Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands
Abstract While social vulnerability assessments (SVA) use spatial indicators and indices that have become state of the art, they also receive substantial critique. This article analyzes, by means of a literature review of 63 articles, if and in which aspects such an indicator approach is regarded as...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Disaster Risk Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-019-0213-1 |
id |
doaj-1dc9e792f8f04c7ea737f6e3b46a4655 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1dc9e792f8f04c7ea737f6e3b46a46552020-11-25T01:39:22ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science2095-00552192-63952019-03-0110222023210.1007/s13753-019-0213-1Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation DemandsAlexander Fekete0Institute of Rescue Engineering and Civil Protection, TH Köln - University of Applied SciencesAbstract While social vulnerability assessments (SVA) use spatial indicators and indices that have become state of the art, they also receive substantial critique. This article analyzes, by means of a literature review of 63 articles, if and in which aspects such an indicator approach is regarded as useful by scientific studies. The findings indicate a need for more research on the validation and justification of indicators. This article supports the conceptual development of SVA by adding to reflection about advancements and applications, but also shortcomings. The main advancement area discussed is validation and the demand for establishing benchmark criteria for vulnerability. Based on this, longitudinal monitoring of vulnerability and validation studies are conceivable based on existing SVA, but these efforts demand more conceptual development.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-019-0213-1Disaster riskIndicator selectionSocial vulnerability indexValidation criteriaVulnerability indicators |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alexander Fekete |
spellingShingle |
Alexander Fekete Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands International Journal of Disaster Risk Science Disaster risk Indicator selection Social vulnerability index Validation criteria Vulnerability indicators |
author_facet |
Alexander Fekete |
author_sort |
Alexander Fekete |
title |
Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands |
title_short |
Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands |
title_full |
Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands |
title_fullStr |
Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands |
title_sort |
social vulnerability (re-)assessment in context to natural hazards: review of the usefulness of the spatial indicator approach and investigations of validation demands |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science |
issn |
2095-0055 2192-6395 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
Abstract While social vulnerability assessments (SVA) use spatial indicators and indices that have become state of the art, they also receive substantial critique. This article analyzes, by means of a literature review of 63 articles, if and in which aspects such an indicator approach is regarded as useful by scientific studies. The findings indicate a need for more research on the validation and justification of indicators. This article supports the conceptual development of SVA by adding to reflection about advancements and applications, but also shortcomings. The main advancement area discussed is validation and the demand for establishing benchmark criteria for vulnerability. Based on this, longitudinal monitoring of vulnerability and validation studies are conceivable based on existing SVA, but these efforts demand more conceptual development. |
topic |
Disaster risk Indicator selection Social vulnerability index Validation criteria Vulnerability indicators |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-019-0213-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexanderfekete socialvulnerabilityreassessmentincontexttonaturalhazardsreviewoftheusefulnessofthespatialindicatorapproachandinvestigationsofvalidationdemands |
_version_ |
1725049283868098560 |