A Review and Classification of Assisted Living Systems
Europe’s social agenda for the “active elderly” is based upon a series of programs that provide a flexible infrastructure for their lives so that they are motivated, engaged in lifelong learning, and contributing to society. Economically speaking, Europe must engage in...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Information |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/9/7/182 |
id |
doaj-1d4ef61d7cd54d7fa74568780e03d2c4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1d4ef61d7cd54d7fa74568780e03d2c42020-11-25T01:41:02ZengMDPI AGInformation2078-24892018-07-019718210.3390/info9070182info9070182A Review and Classification of Assisted Living SystemsCaroline A. Byrne0Rem Collier1Gregory M. P. O’Hare2Department of Computing and Networking, Institute of Technology Carlow, Kilkenny Rd, R93 V960 Carlow, IrelandSchool of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin 4, IrelandSchool of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin 4, IrelandEurope’s social agenda for the “active elderly” is based upon a series of programs that provide a flexible infrastructure for their lives so that they are motivated, engaged in lifelong learning, and contributing to society. Economically speaking, Europe must engage in active aging research in order to avoid unsustainable health costs, and ambient assisted living (AAL) systems provide a platform for the elderly to remain living independently. This paper reviews research conducted within the area of AAL, and offers a taxonomy within which such systems may be classified. This classification distinguishes itself from others in that it categorises AAL systems in a top-down fashion, with the most important categories placed immediately to the left. In this paper, each section is explored further, and AAL systems are the focus. Entire AAL systems still cannot be fully evaluated, but their constituent technical parts can be assessed. The activities of daily living (ADLs) component was given further priority due to its potential for system evaluation, based on its ability to recognise ADLs with reasonable accuracy.http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/9/7/182assisted livingreviewclassification |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Caroline A. Byrne Rem Collier Gregory M. P. O’Hare |
spellingShingle |
Caroline A. Byrne Rem Collier Gregory M. P. O’Hare A Review and Classification of Assisted Living Systems Information assisted living review classification |
author_facet |
Caroline A. Byrne Rem Collier Gregory M. P. O’Hare |
author_sort |
Caroline A. Byrne |
title |
A Review and Classification of Assisted Living Systems |
title_short |
A Review and Classification of Assisted Living Systems |
title_full |
A Review and Classification of Assisted Living Systems |
title_fullStr |
A Review and Classification of Assisted Living Systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Review and Classification of Assisted Living Systems |
title_sort |
review and classification of assisted living systems |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Information |
issn |
2078-2489 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
Europe’s social agenda for the “active elderly” is based upon a series of programs that provide a flexible infrastructure for their lives so that they are motivated, engaged in lifelong learning, and contributing to society. Economically speaking, Europe must engage in active aging research in order to avoid unsustainable health costs, and ambient assisted living (AAL) systems provide a platform for the elderly to remain living independently. This paper reviews research conducted within the area of AAL, and offers a taxonomy within which such systems may be classified. This classification distinguishes itself from others in that it categorises AAL systems in a top-down fashion, with the most important categories placed immediately to the left. In this paper, each section is explored further, and AAL systems are the focus. Entire AAL systems still cannot be fully evaluated, but their constituent technical parts can be assessed. The activities of daily living (ADLs) component was given further priority due to its potential for system evaluation, based on its ability to recognise ADLs with reasonable accuracy. |
topic |
assisted living review classification |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/9/7/182 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carolineabyrne areviewandclassificationofassistedlivingsystems AT remcollier areviewandclassificationofassistedlivingsystems AT gregorympohare areviewandclassificationofassistedlivingsystems AT carolineabyrne reviewandclassificationofassistedlivingsystems AT remcollier reviewandclassificationofassistedlivingsystems AT gregorympohare reviewandclassificationofassistedlivingsystems |
_version_ |
1725042950869614592 |