A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements
<p>We propose a method to assess the accuracy of atmospheric turbulence measurements performed by sonic anemometers and test it by analysis of measurements from two commonly used sonic anemometers, a Metek USA-1 and a Campbell CSAT3, at two locations in Denmark. The method relies on the estima...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
Online Access: | https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/237/2019/amt-12-237-2019.pdf |
id |
doaj-1dbc082687404917b0da3a2535faeb19 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1dbc082687404917b0da3a2535faeb192020-11-25T00:39:05ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482019-01-011223725210.5194/amt-12-237-2019A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurementsA. Peña0E. Dellwik1J. Mann2DTU Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, DenmarkDTU Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, DenmarkDTU Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark<p>We propose a method to assess the accuracy of atmospheric turbulence measurements performed by sonic anemometers and test it by analysis of measurements from two commonly used sonic anemometers, a Metek USA-1 and a Campbell CSAT3, at two locations in Denmark. The method relies on the estimation of the ratio of the vertical to the along-wind velocity power spectrum within the inertial subrange and does not require the use of another measurement as reference. When we correct the USA-1 to account for three-dimensional flow-distortion effects, as recommended by Metek GmbH, the ratio is very close to <span class="inline-formula">4∕3</span> as expected from Kolmogorov's hypothesis, whereas non-corrected data show a ratio close to 1. For the CSAT3, non-corrected data show a ratio close to 1.1 for the two sites and for wind directions where the instrument is not directly affected by the mast. After applying a previously suggested flow-distortion correction, the ratio increases up to <span class="inline-formula">≈1.2</span>, implying that the effect of flow distortion in this instrument is still not properly accounted for.</p>https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/237/2019/amt-12-237-2019.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
A. Peña E. Dellwik J. Mann |
spellingShingle |
A. Peña E. Dellwik J. Mann A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
author_facet |
A. Peña E. Dellwik J. Mann |
author_sort |
A. Peña |
title |
A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements |
title_short |
A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements |
title_full |
A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements |
title_fullStr |
A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements |
title_full_unstemmed |
A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements |
title_sort |
method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
issn |
1867-1381 1867-8548 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
<p>We propose a method to assess the accuracy of atmospheric turbulence
measurements performed by sonic anemometers and test it by analysis of
measurements from two commonly used sonic anemometers, a Metek USA-1 and a
Campbell CSAT3, at two locations in Denmark. The method relies on the
estimation of the ratio of the vertical to the along-wind velocity power
spectrum within the inertial subrange and does not require the use of another
measurement as reference. When we correct the USA-1 to account for
three-dimensional flow-distortion effects, as recommended by Metek GmbH, the
ratio is very close to <span class="inline-formula">4∕3</span> as expected from Kolmogorov's hypothesis, whereas
non-corrected data show a ratio close to 1. For the CSAT3, non-corrected data
show a ratio close to 1.1 for the two sites and for wind directions where the
instrument is not directly affected by the mast. After applying a previously
suggested flow-distortion correction, the ratio increases up to <span class="inline-formula">≈1.2</span>,
implying that the effect of flow distortion in this instrument is still not
properly accounted for.</p> |
url |
https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/237/2019/amt-12-237-2019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT apena amethodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements AT edellwik amethodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements AT jmann amethodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements AT apena methodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements AT edellwik methodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements AT jmann methodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements |
_version_ |
1725295121993302016 |