What makes a possible world physycally possible?
There is a widely extended viewpoint about physical possibility, what we will call Standard Approach, which holds that the physically possible is delimited by the nomological structure of physical theories: to be physically possible is to be in accordance with the physical laws, to be physically imp...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/61607 |
id |
doaj-1e19eb39e987420aaf9af5e9cceb4ea3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1e19eb39e987420aaf9af5e9cceb4ea32020-11-25T02:27:37ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaPrincipia: An International Journal of Epistemology1414-42471808-17112020-04-01241658810.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n1p6534159What makes a possible world physycally possible?Manuel Jesús Herrera Aros0Cristián Ariel López1Universidad de Buenos Aires/CONICETUniversidad de Buenos Aires/Université de Laussane/CONICETThere is a widely extended viewpoint about physical possibility, what we will call Standard Approach, which holds that the physically possible is delimited by the nomological structure of physical theories: to be physically possible is to be in accordance with the physical laws, to be physically impossible is to be prohibited by physical laws and to be physically necessary is to be demanded by the physical laws. However, it is possible to show that this approach is too relaxed and permissive when it comes to collecting and systematizing many of the modal intuitions present in the physical community. In this work we will argue, on the one hand, that the notion of physical possibility is more complex and richer than suggested by the standard approach and, on the other hand, that it is necessary to add some extra elements to the characterization of physical possibility in order to that it is adequate in scientific contexts.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/61607posibilidad físicateorías físicaspráctica científicacriterios extra-nómicos |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Manuel Jesús Herrera Aros Cristián Ariel López |
spellingShingle |
Manuel Jesús Herrera Aros Cristián Ariel López What makes a possible world physycally possible? Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology posibilidad física teorías físicas práctica científica criterios extra-nómicos |
author_facet |
Manuel Jesús Herrera Aros Cristián Ariel López |
author_sort |
Manuel Jesús Herrera Aros |
title |
What makes a possible world physycally possible? |
title_short |
What makes a possible world physycally possible? |
title_full |
What makes a possible world physycally possible? |
title_fullStr |
What makes a possible world physycally possible? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What makes a possible world physycally possible? |
title_sort |
what makes a possible world physycally possible? |
publisher |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
series |
Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
issn |
1414-4247 1808-1711 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
There is a widely extended viewpoint about physical possibility, what we will call Standard Approach, which holds that the physically possible is delimited by the nomological structure of physical theories: to be physically possible is to be in accordance with the physical laws, to be physically impossible is to be prohibited by physical laws and to be physically necessary is to be demanded by the physical laws. However, it is possible to show that this approach is too relaxed and permissive when it comes to collecting and systematizing many of the modal intuitions present in the physical community. In this work we will argue, on the one hand, that the notion of physical possibility is more complex and richer than suggested by the standard approach and, on the other hand, that it is necessary to add some extra elements to the characterization of physical possibility in order to that it is adequate in scientific contexts. |
topic |
posibilidad física teorías físicas práctica científica criterios extra-nómicos |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/61607 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT manueljesusherreraaros whatmakesapossibleworldphysycallypossible AT cristianariellopez whatmakesapossibleworldphysycallypossible |
_version_ |
1724841915495481344 |