RadNet 1.0: exploring deep learning architectures for longwave radiative transfer

• Main Authors: Y. Liu, R. Caballero, J. M. Monteiro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-09-01
• Series: Geoscientific Model Development
• Online Access: https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/4399/2020/gmd-13-4399-2020.pdf
• ISSN: 1991-959X; 1991-9603

<p>Simulating global and regional climate at high resolution is essential to study the effects of climate change and capture extreme events affecting human populations. To achieve this goal, the scalability of climate models and efficiency of individual model components are both important. Radiative transfer is among the most computationally expensive components in a typical climate model. Here we attempt to model this component using a neural network. We aim to study the feasibility of replacing an explicit, physics-based computation of longwave radiative transfer by a neural network emulator and assessing the resultant performance gains. We compare multiple neural-network architectures, including a convolutional neural network, and our results suggest that the performance loss from the use of conventional convolutional networks is not offset by gains in accuracy. We train the networks with and without noise added to the input profiles and find that adding noise improves the ability of the networks to generalise beyond the training set. Prediction of radiative heating rates using our neural network models achieve up to 370<span class="inline-formula">×</span> speedup on a GTX 1080 GPU setup and 11<span class="inline-formula">×</span> speedup on a Xeon CPU setup compared to the a state-of-the-art radiative transfer library running on the same Xeon CPU. Furthermore, our neural network models yield less than 0.1&thinsp;K&thinsp;d<span class="inline-formula">⁻¹</span> mean squared error across all pressure levels. Upon introducing this component into a single-column model, we find that the time evolution of the temperature and humidity profiles is physically reasonable, though the model is conservative in its prediction of heating rates in regions where the optical depth changes quickly. Differences exist in the equilibrium climate simulated when using the neural network, which are attributed to small systematic errors that accumulate over time. Thus, we find that the accuracy of the neural network in the “offline” mode does not reflect its performance when coupled with other components.</p>