Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control
Abstract To investigate the effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control. Surrogates of cervical motor control were active cervical range of motion (C-ROM) and joint position error (JPE) assessed in flexion, extension, lateroflexion and rotation directions in 49 healthy young men (mean...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97786-3 |
id |
doaj-1dabac5556894634a6a4efc5ad30f9bd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1dabac5556894634a6a4efc5ad30f9bd2021-09-26T11:26:48ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-09-011111810.1038/s41598-021-97786-3Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor controlDavid Rafique0Ursula Heggli1Denis Bron2David Colameo3Petra Schweinhardt4Jaap Swanenburg5Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University HospitalAeMC, Aeromedical Center, Swiss Air ForcesAeMC, Aeromedical Center, Swiss Air ForcesLaboratory of Systems Neuroscience, Department of Health Science and Technology, Institute for Neuroscience, ETHUniversity of ZurichUniversity of ZurichAbstract To investigate the effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control. Surrogates of cervical motor control were active cervical range of motion (C-ROM) and joint position error (JPE) assessed in flexion, extension, lateroflexion and rotation directions in 49 healthy young men (mean age: 20.2 years). All measurements were executed with 0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-kg axial loads. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of axial loading and cervical movement-direction on C-ROM and JPE. Post-hoc analysis was performed to compare load levels. Axial loading (p = 0.045) and movement direction (p < 0.001) showed significant main effects on C-ROM as well as an interaction (p < 0.001). C-ROM significantly changed with 3-kg axial load by decreaseing extension (− 13.6%) and increasing lateroflexion (+ 9.9%). No significant main effect was observed of axial loading on JPE (p = 0.139). Cervical motor control is influenced by axial loading, which results in decreased C-ROM in extension and increased C-ROM lateroflexion direction.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97786-3 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David Rafique Ursula Heggli Denis Bron David Colameo Petra Schweinhardt Jaap Swanenburg |
spellingShingle |
David Rafique Ursula Heggli Denis Bron David Colameo Petra Schweinhardt Jaap Swanenburg Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
David Rafique Ursula Heggli Denis Bron David Colameo Petra Schweinhardt Jaap Swanenburg |
author_sort |
David Rafique |
title |
Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control |
title_short |
Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control |
title_full |
Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control |
title_fullStr |
Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control |
title_sort |
effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Abstract To investigate the effects of increasing axial load on cervical motor control. Surrogates of cervical motor control were active cervical range of motion (C-ROM) and joint position error (JPE) assessed in flexion, extension, lateroflexion and rotation directions in 49 healthy young men (mean age: 20.2 years). All measurements were executed with 0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-kg axial loads. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of axial loading and cervical movement-direction on C-ROM and JPE. Post-hoc analysis was performed to compare load levels. Axial loading (p = 0.045) and movement direction (p < 0.001) showed significant main effects on C-ROM as well as an interaction (p < 0.001). C-ROM significantly changed with 3-kg axial load by decreaseing extension (− 13.6%) and increasing lateroflexion (+ 9.9%). No significant main effect was observed of axial loading on JPE (p = 0.139). Cervical motor control is influenced by axial loading, which results in decreased C-ROM in extension and increased C-ROM lateroflexion direction. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97786-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidrafique effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol AT ursulaheggli effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol AT denisbron effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol AT davidcolameo effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol AT petraschweinhardt effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol AT jaapswanenburg effectsofincreasingaxialloadoncervicalmotorcontrol |
_version_ |
1716867992626659328 |