Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control

Abstract To investigate the effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control. Surrogates of cervical motor control were active cervical range of motion (C-ROM) and joint position error (JPE) assessed in flexion, extension, lateroflexion and rotation directions in 49 healthy young men (mean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Rafique, Ursula Heggli, Denis Bron, David Colameo, Petra Schweinhardt, Jaap Swanenburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-09-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97786-3
id doaj-1dabac5556894634a6a4efc5ad30f9bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1dabac5556894634a6a4efc5ad30f9bd2021-09-26T11:26:48ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-09-011111810.1038/s41598-021-97786-3Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor controlDavid Rafique0Ursula Heggli1Denis Bron2David Colameo3Petra Schweinhardt4Jaap Swanenburg5Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University HospitalAeMC, Aeromedical Center, Swiss Air ForcesAeMC, Aeromedical Center, Swiss Air ForcesLaboratory of Systems Neuroscience, Department of Health Science and Technology, Institute for Neuroscience, ETHUniversity of ZurichUniversity of ZurichAbstract To investigate the effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control. Surrogates of cervical motor control were active cervical range of motion (C-ROM) and joint position error (JPE) assessed in flexion, extension, lateroflexion and rotation directions in 49 healthy young men (mean age: 20.2 years). All measurements were executed with 0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-kg axial loads. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of axial loading and cervical movement-direction on C-ROM and JPE. Post-hoc analysis was performed to compare load levels. Axial loading (p = 0.045) and movement direction (p < 0.001) showed significant main effects on C-ROM as well as an interaction (p < 0.001). C-ROM significantly changed with 3-kg axial load by decreaseing extension (− 13.6%) and increasing lateroflexion (+ 9.9%). No significant main effect was observed of axial loading on JPE (p = 0.139). Cervical motor control is influenced by axial loading, which results in decreased C-ROM in extension and increased C-ROM lateroflexion direction.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97786-3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Rafique
Ursula Heggli
Denis Bron
David Colameo
Petra Schweinhardt
Jaap Swanenburg
spellingShingle David Rafique
Ursula Heggli
Denis Bron
David Colameo
Petra Schweinhardt
Jaap Swanenburg
Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control
Scientific Reports
author_facet David Rafique
Ursula Heggli
Denis Bron
David Colameo
Petra Schweinhardt
Jaap Swanenburg
author_sort David Rafique
title Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control
title_short Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control
title_full Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control
title_fullStr Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control
title_full_unstemmed Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control
title_sort effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract To investigate the effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control. Surrogates of cervical motor control were active cervical range of motion (C-ROM) and joint position error (JPE) assessed in flexion, extension, lateroflexion and rotation directions in 49 healthy young men (mean age: 20.2 years). All measurements were executed with 0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-kg axial loads. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of axial loading and cervical movement-direction on C-ROM and JPE. Post-hoc analysis was performed to compare load levels. Axial loading (p = 0.045) and movement direction (p < 0.001) showed significant main effects on C-ROM as well as an interaction (p < 0.001). C-ROM significantly changed with 3-kg axial load by decreaseing extension (− 13.6%) and increasing lateroflexion (+ 9.9%). No significant main effect was observed of axial loading on JPE (p = 0.139). Cervical motor control is influenced by axial loading, which results in decreased C-ROM in extension and increased C-ROM lateroflexion direction.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97786-3
work_keys_str_mv AT davidrafique effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol
AT ursulaheggli effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol
AT denisbron effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol
AT davidcolameo effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol
AT petraschweinhardt effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol
AT jaapswanenburg effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol
_version_ 1716867992626659328