Prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

Abstract This study evaluated the accuracy of total keratometry (TK) and standard keratometry (K) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes treated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The retrospective study included a retrospective analysis of data from 62 patients (91 eyes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soyoung Ryu, Ikhyun Jun, Tae-im Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo, Eung Kweon Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92354-1
id doaj-1e156ab580a14d8da17728d9845699df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e156ab580a14d8da17728d9845699df2021-06-20T11:32:27ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-011111910.1038/s41598-021-92354-1Prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgerySoyoung Ryu0Ikhyun Jun1Tae-im Kim2Kyoung Yul Seo3Eung Kweon Kim4Department of Ophthalmology, The Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Corneal Dystrophy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of MedicineAbstract This study evaluated the accuracy of total keratometry (TK) and standard keratometry (K) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes treated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The retrospective study included a retrospective analysis of data from 62 patients (91 eyes) who underwent uneventful femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with Artis PL E (Cristalens Industrie, Lannion, France) IOL implantation by a single surgeon between May 2020 and December 2020 in Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. The new IOLMaster 700 biometry device (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) was used to calculate TK and K. The mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentages of eyes within prediction errors of ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D were calculated for all IOL formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer-Q, Haigis, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and Barrett Universal II). There was strong agreement between K and TK (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99), with a mean difference of 0.04 D. For all formulas, MAE tended to be lower for TK than for K, and relatively lower MAE and MedAE values were observed for SRK/T and Holladay 1. Furthermore, for all formulas, a greater proportion of eyes fell within ± 0.25 D of the predicted postoperative spherical equivalent range in the TK group than in the K group. However, differences in MAEs, MedAEs, and percentages of eyes within the above prediction errors were not statistically significant. In conclusion, TK and K exhibit comparable performance for refractive prediction in eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92354-1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Soyoung Ryu
Ikhyun Jun
Tae-im Kim
Kyoung Yul Seo
Eung Kweon Kim
spellingShingle Soyoung Ryu
Ikhyun Jun
Tae-im Kim
Kyoung Yul Seo
Eung Kweon Kim
Prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
Scientific Reports
author_facet Soyoung Ryu
Ikhyun Jun
Tae-im Kim
Kyoung Yul Seo
Eung Kweon Kim
author_sort Soyoung Ryu
title Prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_short Prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_full Prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_fullStr Prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_sort prediction accuracy of conventional and total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract This study evaluated the accuracy of total keratometry (TK) and standard keratometry (K) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes treated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The retrospective study included a retrospective analysis of data from 62 patients (91 eyes) who underwent uneventful femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with Artis PL E (Cristalens Industrie, Lannion, France) IOL implantation by a single surgeon between May 2020 and December 2020 in Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. The new IOLMaster 700 biometry device (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) was used to calculate TK and K. The mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentages of eyes within prediction errors of ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D were calculated for all IOL formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer-Q, Haigis, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and Barrett Universal II). There was strong agreement between K and TK (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99), with a mean difference of 0.04 D. For all formulas, MAE tended to be lower for TK than for K, and relatively lower MAE and MedAE values were observed for SRK/T and Holladay 1. Furthermore, for all formulas, a greater proportion of eyes fell within ± 0.25 D of the predicted postoperative spherical equivalent range in the TK group than in the K group. However, differences in MAEs, MedAEs, and percentages of eyes within the above prediction errors were not statistically significant. In conclusion, TK and K exhibit comparable performance for refractive prediction in eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92354-1
work_keys_str_mv AT soyoungryu predictionaccuracyofconventionalandtotalkeratometryforintraocularlenspowercalculationinfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT ikhyunjun predictionaccuracyofconventionalandtotalkeratometryforintraocularlenspowercalculationinfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT taeimkim predictionaccuracyofconventionalandtotalkeratometryforintraocularlenspowercalculationinfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT kyoungyulseo predictionaccuracyofconventionalandtotalkeratometryforintraocularlenspowercalculationinfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT eungkweonkim predictionaccuracyofconventionalandtotalkeratometryforintraocularlenspowercalculationinfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
_version_ 1721369959899070464