Method Bias in Cloze Tests as Reading Comprehension Measures

In many reading comprehension tests, different test formats are employed. Two commonly used test formats to measure reading comprehension are sustained passages followed by some questions and cloze items. Individual differences in handling test format peculiarities could constitute a source of score...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Purya Baghaei, Hamdollah Ravand
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-02-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832706
id doaj-1dc7118ccb0346b1be70bdea98ed54c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1dc7118ccb0346b1be70bdea98ed54c22020-11-25T03:01:43ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-02-01910.1177/2158244019832706Method Bias in Cloze Tests as Reading Comprehension MeasuresPurya Baghaei0Hamdollah Ravand1English Department, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, IranVali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, IranIn many reading comprehension tests, different test formats are employed. Two commonly used test formats to measure reading comprehension are sustained passages followed by some questions and cloze items. Individual differences in handling test format peculiarities could constitute a source of score variance. In this study, a bifactor Rasch model is applied to separate the cloze-specific variance in a reading comprehension test composed of sustained passages (plus questions) and a cloze passage. The results are compared with a unidimensional Rasch model where all items load on a single dimension. The inclusion of the cloze-specific dimension, that is, the method factor, improved the fit and resulted in substantially lower item difficulty estimates for the cloze items. Findings indicate that reading comprehension tests comprising sustained passages and cloze items are not unidimensional and contain a cloze-specific nuisance dimension that contaminates the latent construct variance.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832706
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Purya Baghaei
Hamdollah Ravand
spellingShingle Purya Baghaei
Hamdollah Ravand
Method Bias in Cloze Tests as Reading Comprehension Measures
SAGE Open
author_facet Purya Baghaei
Hamdollah Ravand
author_sort Purya Baghaei
title Method Bias in Cloze Tests as Reading Comprehension Measures
title_short Method Bias in Cloze Tests as Reading Comprehension Measures
title_full Method Bias in Cloze Tests as Reading Comprehension Measures
title_fullStr Method Bias in Cloze Tests as Reading Comprehension Measures
title_full_unstemmed Method Bias in Cloze Tests as Reading Comprehension Measures
title_sort method bias in cloze tests as reading comprehension measures
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2019-02-01
description In many reading comprehension tests, different test formats are employed. Two commonly used test formats to measure reading comprehension are sustained passages followed by some questions and cloze items. Individual differences in handling test format peculiarities could constitute a source of score variance. In this study, a bifactor Rasch model is applied to separate the cloze-specific variance in a reading comprehension test composed of sustained passages (plus questions) and a cloze passage. The results are compared with a unidimensional Rasch model where all items load on a single dimension. The inclusion of the cloze-specific dimension, that is, the method factor, improved the fit and resulted in substantially lower item difficulty estimates for the cloze items. Findings indicate that reading comprehension tests comprising sustained passages and cloze items are not unidimensional and contain a cloze-specific nuisance dimension that contaminates the latent construct variance.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832706
work_keys_str_mv AT puryabaghaei methodbiasinclozetestsasreadingcomprehensionmeasures
AT hamdollahravand methodbiasinclozetestsasreadingcomprehensionmeasures
_version_ 1724692407440637952