Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands

Abstract While social vulnerability assessments (SVA) use spatial indicators and indices that have become state of the art, they also receive substantial critique. This article analyzes, by means of a literature review of 63 articles, if and in which aspects such an indicator approach is regarded as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexander Fekete
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-03-01
Series:International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-019-0213-1
id doaj-1dc9e792f8f04c7ea737f6e3b46a4655
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1dc9e792f8f04c7ea737f6e3b46a46552020-11-25T01:39:22ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science2095-00552192-63952019-03-0110222023210.1007/s13753-019-0213-1Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation DemandsAlexander Fekete0Institute of Rescue Engineering and Civil Protection, TH Köln - University of Applied SciencesAbstract While social vulnerability assessments (SVA) use spatial indicators and indices that have become state of the art, they also receive substantial critique. This article analyzes, by means of a literature review of 63 articles, if and in which aspects such an indicator approach is regarded as useful by scientific studies. The findings indicate a need for more research on the validation and justification of indicators. This article supports the conceptual development of SVA by adding to reflection about advancements and applications, but also shortcomings. The main advancement area discussed is validation and the demand for establishing benchmark criteria for vulnerability. Based on this, longitudinal monitoring of vulnerability and validation studies are conceivable based on existing SVA, but these efforts demand more conceptual development.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-019-0213-1Disaster riskIndicator selectionSocial vulnerability indexValidation criteriaVulnerability indicators
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexander Fekete
spellingShingle Alexander Fekete
Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Disaster risk
Indicator selection
Social vulnerability index
Validation criteria
Vulnerability indicators
author_facet Alexander Fekete
author_sort Alexander Fekete
title Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands
title_short Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands
title_full Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands
title_fullStr Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands
title_full_unstemmed Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands
title_sort social vulnerability (re-)assessment in context to natural hazards: review of the usefulness of the spatial indicator approach and investigations of validation demands
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
issn 2095-0055
2192-6395
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Abstract While social vulnerability assessments (SVA) use spatial indicators and indices that have become state of the art, they also receive substantial critique. This article analyzes, by means of a literature review of 63 articles, if and in which aspects such an indicator approach is regarded as useful by scientific studies. The findings indicate a need for more research on the validation and justification of indicators. This article supports the conceptual development of SVA by adding to reflection about advancements and applications, but also shortcomings. The main advancement area discussed is validation and the demand for establishing benchmark criteria for vulnerability. Based on this, longitudinal monitoring of vulnerability and validation studies are conceivable based on existing SVA, but these efforts demand more conceptual development.
topic Disaster risk
Indicator selection
Social vulnerability index
Validation criteria
Vulnerability indicators
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-019-0213-1
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderfekete socialvulnerabilityreassessmentincontexttonaturalhazardsreviewoftheusefulnessofthespatialindicatorapproachandinvestigationsofvalidationdemands
_version_ 1725049283868098560