Focus on Technologies: Worry or Technology?

The paper analyses different attitudes towards technologies in contemporary philosophical discourses. It points out that classical notion of technology formulated by Martin Heidegger seems to be more and more often questioned and even forgotten. As a result, it is being replaced by the theory of det...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saulius Kanišauskas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2015-10-01
Series:Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/cpc.2015.217
id doaj-1ded7cfeaf9c4962aaa5f9dd0f743cab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ded7cfeaf9c4962aaa5f9dd0f743cab2020-11-24T20:55:21ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversitySantalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija2029-63202029-63392015-10-0123213914810.3846/cpc.2015.217Focus on Technologies: Worry or Technology?Saulius Kanišauskas0Mykolas Romeris UniversityThe paper analyses different attitudes towards technologies in contemporary philosophical discourses. It points out that classical notion of technology formulated by Martin Heidegger seems to be more and more often questioned and even forgotten. As a result, it is being replaced by the theory of determinism, according to which the change of technologies determines the changes in social systems, the human being including. This happens this way and not vice versa. Nowadays technē, or “technika” (in English: technology) is mostly understood in the instrumental meaning or in the meaning of power. It is considered to be a powerful means, tool or mechanism to influence, change, control and manipulate human consciousness and human feelings. Despite the fact that technologies have already been tamed, the problem of huge responsibility for using and developing them arises. It is questioned whether the increasing society’s attention to modern technologies is not a particular “technology” of the postmodern capitalism to manipulate social consciousness. In parallel with “yes” answer to this question, Albert Borgmann’s idea that the causes of technological development have an ontological dimension, i.e. the causes are rooted in the nature of human beings themselves and their desire to adore own creativity, is discussed. Thus, it becomes necessary to probe deeper into the nature of creativity.http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/cpc.2015.217responsibilitycreativityfreedomtechnologiestechnological determinism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saulius Kanišauskas
spellingShingle Saulius Kanišauskas
Focus on Technologies: Worry or Technology?
Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija
responsibility
creativity
freedom
technologies
technological determinism
author_facet Saulius Kanišauskas
author_sort Saulius Kanišauskas
title Focus on Technologies: Worry or Technology?
title_short Focus on Technologies: Worry or Technology?
title_full Focus on Technologies: Worry or Technology?
title_fullStr Focus on Technologies: Worry or Technology?
title_full_unstemmed Focus on Technologies: Worry or Technology?
title_sort focus on technologies: worry or technology?
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija
issn 2029-6320
2029-6339
publishDate 2015-10-01
description The paper analyses different attitudes towards technologies in contemporary philosophical discourses. It points out that classical notion of technology formulated by Martin Heidegger seems to be more and more often questioned and even forgotten. As a result, it is being replaced by the theory of determinism, according to which the change of technologies determines the changes in social systems, the human being including. This happens this way and not vice versa. Nowadays technē, or “technika” (in English: technology) is mostly understood in the instrumental meaning or in the meaning of power. It is considered to be a powerful means, tool or mechanism to influence, change, control and manipulate human consciousness and human feelings. Despite the fact that technologies have already been tamed, the problem of huge responsibility for using and developing them arises. It is questioned whether the increasing society’s attention to modern technologies is not a particular “technology” of the postmodern capitalism to manipulate social consciousness. In parallel with “yes” answer to this question, Albert Borgmann’s idea that the causes of technological development have an ontological dimension, i.e. the causes are rooted in the nature of human beings themselves and their desire to adore own creativity, is discussed. Thus, it becomes necessary to probe deeper into the nature of creativity.
topic responsibility
creativity
freedom
technologies
technological determinism
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/cpc.2015.217
work_keys_str_mv AT sauliuskanisauskas focusontechnologiesworryortechnology
_version_ 1716791705825443840