Solar Field Mapping and Dynamo Behavior
We discuss the importance of the Sun’s large-scale magnetic field to the Sun-Planetary environment. This paper narrows its focus down to the motion and evolution of the photospheric large-scale magnetic field which affects many environments throughout this region. For this purpose we utilize a newly...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Astronomy |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/923578 |
id |
doaj-1d881cbfaefe489988e2ebe07a303125 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1d881cbfaefe489988e2ebe07a3031252020-11-24T21:09:06ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Astronomy1687-79691687-79772012-01-01201210.1155/2012/923578923578Solar Field Mapping and Dynamo BehaviorKenneth H. Schatten0Solar Physics, a.i. solutions, Inc., Suite 215, 10001 Derekwood Lane, Lanham, MD 20706, USAWe discuss the importance of the Sun’s large-scale magnetic field to the Sun-Planetary environment. This paper narrows its focus down to the motion and evolution of the photospheric large-scale magnetic field which affects many environments throughout this region. For this purpose we utilize a newly developed Netlogo cellular automata model. The domain of this algorithmic model is the Sun’s photosphere. Within this computational space are placed two types of entities or agents; one may refer to them as bluebirds and cardinals; the former carries outward magnetic flux and the latter carries out inward magnetic flux. One may simply call them blue and red agents. The agents provide a granularity with discrete changes not present in smooth MHD models; they undergo three processes: birth, motion, and death within the photospheric domain. We discuss these processes, as well as how we are able to develop a model that restricts its domain to the photosphere and allows the deeper layers to be considered only through boundary conditions. We show the model’s ability to mimic a number of photospheric magnetic phenomena: the solar cycle (11-year) oscillations, the Waldmeier effect, unipolar magnetic regions (e.g. sectors and coronal holes), Maunder minima, and the march/rush to the poles involving the geometry of magnetic field reversals. We also discuss why the Sun sometimes appears as a magnetic monopole, which of course requires no alteration of Maxwell’s equations.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/923578 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kenneth H. Schatten |
spellingShingle |
Kenneth H. Schatten Solar Field Mapping and Dynamo Behavior Advances in Astronomy |
author_facet |
Kenneth H. Schatten |
author_sort |
Kenneth H. Schatten |
title |
Solar Field Mapping and Dynamo Behavior |
title_short |
Solar Field Mapping and Dynamo Behavior |
title_full |
Solar Field Mapping and Dynamo Behavior |
title_fullStr |
Solar Field Mapping and Dynamo Behavior |
title_full_unstemmed |
Solar Field Mapping and Dynamo Behavior |
title_sort |
solar field mapping and dynamo behavior |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Advances in Astronomy |
issn |
1687-7969 1687-7977 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
We discuss the importance of the Sun’s large-scale magnetic field to the Sun-Planetary environment. This paper narrows its focus down to the motion and evolution of the photospheric large-scale magnetic field which affects many environments throughout this region. For this purpose we utilize a newly developed Netlogo cellular automata model. The domain of this algorithmic model is the Sun’s photosphere. Within this computational space are placed two types of entities or agents; one may refer to them as bluebirds and cardinals; the former carries outward magnetic flux and the latter carries out inward magnetic flux. One may simply call them blue and red agents. The agents provide a granularity with discrete changes not present in smooth MHD models;
they undergo three processes: birth, motion, and death within the photospheric domain. We discuss these processes, as well as how we are able to develop a model that restricts its domain to the photosphere and allows the deeper layers to be considered only through boundary conditions. We show the model’s ability to mimic a number of photospheric magnetic phenomena: the solar cycle (11-year) oscillations, the Waldmeier effect, unipolar magnetic regions (e.g. sectors and coronal holes), Maunder minima, and the march/rush to the poles involving the geometry of magnetic field reversals. We also discuss why the Sun sometimes appears as a magnetic monopole, which of course requires no alteration of Maxwell’s equations. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/923578 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kennethhschatten solarfieldmappinganddynamobehavior |
_version_ |
1716758589233692672 |