A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms
When we do not know how to correctly behave in a new context, the emotions that people familiar with the context show in response to the behaviors of others, can help us understand what to do or not to do. The present study examined cross-cultural differences in how group emotional expressions (ange...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01501/full |
id |
doaj-1e28f0b7cb134a48a52a3453fe304164 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1e28f0b7cb134a48a52a3453fe3041642020-11-24T21:36:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-10-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01501152022A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social normsShlomo eHareli0Konstantinos eKafetsios1Ursula eHess2University of HaifaUniversity of CreteHumboldt Universität zu BerlinWhen we do not know how to correctly behave in a new context, the emotions that people familiar with the context show in response to the behaviors of others, can help us understand what to do or not to do. The present study examined cross-cultural differences in how group emotional expressions (anger, sadness, neutral) can be used to deduce a norm violation in four cultures (Germany, Israel, Greece and the US), which differ in terms of decoding rules for negative emotions. As expected, in all four countries, anger was a stronger norm violation signal than sadness or neutral expressions. However, angry and sad expressions were perceived as more intense and the relevant norm was learned better in Germany and Israel than in Greece and the US. Participants in Greece were relatively better at using sadness as a sign of a likely norm violation. The results demonstrate both cultural universality and cultural differences in the use of group emotion expressions in norm learning. In terms of cultural differences they underscore that the social signal value of emotional expressions may vary with culture as a function of cultural differences, both in emotion perception, and as a function of a differential use of emotions.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01501/fullSocial learningcross-cultural differencesSocial signalsNormative behaviorEmotion expressions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shlomo eHareli Konstantinos eKafetsios Ursula eHess |
spellingShingle |
Shlomo eHareli Konstantinos eKafetsios Ursula eHess A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms Frontiers in Psychology Social learning cross-cultural differences Social signals Normative behavior Emotion expressions |
author_facet |
Shlomo eHareli Konstantinos eKafetsios Ursula eHess |
author_sort |
Shlomo eHareli |
title |
A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms |
title_short |
A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms |
title_full |
A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms |
title_fullStr |
A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms |
title_full_unstemmed |
A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms |
title_sort |
cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2015-10-01 |
description |
When we do not know how to correctly behave in a new context, the emotions that people familiar with the context show in response to the behaviors of others, can help us understand what to do or not to do. The present study examined cross-cultural differences in how group emotional expressions (anger, sadness, neutral) can be used to deduce a norm violation in four cultures (Germany, Israel, Greece and the US), which differ in terms of decoding rules for negative emotions. As expected, in all four countries, anger was a stronger norm violation signal than sadness or neutral expressions. However, angry and sad expressions were perceived as more intense and the relevant norm was learned better in Germany and Israel than in Greece and the US. Participants in Greece were relatively better at using sadness as a sign of a likely norm violation. The results demonstrate both cultural universality and cultural differences in the use of group emotion expressions in norm learning. In terms of cultural differences they underscore that the social signal value of emotional expressions may vary with culture as a function of cultural differences, both in emotion perception, and as a function of a differential use of emotions. |
topic |
Social learning cross-cultural differences Social signals Normative behavior Emotion expressions |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01501/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shlomoehareli acrossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms AT konstantinosekafetsios acrossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms AT ursulaehess acrossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms AT shlomoehareli crossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms AT konstantinosekafetsios crossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms AT ursulaehess crossculturalstudyonemotionexpressionandthelearningofsocialnorms |
_version_ |
1725939142529908736 |