A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements

<p>We propose a method to assess the accuracy of atmospheric turbulence measurements performed by sonic anemometers and test it by analysis of measurements from two commonly used sonic anemometers, a Metek USA-1 and a Campbell CSAT3, at two locations in Denmark. The method relies on the estima...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Peña, E. Dellwik, J. Mann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/237/2019/amt-12-237-2019.pdf
id doaj-1dbc082687404917b0da3a2535faeb19
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1dbc082687404917b0da3a2535faeb192020-11-25T00:39:05ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482019-01-011223725210.5194/amt-12-237-2019A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurementsA. Peña0E. Dellwik1J. Mann2DTU Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, DenmarkDTU Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, DenmarkDTU Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark<p>We propose a method to assess the accuracy of atmospheric turbulence measurements performed by sonic anemometers and test it by analysis of measurements from two commonly used sonic anemometers, a Metek USA-1 and a Campbell CSAT3, at two locations in Denmark. The method relies on the estimation of the ratio of the vertical to the along-wind velocity power spectrum within the inertial subrange and does not require the use of another measurement as reference. When we correct the USA-1 to account for three-dimensional flow-distortion effects, as recommended by Metek GmbH, the ratio is very close to <span class="inline-formula">4∕3</span> as expected from Kolmogorov's hypothesis, whereas non-corrected data show a ratio close to 1. For the CSAT3, non-corrected data show a ratio close to 1.1 for the two sites and for wind directions where the instrument is not directly affected by the mast. After applying a previously suggested flow-distortion correction, the ratio increases up to <span class="inline-formula">≈1.2</span>, implying that the effect of flow distortion in this instrument is still not properly accounted for.</p>https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/237/2019/amt-12-237-2019.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Peña
E. Dellwik
J. Mann
spellingShingle A. Peña
E. Dellwik
J. Mann
A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet A. Peña
E. Dellwik
J. Mann
author_sort A. Peña
title A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements
title_short A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements
title_full A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements
title_fullStr A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements
title_full_unstemmed A method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements
title_sort method to assess the accuracy of sonic anemometer measurements
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2019-01-01
description <p>We propose a method to assess the accuracy of atmospheric turbulence measurements performed by sonic anemometers and test it by analysis of measurements from two commonly used sonic anemometers, a Metek USA-1 and a Campbell CSAT3, at two locations in Denmark. The method relies on the estimation of the ratio of the vertical to the along-wind velocity power spectrum within the inertial subrange and does not require the use of another measurement as reference. When we correct the USA-1 to account for three-dimensional flow-distortion effects, as recommended by Metek GmbH, the ratio is very close to <span class="inline-formula">4∕3</span> as expected from Kolmogorov's hypothesis, whereas non-corrected data show a ratio close to 1. For the CSAT3, non-corrected data show a ratio close to 1.1 for the two sites and for wind directions where the instrument is not directly affected by the mast. After applying a previously suggested flow-distortion correction, the ratio increases up to <span class="inline-formula">≈1.2</span>, implying that the effect of flow distortion in this instrument is still not properly accounted for.</p>
url https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/237/2019/amt-12-237-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT apena amethodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements
AT edellwik amethodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements
AT jmann amethodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements
AT apena methodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements
AT edellwik methodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements
AT jmann methodtoassesstheaccuracyofsonicanemometermeasurements
_version_ 1725295121993302016