EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC AND STATIC STRETCHING WITHIN GENERAL AND ACTIVITY SPECIFIC WARM-UP PROTOCOLS

The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of static and dynamic stretching protocols within general and activity specific warm-ups. Nine male and ten female subjects were tested under four warm-up conditions including a 1) general aerobic warm-up with static stretching, 2) general aerobi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Samson, Duane C. Button, Anis Chaouachi, David G. Behm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Uludag 2012-06-01
Series:Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jssm.org/vol11/n2/11/v11n2-11text.php
id doaj-1e2676ee65a84144a9d0cbb433be504f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e2676ee65a84144a9d0cbb433be504f2020-11-25T00:10:53ZengUniversity of UludagJournal of Sports Science and Medicine1303-29682012-06-01112279285EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC AND STATIC STRETCHING WITHIN GENERAL AND ACTIVITY SPECIFIC WARM-UP PROTOCOLSMichael SamsonDuane C. ButtonAnis ChaouachiDavid G. BehmThe purpose of the study was to determine the effects of static and dynamic stretching protocols within general and activity specific warm-ups. Nine male and ten female subjects were tested under four warm-up conditions including a 1) general aerobic warm-up with static stretching, 2) general aerobic warm-up with dynamic stretching, 3) general and specific warm-up with static stretching and 4) general and specific warm-up with dynamic stretching. Following all conditions, subjects were tested for movement time (kicking movement of leg over 0.5 m distance), countermovement jump height, sit and reach flexibility and 6 repetitions of 20 metre sprints. Results indicated that when a sport specific warm-up was included, there was an 0.94% improvement (p = 0.0013) in 20 meter sprint time with both the dynamic and static stretch groups. No such difference in sprint performance between dynamic and static stretch groups existed in the absence of the sport specific warm-up. The static stretch condition increased sit and reach range of motion (ROM) by 2.8% more (p = 0.0083) than the dynamic condition. These results would support the use of static stretching within an activity specific warm-up to ensure maximal ROM along with an enhancement in sprint performancehttp://www.jssm.org/vol11/n2/11/v11n2-11text.phpFlexibilitysports performancejumpsreaction time
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Samson
Duane C. Button
Anis Chaouachi
David G. Behm
spellingShingle Michael Samson
Duane C. Button
Anis Chaouachi
David G. Behm
EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC AND STATIC STRETCHING WITHIN GENERAL AND ACTIVITY SPECIFIC WARM-UP PROTOCOLS
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Flexibility
sports performance
jumps
reaction time
author_facet Michael Samson
Duane C. Button
Anis Chaouachi
David G. Behm
author_sort Michael Samson
title EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC AND STATIC STRETCHING WITHIN GENERAL AND ACTIVITY SPECIFIC WARM-UP PROTOCOLS
title_short EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC AND STATIC STRETCHING WITHIN GENERAL AND ACTIVITY SPECIFIC WARM-UP PROTOCOLS
title_full EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC AND STATIC STRETCHING WITHIN GENERAL AND ACTIVITY SPECIFIC WARM-UP PROTOCOLS
title_fullStr EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC AND STATIC STRETCHING WITHIN GENERAL AND ACTIVITY SPECIFIC WARM-UP PROTOCOLS
title_full_unstemmed EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC AND STATIC STRETCHING WITHIN GENERAL AND ACTIVITY SPECIFIC WARM-UP PROTOCOLS
title_sort effects of dynamic and static stretching within general and activity specific warm-up protocols
publisher University of Uludag
series Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
issn 1303-2968
publishDate 2012-06-01
description The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of static and dynamic stretching protocols within general and activity specific warm-ups. Nine male and ten female subjects were tested under four warm-up conditions including a 1) general aerobic warm-up with static stretching, 2) general aerobic warm-up with dynamic stretching, 3) general and specific warm-up with static stretching and 4) general and specific warm-up with dynamic stretching. Following all conditions, subjects were tested for movement time (kicking movement of leg over 0.5 m distance), countermovement jump height, sit and reach flexibility and 6 repetitions of 20 metre sprints. Results indicated that when a sport specific warm-up was included, there was an 0.94% improvement (p = 0.0013) in 20 meter sprint time with both the dynamic and static stretch groups. No such difference in sprint performance between dynamic and static stretch groups existed in the absence of the sport specific warm-up. The static stretch condition increased sit and reach range of motion (ROM) by 2.8% more (p = 0.0083) than the dynamic condition. These results would support the use of static stretching within an activity specific warm-up to ensure maximal ROM along with an enhancement in sprint performance
topic Flexibility
sports performance
jumps
reaction time
url http://www.jssm.org/vol11/n2/11/v11n2-11text.php
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelsamson effectsofdynamicandstaticstretchingwithingeneralandactivityspecificwarmupprotocols
AT duanecbutton effectsofdynamicandstaticstretchingwithingeneralandactivityspecificwarmupprotocols
AT anischaouachi effectsofdynamicandstaticstretchingwithingeneralandactivityspecificwarmupprotocols
AT davidgbehm effectsofdynamicandstaticstretchingwithingeneralandactivityspecificwarmupprotocols
_version_ 1725406438887522304