Diagnostic utility of eight-channel EEG for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns

Objectives: To compare the diagnostic utility of electroencephalography (EEG) using reduced, 8-channel montage (rm-EEG) to full, 18-channel montage (fm-EEG) for detection of generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns (RPPs) by neurologists with extensive EEG training, neurolo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kapil Gururangan, Babak Razavi, Josef Parvizi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-01-01
Series:Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X18300106
id doaj-1dcc8a8dedc94813b93398e409e4cced
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1dcc8a8dedc94813b93398e409e4cced2020-11-24T21:49:55ZengElsevierClinical Neurophysiology Practice2467-981X2018-01-0136573Diagnostic utility of eight-channel EEG for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patternsKapil Gururangan0Babak Razavi1Josef Parvizi2Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USADepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USACorresponding author at: Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USAObjectives: To compare the diagnostic utility of electroencephalography (EEG) using reduced, 8-channel montage (rm-EEG) to full, 18-channel montage (fm-EEG) for detection of generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns (RPPs) by neurologists with extensive EEG training, neurology residents with minimal EEG exposure, and medical students without EEG experience. Methods: We presented EEG samples in both fm-EEG (bipolar montage) and rm-EEG (lateral leads of bipolar montage) to 20 neurologists, 20 residents, and 42 medical students. Unanimous agreement of three senior epileptologists defined samples as seizures (n = 7), RPPs (n = 10), and normal or slowing (n = 20). Differences in median accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Full and reduced EEG demonstrated similar accuracy when read by neurologists (fm-EEG: 95%, rm-EEG: 95%, p = 0.29), residents (fm-EEG: 80%, rm-EEG: 80%, p = 0.05), and students (fm-EEG: 60%, rm-EEG: 51%, p = 0.68). Moreover, neurologists’ sensitivity for detecting seizure activity was comparable between fm-EEG (100%) and rm-EEG (98%) (p = 0.17). Furthermore, the specificity of rm-EEG for seizures and RPP (neurologists: 100%, residents: 90%, students: 86%) was significantly greater than that of fm-EEG (neurologists: 93%, p = 0.03; residents: 80%, p = 0.01; students: 69%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The reduction of the number of EEG channels from 18 to 8 does not compromise neurologists’ sensitivity for detecting seizures that are often a core reason for performing urgent EEG. It may also increase their specificity for detecting rhythmic and periodic patterns, and thereby providing important diagnostic information to guide patient’s management. Significance: Our study is the first to document the utility of a reduced channel EEG above the hairline compared to full montage EEG in aiding medical staff with varying degrees of EEG training to detect generalized or hemispheric seizures. Keywords: Electroencephalography, Reduced channel montage, Seizure detection, Rhythmic and periodic patterns, Sensitivity, Specificityhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X18300106
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kapil Gururangan
Babak Razavi
Josef Parvizi
spellingShingle Kapil Gururangan
Babak Razavi
Josef Parvizi
Diagnostic utility of eight-channel EEG for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
author_facet Kapil Gururangan
Babak Razavi
Josef Parvizi
author_sort Kapil Gururangan
title Diagnostic utility of eight-channel EEG for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns
title_short Diagnostic utility of eight-channel EEG for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns
title_full Diagnostic utility of eight-channel EEG for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns
title_fullStr Diagnostic utility of eight-channel EEG for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic utility of eight-channel EEG for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns
title_sort diagnostic utility of eight-channel eeg for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns
publisher Elsevier
series Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
issn 2467-981X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Objectives: To compare the diagnostic utility of electroencephalography (EEG) using reduced, 8-channel montage (rm-EEG) to full, 18-channel montage (fm-EEG) for detection of generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns (RPPs) by neurologists with extensive EEG training, neurology residents with minimal EEG exposure, and medical students without EEG experience. Methods: We presented EEG samples in both fm-EEG (bipolar montage) and rm-EEG (lateral leads of bipolar montage) to 20 neurologists, 20 residents, and 42 medical students. Unanimous agreement of three senior epileptologists defined samples as seizures (n = 7), RPPs (n = 10), and normal or slowing (n = 20). Differences in median accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Full and reduced EEG demonstrated similar accuracy when read by neurologists (fm-EEG: 95%, rm-EEG: 95%, p = 0.29), residents (fm-EEG: 80%, rm-EEG: 80%, p = 0.05), and students (fm-EEG: 60%, rm-EEG: 51%, p = 0.68). Moreover, neurologists’ sensitivity for detecting seizure activity was comparable between fm-EEG (100%) and rm-EEG (98%) (p = 0.17). Furthermore, the specificity of rm-EEG for seizures and RPP (neurologists: 100%, residents: 90%, students: 86%) was significantly greater than that of fm-EEG (neurologists: 93%, p = 0.03; residents: 80%, p = 0.01; students: 69%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The reduction of the number of EEG channels from 18 to 8 does not compromise neurologists’ sensitivity for detecting seizures that are often a core reason for performing urgent EEG. It may also increase their specificity for detecting rhythmic and periodic patterns, and thereby providing important diagnostic information to guide patient’s management. Significance: Our study is the first to document the utility of a reduced channel EEG above the hairline compared to full montage EEG in aiding medical staff with varying degrees of EEG training to detect generalized or hemispheric seizures. Keywords: Electroencephalography, Reduced channel montage, Seizure detection, Rhythmic and periodic patterns, Sensitivity, Specificity
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X18300106
work_keys_str_mv AT kapilgururangan diagnosticutilityofeightchanneleegfordetectinggeneralizedorhemisphericseizuresandrhythmicperiodicpatterns
AT babakrazavi diagnosticutilityofeightchanneleegfordetectinggeneralizedorhemisphericseizuresandrhythmicperiodicpatterns
AT josefparvizi diagnosticutilityofeightchanneleegfordetectinggeneralizedorhemisphericseizuresandrhythmicperiodicpatterns
_version_ 1725886501076598784