Brown Bear and Human Recreational Use of Trails in Anchorage, Alaska
Anchorage, Alaska, has 301,000 human residents and hundreds of thousands of visitors each year. Anchorage also supports a viable population of brown bears (Ursus arctos). As a result, human–bear encounters are common. We used camera traps to monitor recreational trails near salmon spawning streams a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utah State University
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Human-Wildlife Interactions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol9/iss1/13 |
id |
doaj-1dba80e15b4f4062bc877dc1d1ff3d80 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1dba80e15b4f4062bc877dc1d1ff3d802020-11-25T03:57:24ZengUtah State UniversityHuman-Wildlife Interactions2155-38742155-38742017-02-019110.26077/wzyf-zz97Brown Bear and Human Recreational Use of Trails in Anchorage, AlaskaJessica A. Coltrane0Rick Sinnott1Alaska Department of Fish and GameAlaska Department of Fish and GameAnchorage, Alaska, has 301,000 human residents and hundreds of thousands of visitors each year. Anchorage also supports a viable population of brown bears (Ursus arctos). As a result, human–bear encounters are common. We used camera traps to monitor recreational trails near salmon spawning streams at 3 study sites during the summers of 2009 to 2012 to better understand daily and seasonal activity patterns of bears and humans on these trails. The more remote study sites had the least human activity and the most bear activity. Human–bear encounters were most likely to occur from July through early September due to a higher degree of overlap between human and bear activity during this timeframe. Most brown bears at our study sites appeared to have adopted a crepuscular and nocturnal activity pattern, which was more pronounced at the site with the most human use. More people used trails Friday through Sunday, while there was no difference in bear activity among other days of week. Recreational activities and user groups differed among sites. Based on our data, areas should be assessed individually to mitigate adverse human–bear encounters. However, a potential solution for avoiding dangerous bear encounters is to restrict human access or types of recreational activity. When human access is controlled in bear habitat, distribution of visitors becomes spatially and temporally more predictable, allowing bears an opportunity to adjust activity patterns to avoid people while still using the resource. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol9/iss1/13brown bearshuman–bear conflictsrecreational activityremote camerasursus arctos |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jessica A. Coltrane Rick Sinnott |
spellingShingle |
Jessica A. Coltrane Rick Sinnott Brown Bear and Human Recreational Use of Trails in Anchorage, Alaska Human-Wildlife Interactions brown bears human–bear conflicts recreational activity remote cameras ursus arctos |
author_facet |
Jessica A. Coltrane Rick Sinnott |
author_sort |
Jessica A. Coltrane |
title |
Brown Bear and Human Recreational Use of Trails in Anchorage, Alaska |
title_short |
Brown Bear and Human Recreational Use of Trails in Anchorage, Alaska |
title_full |
Brown Bear and Human Recreational Use of Trails in Anchorage, Alaska |
title_fullStr |
Brown Bear and Human Recreational Use of Trails in Anchorage, Alaska |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brown Bear and Human Recreational Use of Trails in Anchorage, Alaska |
title_sort |
brown bear and human recreational use of trails in anchorage, alaska |
publisher |
Utah State University |
series |
Human-Wildlife Interactions |
issn |
2155-3874 2155-3874 |
publishDate |
2017-02-01 |
description |
Anchorage, Alaska, has 301,000 human residents and hundreds of thousands of visitors each year. Anchorage also supports a viable population of brown bears (Ursus arctos). As a result, human–bear encounters are common. We used camera traps to monitor recreational trails near salmon spawning streams at 3 study sites during the summers of 2009 to 2012 to better understand daily and seasonal activity patterns of bears and humans on these trails. The more remote study sites had the least human activity and the most bear activity. Human–bear encounters were most likely to occur from July through early September due to a higher degree of overlap between human and bear activity during this timeframe. Most brown bears at our study sites appeared to have adopted a crepuscular and nocturnal activity pattern, which was more pronounced at the site with the most human use. More people used trails Friday through Sunday, while there was no difference in bear activity among other days of week. Recreational activities and user groups differed among sites. Based on our data, areas should be assessed individually to mitigate adverse human–bear encounters. However, a potential solution for avoiding dangerous bear encounters is to restrict human access or types of recreational activity. When human access is controlled in bear habitat, distribution of visitors becomes spatially and temporally more predictable, allowing bears an opportunity to adjust activity patterns to avoid people while still using the resource.
|
topic |
brown bears human–bear conflicts recreational activity remote cameras ursus arctos |
url |
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol9/iss1/13 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jessicaacoltrane brownbearandhumanrecreationaluseoftrailsinanchoragealaska AT ricksinnott brownbearandhumanrecreationaluseoftrailsinanchoragealaska |
_version_ |
1724461090050408448 |