsImages Re-Vues1778-38012011-04-017Dans le signe du son. Bruit, voix, corps et improvisationDavide SpartiRelying on Michel Foucault’s concept of genealogy, this paper offers two coupled thesis’ concerning improvisation in jazz.   The first is a historical diagnosis: once the notion of a musical «work» (written and through-composed) has become the aesthetic paradigm to evaluate music in general, the (oral) practice of improvisation has been marginalized.    The second thesis is that improvisation has been perceived as threatening because of the way it is connected to the «sounding bodies» of those who enact it.   Every language has an implicit phonetic code: some sounds are admitted (and admired), others are not.  In a culture that emphasizes the visual and the written, a sound which does not fit in a code (say as part of the chromatic segmentation), hence a sound deprived of a semantic function, becomes threatening.   This is shown by exploring the ontological differences between seeing and hearing, and by analyzing both the case of John Cage and of jazz.  Especially jazz shows the extent to which improvisation is connected to the capacity to exploit the textural discrepancies between notes and sounds that go beyond specific musical notes (i.e., discrete and re-identifiable sounds, endowed with a name): it is the growl, the whine, the hard-hitting, edgy, raspy, coarse, harsh, guttural, hissing, screeching, broken, liquid, raucous - call it the grain of sound - that lends sound its affecting presence.http://journals.openedition.org/imagesrevues/417généalogieimprovisation musicalejazzoralité
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Davide Sparti
spellingShingle Davide Sparti
Dans le signe du son. Bruit, voix, corps et improvisation
Images Re-Vues
généalogie
improvisation musicale
jazz
oralité
author_facet Davide Sparti
author_sort Davide Sparti
title Dans le signe du son. Bruit, voix, corps et improvisation
title_short Dans le signe du son. Bruit, voix, corps et improvisation
title_full Dans le signe du son. Bruit, voix, corps et improvisation
title_fullStr Dans le signe du son. Bruit, voix, corps et improvisation
title_full_unstemmed Dans le signe du son. Bruit, voix, corps et improvisation
title_sort dans le signe du son. bruit, voix, corps et improvisation
publisher Centre d´Histoire et Théorie des Arts
series Images Re-Vues
issn 1778-3801
publishDate 2011-04-01
description Relying on Michel Foucault’s concept of genealogy, this paper offers two coupled thesis’ concerning improvisation in jazz.   The first is a historical diagnosis: once the notion of a musical «work» (written and through-composed) has become the aesthetic paradigm to evaluate music in general, the (oral) practice of improvisation has been marginalized.    The second thesis is that improvisation has been perceived as threatening because of the way it is connected to the «sounding bodies» of those who enact it.   Every language has an implicit phonetic code: some sounds are admitted (and admired), others are not.  In a culture that emphasizes the visual and the written, a sound which does not fit in a code (say as part of the chromatic segmentation), hence a sound deprived of a semantic function, becomes threatening.   This is shown by exploring the ontological differences between seeing and hearing, and by analyzing both the case of John Cage and of jazz.  Especially jazz shows the extent to which improvisation is connected to the capacity to exploit the textural discrepancies between notes and sounds that go beyond specific musical notes (i.e., discrete and re-identifiable sounds, endowed with a name): it is the growl, the whine, the hard-hitting, edgy, raspy, coarse, harsh, guttural, hissing, screeching, broken, liquid, raucous - call it the grain of sound - that lends sound its affecting presence.
topic généalogie
improvisation musicale
jazz
oralité
url http://journals.openedition.org/imagesrevues/417
work_keys_str_mv AT davidesparti danslesignedusonbruitvoixcorpsetimprovisation
_version_ 1725425636803084288