Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literature
Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery (CESS) is now regularly performed in some centres in the Far East, yet rarely in Europe and the United States. This review describes the application of CESS through anterior and posterior approaches with analysis of the available evidence supporting current techniq...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018758520 |
id |
doaj-1e07238478d94d559ad0975e075c43c3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1e07238478d94d559ad0975e075c43c32020-11-25T03:45:06ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902018-02-012610.1177/2309499018758520Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literatureVittoria BucknallJN Alastair GibsonCervical endoscopic spinal surgery (CESS) is now regularly performed in some centres in the Far East, yet rarely in Europe and the United States. This review describes the application of CESS through anterior and posterior approaches with analysis of the available evidence supporting current techniques. An electronic literature search identified 52 papers and proceedings’ abstracts of which 25 (16 anterior approach and 9 posterior approach) provided comparable clinical outcomes. The results revealed a good or excellent outcome from CESS in 91% (range 74–100%) with a complication rate of 5%. In a local cohort study, patients had 72% less neck pain (visual analogue scale rating) and 81% less arm pain at 6 months when CESS was used as an isolated procedure, and 74% less neck pain and 83% less arm pain when coupled with disc replacement or fusion at an adjacent level.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018758520 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vittoria Bucknall JN Alastair Gibson |
spellingShingle |
Vittoria Bucknall JN Alastair Gibson Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literature Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
author_facet |
Vittoria Bucknall JN Alastair Gibson |
author_sort |
Vittoria Bucknall |
title |
Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literature |
title_short |
Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literature |
title_full |
Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literature |
title_fullStr |
Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literature |
title_sort |
cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: a review of the current literature |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
issn |
2309-4990 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery (CESS) is now regularly performed in some centres in the Far East, yet rarely in Europe and the United States. This review describes the application of CESS through anterior and posterior approaches with analysis of the available evidence supporting current techniques. An electronic literature search identified 52 papers and proceedings’ abstracts of which 25 (16 anterior approach and 9 posterior approach) provided comparable clinical outcomes. The results revealed a good or excellent outcome from CESS in 91% (range 74–100%) with a complication rate of 5%. In a local cohort study, patients had 72% less neck pain (visual analogue scale rating) and 81% less arm pain at 6 months when CESS was used as an isolated procedure, and 74% less neck pain and 83% less arm pain when coupled with disc replacement or fusion at an adjacent level. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018758520 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vittoriabucknall cervicalendoscopicspinalsurgeryareviewofthecurrentliterature AT jnalastairgibson cervicalendoscopicspinalsurgeryareviewofthecurrentliterature |
_version_ |
1724511358130585600 |