Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights

This essay analyses a corpus of online articles dealing with models’ rights collected in the press section of the “Model Alliance” website. The articles (about 60, plus the related blogs and forums) were originally published in various newspapers and magazines between 2010 and 2013, and they are an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valentina Adami, Mara Logaldo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona 2016-12-01
Series:Iperstoria
Online Access:https://iperstoria.it/article/view/650
id doaj-1d836f91ec104e7cac444044d79d141f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d836f91ec104e7cac444044d79d141f2021-03-03T10:14:36ZengDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of VeronaIperstoria2281-45822016-12-010810.13136/2281-4582/2016.i8.650557Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' RightsValentina AdamiMara LogaldoThis essay analyses a corpus of online articles dealing with models’ rights collected in the press section of the “Model Alliance” website. The articles (about 60, plus the related blogs and forums) were originally published in various newspapers and magazines between 2010 and 2013, and they are an interesting object of analysis for the linguist who intends to investigate how language is used to build up semantically and syntactically coherent forms of discourse about social and cultural issues that are perceived as yet “unexplored.” The analysis develops along two main lines: 1. a quantitative and qualitative lexical analysis based on semantic fields theory and discourse analysis, during which ten key topics (age, education, health, body, work, money, rights, law, sex, power) were identified and then grouped together into five semantic fields and 2. the use of semantic, morphological and rhetorical strategies, with particular emphasis on forms of negativization as well as on the use of modifiers, prefixes and suffixes. The study has confirmed the hypothesis that journalistic language needs to find a “voice” when dealing with new and contested topics. In fact, particularly in the first phase (2010-2012), journalistic discourses about models’ rights presented a more tentative style compared to more consolidated subjects covered in news reports.https://iperstoria.it/article/view/650
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valentina Adami
Mara Logaldo
spellingShingle Valentina Adami
Mara Logaldo
Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights
Iperstoria
author_facet Valentina Adami
Mara Logaldo
author_sort Valentina Adami
title Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights
title_short Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights
title_full Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights
title_fullStr Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights
title_full_unstemmed Not So Pretty: Discourses About Models' Rights
title_sort not so pretty: discourses about models' rights
publisher Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona
series Iperstoria
issn 2281-4582
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This essay analyses a corpus of online articles dealing with models’ rights collected in the press section of the “Model Alliance” website. The articles (about 60, plus the related blogs and forums) were originally published in various newspapers and magazines between 2010 and 2013, and they are an interesting object of analysis for the linguist who intends to investigate how language is used to build up semantically and syntactically coherent forms of discourse about social and cultural issues that are perceived as yet “unexplored.” The analysis develops along two main lines: 1. a quantitative and qualitative lexical analysis based on semantic fields theory and discourse analysis, during which ten key topics (age, education, health, body, work, money, rights, law, sex, power) were identified and then grouped together into five semantic fields and 2. the use of semantic, morphological and rhetorical strategies, with particular emphasis on forms of negativization as well as on the use of modifiers, prefixes and suffixes. The study has confirmed the hypothesis that journalistic language needs to find a “voice” when dealing with new and contested topics. In fact, particularly in the first phase (2010-2012), journalistic discourses about models’ rights presented a more tentative style compared to more consolidated subjects covered in news reports.
url https://iperstoria.it/article/view/650
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinaadami notsoprettydiscoursesaboutmodelsrights
AT maralogaldo notsoprettydiscoursesaboutmodelsrights
_version_ 1724232975403450368