An AHP-ISM approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decision

Recently, there has been a transparent need to involve public in transport development decisions not only in the EU but also in other countries worldwide. Public involvement in decision-making, however, suffers from two critical issues: lack of expertise and lack of enthusiasm. This paper aims to o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Szabolcs Duleba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2019-12-01
Series:Transport
Subjects:
AHP
ISM
Online Access:https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/Transport/article/view/9080
id doaj-1e07e3696ad941ea8a9a92f05dd4276c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e07e3696ad941ea8a9a92f05dd4276c2021-07-02T10:58:41ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityTransport1648-41421648-34802019-12-0134610.3846/transport.2019.9080An AHP-ISM approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decisionSzabolcs Duleba0Dept of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary Recently, there has been a transparent need to involve public in transport development decisions not only in the EU but also in other countries worldwide. Public involvement in decision-making, however, suffers from two critical issues: lack of expertise and lack of enthusiasm. This paper aims to overcome the first problem: how to amend passenger preferences related to public transport development with expert knowledge on transport systems. For this purpose, a new research methodology has been created which combines the well proven Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) methods in a novel way. ISM is used to reveal the non-hierarchical connections of the transport system elements and by this, AHP results are modified with the consideration of element interactions. The first stage of the three-stage-survey has been conducted in Yurihonjo (Japan), the second and third in an international workshop with the participation of experts. Results show that the original AHP scores – gained from passenger evaluations – are significantly modified by adding expert knowledge on factor interactions, thus new preference order is gained related to the importance of the development of public transport system elements. The introduced procedure can be applied for other public transport system improvement decision-making situations in which passenger involvement is required. First published online 18 March 2019 https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/Transport/article/view/9080AHPISMpassenger preferencesMCDMelement interactionspublic involvement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Szabolcs Duleba
spellingShingle Szabolcs Duleba
An AHP-ISM approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decision
Transport
AHP
ISM
passenger preferences
MCDM
element interactions
public involvement
author_facet Szabolcs Duleba
author_sort Szabolcs Duleba
title An AHP-ISM approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decision
title_short An AHP-ISM approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decision
title_full An AHP-ISM approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decision
title_fullStr An AHP-ISM approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decision
title_full_unstemmed An AHP-ISM approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decision
title_sort ahp-ism approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decision
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series Transport
issn 1648-4142
1648-3480
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Recently, there has been a transparent need to involve public in transport development decisions not only in the EU but also in other countries worldwide. Public involvement in decision-making, however, suffers from two critical issues: lack of expertise and lack of enthusiasm. This paper aims to overcome the first problem: how to amend passenger preferences related to public transport development with expert knowledge on transport systems. For this purpose, a new research methodology has been created which combines the well proven Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) methods in a novel way. ISM is used to reveal the non-hierarchical connections of the transport system elements and by this, AHP results are modified with the consideration of element interactions. The first stage of the three-stage-survey has been conducted in Yurihonjo (Japan), the second and third in an international workshop with the participation of experts. Results show that the original AHP scores – gained from passenger evaluations – are significantly modified by adding expert knowledge on factor interactions, thus new preference order is gained related to the importance of the development of public transport system elements. The introduced procedure can be applied for other public transport system improvement decision-making situations in which passenger involvement is required. First published online 18 March 2019
topic AHP
ISM
passenger preferences
MCDM
element interactions
public involvement
url https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/Transport/article/view/9080
work_keys_str_mv AT szabolcsduleba anahpismapproachforconsideringpublicpreferencesinapublictransportdevelopmentdecision
AT szabolcsduleba ahpismapproachforconsideringpublicpreferencesinapublictransportdevelopmentdecision
_version_ 1721331531463524352