Environmental Ethics and Responsibility

This paper resumes a previous discussion on Environmental Ethics and Irreversibility, which was presented in 2005. There I first faced the problem. Now I would like to reevaluate the issue. Was my paper “catastrophist”? Or was it, instead, realistic? Which are today the main issues confronting Envir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luiz Paulo Rouanet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2015-09-01
Series:Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/36415
id doaj-1d3adc10e55b47999ba929df1884e621
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d3adc10e55b47999ba929df1884e6212021-02-02T08:41:42ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaEthic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy1677-29542015-09-0114338239410.5007/1677-2954.2015v14n3p38225664Environmental Ethics and ResponsibilityLuiz Paulo Rouanet0UFSJThis paper resumes a previous discussion on Environmental Ethics and Irreversibility, which was presented in 2005. There I first faced the problem. Now I would like to reevaluate the issue. Was my paper “catastrophist”? Or was it, instead, realistic? Which are today the main issues confronting Environmental Ethics? Plainly speaking, what can we really do? These are some of the questions I would like to bring in to the debate with my colleagues and the public. In other words, instead of focusing in the aspect of “irreversibility”, I prefer here to focus on the “responsibility” of agents and institutions. It rescues the so-called “Principle of Responsibility”, by Hans Jonas. There is also some debate with Karl-Otto Appel and Habermas. If, on one hand, there are irreversible damages to nature, as the extinction of species and even of natural locations, as rivers and other natural accidents, there are, on the other hand, many actions that can and must be taken in order to preserve or deter the grave consequences of the environmental degradation. In this paper, I try to discuss some of the problems and propose some solutions, but the more important thing is to call everyone – individuals, groups, or institutions – to responsibility face the Earth, the Human and not-human beings, and mainly the future generations.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/36415environmental ethicsglobal ethicsresponsibilityirreversibility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luiz Paulo Rouanet
spellingShingle Luiz Paulo Rouanet
Environmental Ethics and Responsibility
Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy
environmental ethics
global ethics
responsibility
irreversibility
author_facet Luiz Paulo Rouanet
author_sort Luiz Paulo Rouanet
title Environmental Ethics and Responsibility
title_short Environmental Ethics and Responsibility
title_full Environmental Ethics and Responsibility
title_fullStr Environmental Ethics and Responsibility
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Ethics and Responsibility
title_sort environmental ethics and responsibility
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
series Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy
issn 1677-2954
publishDate 2015-09-01
description This paper resumes a previous discussion on Environmental Ethics and Irreversibility, which was presented in 2005. There I first faced the problem. Now I would like to reevaluate the issue. Was my paper “catastrophist”? Or was it, instead, realistic? Which are today the main issues confronting Environmental Ethics? Plainly speaking, what can we really do? These are some of the questions I would like to bring in to the debate with my colleagues and the public. In other words, instead of focusing in the aspect of “irreversibility”, I prefer here to focus on the “responsibility” of agents and institutions. It rescues the so-called “Principle of Responsibility”, by Hans Jonas. There is also some debate with Karl-Otto Appel and Habermas. If, on one hand, there are irreversible damages to nature, as the extinction of species and even of natural locations, as rivers and other natural accidents, there are, on the other hand, many actions that can and must be taken in order to preserve or deter the grave consequences of the environmental degradation. In this paper, I try to discuss some of the problems and propose some solutions, but the more important thing is to call everyone – individuals, groups, or institutions – to responsibility face the Earth, the Human and not-human beings, and mainly the future generations.
topic environmental ethics
global ethics
responsibility
irreversibility
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/36415
work_keys_str_mv AT luizpaulorouanet environmentalethicsandresponsibility
_version_ 1724296658029641728