Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences
In a previous study, we demonstrated that women enjoyed and tolerated lower meal loads than men. Hence, we hypothesized that with the same meal load, their postprandial response is more pronounced than in men. We performed a randomized parallel trial in 12 women and 12 men comparing the postprandial...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Nutrients |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/3/702 |
id |
doaj-1dacef268e444647b2d96528099143da |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1dacef268e444647b2d96528099143da2020-11-24T20:41:56ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432019-03-0111370210.3390/nu11030702nu11030702Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender DifferencesHugo Monrroy0Giulio Borghi1Teodora Pribic2Carmen Galan3Adoracion Nieto4Nuria Amigo5Anna Accarino6Xavier Correig7Fernando Azpiroz8Digestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainDepartment of Experimental Medicine (Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section) “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, ItalyDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (Ciberdem), Metabolomics Platform, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Tarragona, SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (Ciberdem), Metabolomics Platform, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Tarragona, SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), SpainIn a previous study, we demonstrated that women enjoyed and tolerated lower meal loads than men. Hence, we hypothesized that with the same meal load, their postprandial response is more pronounced than in men. We performed a randomized parallel trial in 12 women and 12 men comparing the postprandial responses to a palatable comfort meal. We measured homeostatic sensations (hunger/satiety, fullness) and hedonic sensations (digestive well-being, mood) on 10 cm scales, vagal tone by heart ratio variability and the metabolomic profile before and after meal ingestion. Gender differences were analyzed by repeated measures ANCOVA. Overall (<i>n</i> = 24), ingestion of the probe meal induced satiation, fullness, digestive well-being and improved mood (main time-effect <i>p</i> ≤ 0.005 for all). Women exhibited a more intense sensory experience, specially more postprandial fullness, than men [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 7.14; <i>p</i> = 0.014]; hedonic responses in women also tended to be stronger than in men. Women exhibited more pronounced effects on vagal tone [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 5.5; <i>p</i> = 0.029] and a different lipoprotein response than men. In conclusion, our data indicate that gender influences the responses to meal ingestion, and these differences may explain the predisposition and higher incidence in women of meal-related functional disorders.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/3/702meal ingestiongender differencespostprandial sensationshedonic responsehomeostatic responsemetabolomic response |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hugo Monrroy Giulio Borghi Teodora Pribic Carmen Galan Adoracion Nieto Nuria Amigo Anna Accarino Xavier Correig Fernando Azpiroz |
spellingShingle |
Hugo Monrroy Giulio Borghi Teodora Pribic Carmen Galan Adoracion Nieto Nuria Amigo Anna Accarino Xavier Correig Fernando Azpiroz Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences Nutrients meal ingestion gender differences postprandial sensations hedonic response homeostatic response metabolomic response |
author_facet |
Hugo Monrroy Giulio Borghi Teodora Pribic Carmen Galan Adoracion Nieto Nuria Amigo Anna Accarino Xavier Correig Fernando Azpiroz |
author_sort |
Hugo Monrroy |
title |
Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences |
title_short |
Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences |
title_full |
Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences |
title_fullStr |
Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biological Response to Meal Ingestion: Gender Differences |
title_sort |
biological response to meal ingestion: gender differences |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Nutrients |
issn |
2072-6643 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
In a previous study, we demonstrated that women enjoyed and tolerated lower meal loads than men. Hence, we hypothesized that with the same meal load, their postprandial response is more pronounced than in men. We performed a randomized parallel trial in 12 women and 12 men comparing the postprandial responses to a palatable comfort meal. We measured homeostatic sensations (hunger/satiety, fullness) and hedonic sensations (digestive well-being, mood) on 10 cm scales, vagal tone by heart ratio variability and the metabolomic profile before and after meal ingestion. Gender differences were analyzed by repeated measures ANCOVA. Overall (<i>n</i> = 24), ingestion of the probe meal induced satiation, fullness, digestive well-being and improved mood (main time-effect <i>p</i> ≤ 0.005 for all). Women exhibited a more intense sensory experience, specially more postprandial fullness, than men [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 7.14; <i>p</i> = 0.014]; hedonic responses in women also tended to be stronger than in men. Women exhibited more pronounced effects on vagal tone [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 5.5; <i>p</i> = 0.029] and a different lipoprotein response than men. In conclusion, our data indicate that gender influences the responses to meal ingestion, and these differences may explain the predisposition and higher incidence in women of meal-related functional disorders. |
topic |
meal ingestion gender differences postprandial sensations hedonic response homeostatic response metabolomic response |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/3/702 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hugomonrroy biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences AT giulioborghi biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences AT teodorapribic biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences AT carmengalan biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences AT adoracionnieto biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences AT nuriaamigo biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences AT annaaccarino biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences AT xaviercorreig biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences AT fernandoazpiroz biologicalresponsetomealingestiongenderdifferences |
_version_ |
1716823852377440256 |