Institutional Identity
For some sufficiently long-standing institutions, such as the English Crown, there is no single thread, whether specified in terms of constitutive rules or assigned functions, that would connect the stages of that institution. Elizabeth II and Egbert are not connected by an unbroken chain of primoge...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Social Ontology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2018-0032 |
id |
doaj-1da5e02203884605a4b1afa6378767ff |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1da5e02203884605a4b1afa6378767ff2021-09-06T19:40:53ZengDe GruyterJournal of Social Ontology2196-96552196-96632019-09-0151133410.1515/jso-2018-0032jso-2018-0032Institutional IdentityRust Joshua0Stetson University, Department of Philosophy, DeLand, FL, USAFor some sufficiently long-standing institutions, such as the English Crown, there is no single thread, whether specified in terms of constitutive rules or assigned functions, that would connect the stages of that institution. Elizabeth II and Egbert are not connected by an unbroken chain of primogeniture and they have importantly different powers and functions. Derek Parfit famously sought to illuminate his account of personal identity by comparing a person to a club. If Parfit could use our intuitions about clubs to help motivate his neo-Lockean account of personal identity over time, which resists the idea that personal identity requires a common psychological thread, then I argue that an adapted version of his account of identity might, in turn, be reapplied to clubs and other institutions, such as the Crown.https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2018-0032identitysocial kindsinstitutionssocial ontologyparfit |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rust Joshua |
spellingShingle |
Rust Joshua Institutional Identity Journal of Social Ontology identity social kinds institutions social ontology parfit |
author_facet |
Rust Joshua |
author_sort |
Rust Joshua |
title |
Institutional Identity |
title_short |
Institutional Identity |
title_full |
Institutional Identity |
title_fullStr |
Institutional Identity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Institutional Identity |
title_sort |
institutional identity |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Journal of Social Ontology |
issn |
2196-9655 2196-9663 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
For some sufficiently long-standing institutions, such as the English Crown, there is no single thread, whether specified in terms of constitutive rules or assigned functions, that would connect the stages of that institution. Elizabeth II and Egbert are not connected by an unbroken chain of primogeniture and they have importantly different powers and functions. Derek Parfit famously sought to illuminate his account of personal identity by comparing a person to a club. If Parfit could use our intuitions about clubs to help motivate his neo-Lockean account of personal identity over time, which resists the idea that personal identity requires a common psychological thread, then I argue that an adapted version of his account of identity might, in turn, be reapplied to clubs and other institutions, such as the Crown. |
topic |
identity social kinds institutions social ontology parfit |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2018-0032 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rustjoshua institutionalidentity |
_version_ |
1717767551756271616 |