Eye trackers in evaluation of transformation of historical monuments. Revitalisation of the Dresden arsenal

The paper concentrates on the application of an eye tracker as a tool used to evaluate the successfulness of transformations of various historic monuments for modern purposes. An eye tracker as a device capable of registering the path of one’s gaze makes it possible to analyze the way in which peopl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rusnak Marta, Szewczyk Joanna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184900092
id doaj-1d86a68d849a4f06831cd1a74a80e107
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d86a68d849a4f06831cd1a74a80e1072021-02-02T01:49:06ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422018-01-01490009210.1051/e3sconf/20184900092e3sconf_solina2018_00092Eye trackers in evaluation of transformation of historical monuments. Revitalisation of the Dresden arsenalRusnak MartaSzewczyk JoannaThe paper concentrates on the application of an eye tracker as a tool used to evaluate the successfulness of transformations of various historic monuments for modern purposes. An eye tracker as a device capable of registering the path of one’s gaze makes it possible to analyze the way in which people perceive a given architectural object - in the case of this paper it is the former Dresden Arsenal, now known as the Bundeswehr Military History Museum. Since Daniel Libeskind, the architect behind the transformation, clearly defined the impression he what to achieve and the building provokes significant controversies, it was decided that it would be a suitable object for such a study. The survey was meant to find out whether the changes introduced by Libeskind actually helped him achieve the intended goal. The participants of the survey were shown images of the Arsenal’s façade from before the transformation, after the transformation in the daytime and after the transformation, but at night, with the illumination turned on. The paper not only shows and analyzes differences in the way people perceive these three images, but also raises a question as to the potential of eye trackers as tools used in architectural research.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184900092
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rusnak Marta
Szewczyk Joanna
spellingShingle Rusnak Marta
Szewczyk Joanna
Eye trackers in evaluation of transformation of historical monuments. Revitalisation of the Dresden arsenal
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Rusnak Marta
Szewczyk Joanna
author_sort Rusnak Marta
title Eye trackers in evaluation of transformation of historical monuments. Revitalisation of the Dresden arsenal
title_short Eye trackers in evaluation of transformation of historical monuments. Revitalisation of the Dresden arsenal
title_full Eye trackers in evaluation of transformation of historical monuments. Revitalisation of the Dresden arsenal
title_fullStr Eye trackers in evaluation of transformation of historical monuments. Revitalisation of the Dresden arsenal
title_full_unstemmed Eye trackers in evaluation of transformation of historical monuments. Revitalisation of the Dresden arsenal
title_sort eye trackers in evaluation of transformation of historical monuments. revitalisation of the dresden arsenal
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The paper concentrates on the application of an eye tracker as a tool used to evaluate the successfulness of transformations of various historic monuments for modern purposes. An eye tracker as a device capable of registering the path of one’s gaze makes it possible to analyze the way in which people perceive a given architectural object - in the case of this paper it is the former Dresden Arsenal, now known as the Bundeswehr Military History Museum. Since Daniel Libeskind, the architect behind the transformation, clearly defined the impression he what to achieve and the building provokes significant controversies, it was decided that it would be a suitable object for such a study. The survey was meant to find out whether the changes introduced by Libeskind actually helped him achieve the intended goal. The participants of the survey were shown images of the Arsenal’s façade from before the transformation, after the transformation in the daytime and after the transformation, but at night, with the illumination turned on. The paper not only shows and analyzes differences in the way people perceive these three images, but also raises a question as to the potential of eye trackers as tools used in architectural research.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184900092
work_keys_str_mv AT rusnakmarta eyetrackersinevaluationoftransformationofhistoricalmonumentsrevitalisationofthedresdenarsenal
AT szewczykjoanna eyetrackersinevaluationoftransformationofhistoricalmonumentsrevitalisationofthedresdenarsenal
_version_ 1724310972398567424