Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot
Aims: This study aims to determine whether giant cell tumor of bone of the foot (GCTB-F) is more aggressive than GCTB at other sites using data from a single institution. Patients and Methods: We reviewed all patients with GCTB seen by our Unit from 1993 to 2012. Patients with GCTB-F were compared w...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018801168 |
id |
doaj-1d81ea146d404c4b83c4b5a9386b1bbf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1d81ea146d404c4b83c4b5a9386b1bbf2020-11-25T03:22:13ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902018-09-012610.1177/2309499018801168Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the footHannah L Co MDEdward HM Wang MD MScAims: This study aims to determine whether giant cell tumor of bone of the foot (GCTB-F) is more aggressive than GCTB at other sites using data from a single institution. Patients and Methods: We reviewed all patients with GCTB seen by our Unit from 1993 to 2012. Patients with GCTB-F were compared with all other patients with GCTB in terms of demographics and presentation. This group of GCTB-F was then compared with patients with GCTB of the appendicular skeleton (GCTB-AS) in terms of treatment and oncologic outcome at follow-up of at least 2 years. Results and conclusion: There were seven patients with GCTB-F (2.6%), most consulted over 12 months after symptoms. Compared to other GCTB ( n = 262), a bigger proportion of patients (28.5%) presented as recurrent lesions. All seven patients were classified as Campanacci III but none had lung metastasis at presentation or on follow-up. Compared to the group of 124 GCTB-AS, no GCTB-F patient received intralesional surgery. The 14% recurrence rate can be explained by contaminated non-intralesional surgery due to the advanced presentation and the technically challenging architecture of the foot. It would seem the aggressive tag of GCTB-F is not due to aggressive biologic behavior but to a combination of delayed presentation, delayed diagnosis, and difficult surgery.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018801168 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hannah L Co MD Edward HM Wang MD MSc |
spellingShingle |
Hannah L Co MD Edward HM Wang MD MSc Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
author_facet |
Hannah L Co MD Edward HM Wang MD MSc |
author_sort |
Hannah L Co MD |
title |
Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot |
title_short |
Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot |
title_full |
Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot |
title_fullStr |
Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot |
title_full_unstemmed |
Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot |
title_sort |
giant cell tumor of the small bones of the foot |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
issn |
2309-4990 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
Aims: This study aims to determine whether giant cell tumor of bone of the foot (GCTB-F) is more aggressive than GCTB at other sites using data from a single institution. Patients and Methods: We reviewed all patients with GCTB seen by our Unit from 1993 to 2012. Patients with GCTB-F were compared with all other patients with GCTB in terms of demographics and presentation. This group of GCTB-F was then compared with patients with GCTB of the appendicular skeleton (GCTB-AS) in terms of treatment and oncologic outcome at follow-up of at least 2 years. Results and conclusion: There were seven patients with GCTB-F (2.6%), most consulted over 12 months after symptoms. Compared to other GCTB ( n = 262), a bigger proportion of patients (28.5%) presented as recurrent lesions. All seven patients were classified as Campanacci III but none had lung metastasis at presentation or on follow-up. Compared to the group of 124 GCTB-AS, no GCTB-F patient received intralesional surgery. The 14% recurrence rate can be explained by contaminated non-intralesional surgery due to the advanced presentation and the technically challenging architecture of the foot. It would seem the aggressive tag of GCTB-F is not due to aggressive biologic behavior but to a combination of delayed presentation, delayed diagnosis, and difficult surgery. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018801168 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hannahlcomd giantcelltumorofthesmallbonesofthefoot AT edwardhmwangmdmsc giantcelltumorofthesmallbonesofthefoot |
_version_ |
1724610576015949824 |