Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot

Aims: This study aims to determine whether giant cell tumor of bone of the foot (GCTB-F) is more aggressive than GCTB at other sites using data from a single institution. Patients and Methods: We reviewed all patients with GCTB seen by our Unit from 1993 to 2012. Patients with GCTB-F were compared w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannah L Co MD, Edward HM Wang MD MSc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-09-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018801168
id doaj-1d81ea146d404c4b83c4b5a9386b1bbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d81ea146d404c4b83c4b5a9386b1bbf2020-11-25T03:22:13ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902018-09-012610.1177/2309499018801168Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the footHannah L Co MDEdward HM Wang MD MScAims: This study aims to determine whether giant cell tumor of bone of the foot (GCTB-F) is more aggressive than GCTB at other sites using data from a single institution. Patients and Methods: We reviewed all patients with GCTB seen by our Unit from 1993 to 2012. Patients with GCTB-F were compared with all other patients with GCTB in terms of demographics and presentation. This group of GCTB-F was then compared with patients with GCTB of the appendicular skeleton (GCTB-AS) in terms of treatment and oncologic outcome at follow-up of at least 2 years. Results and conclusion: There were seven patients with GCTB-F (2.6%), most consulted over 12 months after symptoms. Compared to other GCTB ( n = 262), a bigger proportion of patients (28.5%) presented as recurrent lesions. All seven patients were classified as Campanacci III but none had lung metastasis at presentation or on follow-up. Compared to the group of 124 GCTB-AS, no GCTB-F patient received intralesional surgery. The 14% recurrence rate can be explained by contaminated non-intralesional surgery due to the advanced presentation and the technically challenging architecture of the foot. It would seem the aggressive tag of GCTB-F is not due to aggressive biologic behavior but to a combination of delayed presentation, delayed diagnosis, and difficult surgery.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018801168
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hannah L Co MD
Edward HM Wang MD MSc
spellingShingle Hannah L Co MD
Edward HM Wang MD MSc
Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Hannah L Co MD
Edward HM Wang MD MSc
author_sort Hannah L Co MD
title Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot
title_short Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot
title_full Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot
title_fullStr Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot
title_full_unstemmed Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot
title_sort giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Aims: This study aims to determine whether giant cell tumor of bone of the foot (GCTB-F) is more aggressive than GCTB at other sites using data from a single institution. Patients and Methods: We reviewed all patients with GCTB seen by our Unit from 1993 to 2012. Patients with GCTB-F were compared with all other patients with GCTB in terms of demographics and presentation. This group of GCTB-F was then compared with patients with GCTB of the appendicular skeleton (GCTB-AS) in terms of treatment and oncologic outcome at follow-up of at least 2 years. Results and conclusion: There were seven patients with GCTB-F (2.6%), most consulted over 12 months after symptoms. Compared to other GCTB ( n = 262), a bigger proportion of patients (28.5%) presented as recurrent lesions. All seven patients were classified as Campanacci III but none had lung metastasis at presentation or on follow-up. Compared to the group of 124 GCTB-AS, no GCTB-F patient received intralesional surgery. The 14% recurrence rate can be explained by contaminated non-intralesional surgery due to the advanced presentation and the technically challenging architecture of the foot. It would seem the aggressive tag of GCTB-F is not due to aggressive biologic behavior but to a combination of delayed presentation, delayed diagnosis, and difficult surgery.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018801168
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahlcomd giantcelltumorofthesmallbonesofthefoot
AT edwardhmwangmdmsc giantcelltumorofthesmallbonesofthefoot
_version_ 1724610576015949824