Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights
This essay analyses a corpus of online articles dealing with models’ rights collected in the press section of the “Model Alliance” website. The articles (about 60, plus the related blogs and forums) were originally published in various newspapers and magazines between 2010 and 2013, and they are an...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Iperstoria |
Online Access: | https://iperstoria.it/article/view/650 |
id |
doaj-1d836f91ec104e7cac444044d79d141f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1d836f91ec104e7cac444044d79d141f2021-03-03T10:14:36ZengDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of VeronaIperstoria2281-45822016-12-010810.13136/2281-4582/2016.i8.650557Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' RightsValentina AdamiMara LogaldoThis essay analyses a corpus of online articles dealing with models’ rights collected in the press section of the “Model Alliance” website. The articles (about 60, plus the related blogs and forums) were originally published in various newspapers and magazines between 2010 and 2013, and they are an interesting object of analysis for the linguist who intends to investigate how language is used to build up semantically and syntactically coherent forms of discourse about social and cultural issues that are perceived as yet “unexplored.” The analysis develops along two main lines: 1. a quantitative and qualitative lexical analysis based on semantic fields theory and discourse analysis, during which ten key topics (age, education, health, body, work, money, rights, law, sex, power) were identified and then grouped together into five semantic fields and 2. the use of semantic, morphological and rhetorical strategies, with particular emphasis on forms of negativization as well as on the use of modifiers, prefixes and suffixes. The study has confirmed the hypothesis that journalistic language needs to find a “voice” when dealing with new and contested topics. In fact, particularly in the first phase (2010-2012), journalistic discourses about models’ rights presented a more tentative style compared to more consolidated subjects covered in news reports.https://iperstoria.it/article/view/650 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Valentina Adami Mara Logaldo |
spellingShingle |
Valentina Adami Mara Logaldo Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights Iperstoria |
author_facet |
Valentina Adami Mara Logaldo |
author_sort |
Valentina Adami |
title |
Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights |
title_short |
Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights |
title_full |
Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights |
title_fullStr |
Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights |
title_full_unstemmed |
Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights |
title_sort |
not so pretty: discourses about models' rights |
publisher |
Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona |
series |
Iperstoria |
issn |
2281-4582 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
This essay analyses a corpus of online articles dealing with models’ rights collected in the press section of the “Model Alliance” website. The articles (about 60, plus the related blogs and forums) were originally published in various newspapers and magazines between 2010 and 2013, and they are an interesting object of analysis for the linguist who intends to investigate how language is used to build up semantically and syntactically coherent forms of discourse about social and cultural issues that are perceived as yet “unexplored.”
The analysis develops along two main lines: 1. a quantitative and qualitative lexical analysis based on semantic fields theory and discourse analysis, during which ten key topics (age, education, health, body, work, money, rights, law, sex, power) were identified and then grouped together into five semantic fields and 2. the use of semantic, morphological and rhetorical strategies, with particular emphasis on forms of negativization as well as on the use of modifiers, prefixes and suffixes. The study has confirmed the hypothesis that journalistic language needs to find a “voice” when dealing with new and contested topics. In fact, particularly in the first phase (2010-2012), journalistic discourses about models’ rights presented a more tentative style compared to more consolidated subjects covered in news reports. |
url |
https://iperstoria.it/article/view/650 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT valentinaadami notsoprettydiscoursesaboutmodelsrights AT maralogaldo notsoprettydiscoursesaboutmodelsrights |
_version_ |
1724232975403450368 |