Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences

In a previous study, we demonstrated that women enjoyed and tolerated lower meal loads than men. Hence, we hypothesized that with the same meal load, their postprandial response is more pronounced than in men. We performed a randomized parallel trial in 12 women and 12 men comparing the postprandial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugo Monrroy, Giulio Borghi, Teodora Pribic, Carmen Galan, Adoracion Nieto, Nuria Amigo, Anna Accarino, Xavier Correig, Fernando Azpiroz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/3/702
id doaj-1dacef268e444647b2d96528099143da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1dacef268e444647b2d96528099143da2020-11-24T20:41:56ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432019-03-0111370210.3390/nu11030702nu11030702Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender DifferencesHugo Monrroy0Giulio Borghi1Teodora Pribic2Carmen Galan3Adoracion Nieto4Nuria Amigo5Anna Accarino6Xavier Correig7Fernando Azpiroz8Digestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainDepartment of Experimental Medicine (Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section) “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, ItalyDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (Ciberdem), Metabolomics Platform, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Tarragona, SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (Ciberdem), Metabolomics Platform, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Tarragona, SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainIn a previous study, we demonstrated that women enjoyed and tolerated lower meal loads than men. Hence, we hypothesized that with the same meal load, their postprandial response is more pronounced than in men. We performed a randomized parallel trial in 12 women and 12 men comparing the postprandial responses to a palatable comfort meal. We measured homeostatic sensations (hunger/satiety, fullness) and hedonic sensations (digestive well-being, mood) on 10 cm scales, vagal tone by heart ratio variability and the metabolomic profile before and after meal ingestion. Gender differences were analyzed by repeated measures ANCOVA. Overall (<i>n</i> = 24), ingestion of the probe meal induced satiation, fullness, digestive well-being and improved mood (main time-effect <i>p</i> &#8804; 0.005 for all). Women exhibited a more intense sensory experience, specially more postprandial fullness, than men [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 7.14; <i>p</i> = 0.014]; hedonic responses in women also tended to be stronger than in men. Women exhibited more pronounced effects on vagal tone [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 5.5; <i>p</i> = 0.029] and a different lipoprotein response than men. In conclusion, our data indicate that gender influences the responses to meal ingestion, and these differences may explain the predisposition and higher incidence in women of meal-related functional disorders.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/3/702meal ingestiongender differencespostprandial sensationshedonic responsehomeostatic responsemetabolomic response
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hugo Monrroy
Giulio Borghi
Teodora Pribic
Carmen Galan
Adoracion Nieto
Nuria Amigo
Anna Accarino
Xavier Correig
Fernando Azpiroz
spellingShingle Hugo Monrroy
Giulio Borghi
Teodora Pribic
Carmen Galan
Adoracion Nieto
Nuria Amigo
Anna Accarino
Xavier Correig
Fernando Azpiroz
Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences
Nutrients
meal ingestion
gender differences
postprandial sensations
hedonic response
homeostatic response
metabolomic response
author_facet Hugo Monrroy
Giulio Borghi
Teodora Pribic
Carmen Galan
Adoracion Nieto
Nuria Amigo
Anna Accarino
Xavier Correig
Fernando Azpiroz
author_sort Hugo Monrroy
title Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences
title_short Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences
title_full Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences
title_fullStr Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences
title_full_unstemmed Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences
title_sort biological response to meal ingestion: gender differences
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2019-03-01
description In a previous study, we demonstrated that women enjoyed and tolerated lower meal loads than men. Hence, we hypothesized that with the same meal load, their postprandial response is more pronounced than in men. We performed a randomized parallel trial in 12 women and 12 men comparing the postprandial responses to a palatable comfort meal. We measured homeostatic sensations (hunger/satiety, fullness) and hedonic sensations (digestive well-being, mood) on 10 cm scales, vagal tone by heart ratio variability and the metabolomic profile before and after meal ingestion. Gender differences were analyzed by repeated measures ANCOVA. Overall (<i>n</i> = 24), ingestion of the probe meal induced satiation, fullness, digestive well-being and improved mood (main time-effect <i>p</i> &#8804; 0.005 for all). Women exhibited a more intense sensory experience, specially more postprandial fullness, than men [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 7.14; <i>p</i> = 0.014]; hedonic responses in women also tended to be stronger than in men. Women exhibited more pronounced effects on vagal tone [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 5.5; <i>p</i> = 0.029] and a different lipoprotein response than men. In conclusion, our data indicate that gender influences the responses to meal ingestion, and these differences may explain the predisposition and higher incidence in women of meal-related functional disorders.
topic meal ingestion
gender differences
postprandial sensations
hedonic response
homeostatic response
metabolomic response
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/3/702
work_keys_str_mv AT hugomonrroy biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences
AT giulioborghi biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences
AT teodorapribic biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences
AT carmengalan biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences
AT adoracionnieto biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences
AT nuriaamigo biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences
AT annaaccarino biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences
AT xaviercorreig biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences
AT fernandoazpiroz biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences
_version_ 1716823852377440256