Comparison of virulence gene profiles and genomic fingerprints of Vibrio cholerae O1 and non-O1/non-O139 isolates from diarrheal patients in southern Thailand

• Main Authors: Sakrapee Tulatorn, Sutima Preeprem, Varaporn Vuddhakul, Pimonsri Mittraparp-arthorn
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2018-09-01
• Series: Tropical Medicine and Health
• Subjects: Molecular typing; Multi-locus variable-number of tandem-repeat analysis; Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; Vibrio cholerae; Virulence gene
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41182-018-0113-x

Abstract Background Vibrio cholerae is associated with severe watery diarrheal disease among people in many parts of the world, including the coastal provinces of Southern Thailand. There are relatively few studies focusing on the genetic characterization among V. cholerae isolates in this region. Therefore, this study aimed at exploring the presence of virulence genes and DNA fingerprints among V. cholerae O1 and non-O1/non-O139 isolates obtained from clinical samples in four southern coastal provinces during the period of 2001–2009 (n = 21). Results All V. cholerae O1 isolates possessed ctxA, tcpA, zot, ace, hlyA, and vasH genes. However, only hlyA, vcsV2, and vasH genes were detected in the majority of the non-O1/non-O139 isolates. All O1 isolates showed indistinguishable PCR fingerprints by arbitrarily primed (AP)-PCR and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)-PCR regardless of the geographical area and period of isolation. However, the multi-locus variable-number of tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) could differentiate these O1 isolates (n = 11) into eight profiles. Isolates exhibiting an undistinguished MLVA profile also showed identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). In addition, the O1 isolates were grouped into the same cluster by all methods used in this study. Conclusions This study demonstrated the presence of virulence genes and genetic diversity among different serogroups of V. cholerae isolates from clinical samples in southern Thailand. V. cholerae O1 isolated over a period of multiple years were genetically related, suggesting that they had a clonal origin, whereas non-O1/non-O139 isolates could have evolved independently.