When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts
Abstract Background Missing data may seriously compromise inferences from randomised clinical trials, especially if missing data are not handled appropriately. The potential bias due to missing data depends on the mechanism causing the data to be missing, and the analytical methods applied to amend...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1 |
id |
doaj-1da0c2ef4e514b7fb7818310bd7e5a4e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1da0c2ef4e514b7fb7818310bd7e5a4e2020-11-25T01:46:55ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882017-12-0117111010.1186/s12874-017-0442-1When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowchartsJanus Christian Jakobsen0Christian Gluud1Jørn Wetterslev2Per Winkel3The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAbstract Background Missing data may seriously compromise inferences from randomised clinical trials, especially if missing data are not handled appropriately. The potential bias due to missing data depends on the mechanism causing the data to be missing, and the analytical methods applied to amend the missingness. Therefore, the analysis of trial data with missing values requires careful planning and attention. Methods The authors had several meetings and discussions considering optimal ways of handling missing data to minimise the bias potential. We also searched PubMed (key words: missing data; randomi*; statistical analysis) and reference lists of known studies for papers (theoretical papers; empirical studies; simulation studies; etc.) on how to deal with missing data when analysing randomised clinical trials. Results Handling missing data is an important, yet difficult and complex task when analysing results of randomised clinical trials. We consider how to optimise the handling of missing data during the planning stage of a randomised clinical trial and recommend analytical approaches which may prevent bias caused by unavoidable missing data. We consider the strengths and limitations of using of best-worst and worst-best sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation, and full information maximum likelihood. We also present practical flowcharts on how to deal with missing data and an overview of the steps that always need to be considered during the analysis stage of a trial. Conclusions We present a practical guide and flowcharts describing when and how multiple imputation should be used to handle missing data in randomised clinical.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1Missing dataRandomised clinical trialsMultiple imputation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Janus Christian Jakobsen Christian Gluud Jørn Wetterslev Per Winkel |
spellingShingle |
Janus Christian Jakobsen Christian Gluud Jørn Wetterslev Per Winkel When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts BMC Medical Research Methodology Missing data Randomised clinical trials Multiple imputation |
author_facet |
Janus Christian Jakobsen Christian Gluud Jørn Wetterslev Per Winkel |
author_sort |
Janus Christian Jakobsen |
title |
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts |
title_short |
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts |
title_full |
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts |
title_fullStr |
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts |
title_full_unstemmed |
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts |
title_sort |
when and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Research Methodology |
issn |
1471-2288 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Missing data may seriously compromise inferences from randomised clinical trials, especially if missing data are not handled appropriately. The potential bias due to missing data depends on the mechanism causing the data to be missing, and the analytical methods applied to amend the missingness. Therefore, the analysis of trial data with missing values requires careful planning and attention. Methods The authors had several meetings and discussions considering optimal ways of handling missing data to minimise the bias potential. We also searched PubMed (key words: missing data; randomi*; statistical analysis) and reference lists of known studies for papers (theoretical papers; empirical studies; simulation studies; etc.) on how to deal with missing data when analysing randomised clinical trials. Results Handling missing data is an important, yet difficult and complex task when analysing results of randomised clinical trials. We consider how to optimise the handling of missing data during the planning stage of a randomised clinical trial and recommend analytical approaches which may prevent bias caused by unavoidable missing data. We consider the strengths and limitations of using of best-worst and worst-best sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation, and full information maximum likelihood. We also present practical flowcharts on how to deal with missing data and an overview of the steps that always need to be considered during the analysis stage of a trial. Conclusions We present a practical guide and flowcharts describing when and how multiple imputation should be used to handle missing data in randomised clinical. |
topic |
Missing data Randomised clinical trials Multiple imputation |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT januschristianjakobsen whenandhowshouldmultipleimputationbeusedforhandlingmissingdatainrandomisedclinicaltrialsapracticalguidewithflowcharts AT christiangluud whenandhowshouldmultipleimputationbeusedforhandlingmissingdatainrandomisedclinicaltrialsapracticalguidewithflowcharts AT jørnwetterslev whenandhowshouldmultipleimputationbeusedforhandlingmissingdatainrandomisedclinicaltrialsapracticalguidewithflowcharts AT perwinkel whenandhowshouldmultipleimputationbeusedforhandlingmissingdatainrandomisedclinicaltrialsapracticalguidewithflowcharts |
_version_ |
1725017196162187264 |