A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms

When we do not know how to correctly behave in a new context, the emotions that people familiar with the context show in response to the behaviors of others, can help us understand what to do or not to do. The present study examined cross-cultural differences in how group emotional expressions (ange...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shlomo eHareli, Konstantinos eKafetsios, Ursula eHess
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01501/full
id doaj-1e28f0b7cb134a48a52a3453fe304164
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e28f0b7cb134a48a52a3453fe3041642020-11-24T21:36:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-10-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01501152022A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social normsShlomo eHareli0Konstantinos eKafetsios1Ursula eHess2University of HaifaUniversity of CreteHumboldt Universität zu BerlinWhen we do not know how to correctly behave in a new context, the emotions that people familiar with the context show in response to the behaviors of others, can help us understand what to do or not to do. The present study examined cross-cultural differences in how group emotional expressions (anger, sadness, neutral) can be used to deduce a norm violation in four cultures (Germany, Israel, Greece and the US), which differ in terms of decoding rules for negative emotions. As expected, in all four countries, anger was a stronger norm violation signal than sadness or neutral expressions. However, angry and sad expressions were perceived as more intense and the relevant norm was learned better in Germany and Israel than in Greece and the US. Participants in Greece were relatively better at using sadness as a sign of a likely norm violation. The results demonstrate both cultural universality and cultural differences in the use of group emotion expressions in norm learning. In terms of cultural differences they underscore that the social signal value of emotional expressions may vary with culture as a function of cultural differences, both in emotion perception, and as a function of a differential use of emotions.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01501/fullSocial learningcross-cultural differencesSocial signalsNormative behaviorEmotion expressions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shlomo eHareli
Konstantinos eKafetsios
Ursula eHess
spellingShingle Shlomo eHareli
Konstantinos eKafetsios
Ursula eHess
A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms
Frontiers in Psychology
Social learning
cross-cultural differences
Social signals
Normative behavior
Emotion expressions
author_facet Shlomo eHareli
Konstantinos eKafetsios
Ursula eHess
author_sort Shlomo eHareli
title A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms
title_short A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms
title_full A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms
title_fullStr A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms
title_full_unstemmed A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms
title_sort cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-10-01
description When we do not know how to correctly behave in a new context, the emotions that people familiar with the context show in response to the behaviors of others, can help us understand what to do or not to do. The present study examined cross-cultural differences in how group emotional expressions (anger, sadness, neutral) can be used to deduce a norm violation in four cultures (Germany, Israel, Greece and the US), which differ in terms of decoding rules for negative emotions. As expected, in all four countries, anger was a stronger norm violation signal than sadness or neutral expressions. However, angry and sad expressions were perceived as more intense and the relevant norm was learned better in Germany and Israel than in Greece and the US. Participants in Greece were relatively better at using sadness as a sign of a likely norm violation. The results demonstrate both cultural universality and cultural differences in the use of group emotion expressions in norm learning. In terms of cultural differences they underscore that the social signal value of emotional expressions may vary with culture as a function of cultural differences, both in emotion perception, and as a function of a differential use of emotions.
topic Social learning
cross-cultural differences
Social signals
Normative behavior
Emotion expressions
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01501/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shlomoehareli acrossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms
AT konstantinosekafetsios acrossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms
AT ursulaehess acrossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms
AT shlomoehareli crossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms
AT konstantinosekafetsios crossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms
AT ursulaehess crossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms
_version_ 1725939142529908736