Performance Comparison of Wavefront-Sensorless Adaptive Optics Systems by Using of the Focal Plane

The correction capability and the convergence speed of the wavefront-sensorless adaptive optics (AO) system are compared based on two different system control algorithms, which both use the information of focal plane. The first algorithm is designed through the linear relationship between the second...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huizhen Yang, Zhen Zhang, Jian Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:International Journal of Optics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/985351
id doaj-1d4e5a0a87004d97958298aefc53d56c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d4e5a0a87004d97958298aefc53d56c2020-11-24T23:21:35ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Optics1687-93841687-93922015-01-01201510.1155/2015/985351985351Performance Comparison of Wavefront-Sensorless Adaptive Optics Systems by Using of the Focal PlaneHuizhen Yang0Zhen Zhang1Jian Wu2School of Electronic Engineering, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Lianyungang 222005, ChinaSchool of Information and Electrical, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, ChinaSchool of Information and Electrical, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, ChinaThe correction capability and the convergence speed of the wavefront-sensorless adaptive optics (AO) system are compared based on two different system control algorithms, which both use the information of focal plane. The first algorithm is designed through the linear relationship between the second moment of the aberration gradients and the masked far-field intensity distribution and the second is stochastic parallel gradient descent (SPGD), which is the most commonly used algorithm in wavefront-sensorless AO systems. A wavefront-sensorless AO model is established with a 61-element deformable mirror (DM) and a CCD. Performance of the two control algorithms is investigated and compared through correcting different wavefront aberrations. Results show that the correction ability of AO system based on the proposed control algorithm is obviously better than that of AO system based on SPGD algorithm when the wavefront aberrations increase. The time needed by the proposed control algorithm is much less than that of SPGD when the AO system achieves similar correction results. Additionally, the convergence speed of the proposed control algorithm is independent of the turbulence strength while the number of intensity measurements needed by SPGD increases as the turbulence strength magnifies.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/985351
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Huizhen Yang
Zhen Zhang
Jian Wu
spellingShingle Huizhen Yang
Zhen Zhang
Jian Wu
Performance Comparison of Wavefront-Sensorless Adaptive Optics Systems by Using of the Focal Plane
International Journal of Optics
author_facet Huizhen Yang
Zhen Zhang
Jian Wu
author_sort Huizhen Yang
title Performance Comparison of Wavefront-Sensorless Adaptive Optics Systems by Using of the Focal Plane
title_short Performance Comparison of Wavefront-Sensorless Adaptive Optics Systems by Using of the Focal Plane
title_full Performance Comparison of Wavefront-Sensorless Adaptive Optics Systems by Using of the Focal Plane
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Wavefront-Sensorless Adaptive Optics Systems by Using of the Focal Plane
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Wavefront-Sensorless Adaptive Optics Systems by Using of the Focal Plane
title_sort performance comparison of wavefront-sensorless adaptive optics systems by using of the focal plane
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Optics
issn 1687-9384
1687-9392
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The correction capability and the convergence speed of the wavefront-sensorless adaptive optics (AO) system are compared based on two different system control algorithms, which both use the information of focal plane. The first algorithm is designed through the linear relationship between the second moment of the aberration gradients and the masked far-field intensity distribution and the second is stochastic parallel gradient descent (SPGD), which is the most commonly used algorithm in wavefront-sensorless AO systems. A wavefront-sensorless AO model is established with a 61-element deformable mirror (DM) and a CCD. Performance of the two control algorithms is investigated and compared through correcting different wavefront aberrations. Results show that the correction ability of AO system based on the proposed control algorithm is obviously better than that of AO system based on SPGD algorithm when the wavefront aberrations increase. The time needed by the proposed control algorithm is much less than that of SPGD when the AO system achieves similar correction results. Additionally, the convergence speed of the proposed control algorithm is independent of the turbulence strength while the number of intensity measurements needed by SPGD increases as the turbulence strength magnifies.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/985351
work_keys_str_mv AT huizhenyang performancecomparisonofwavefrontsensorlessadaptiveopticssystemsbyusingofthefocalplane
AT zhenzhang performancecomparisonofwavefrontsensorlessadaptiveopticssystemsbyusingofthefocalplane
AT jianwu performancecomparisonofwavefrontsensorlessadaptiveopticssystemsbyusingofthefocalplane
_version_ 1725571102022828032