Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
Abstract Rapid learning can be critical to ensure elite performance in a changing world or to recover basic movement after neural injuries. Recently it was shown that the variability of follow-through movements affects the rate of motor memory formation. Here we investigate if lead-in movement has a...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017-08-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05697-z |
id |
doaj-1d36c350e92a41f39eb35cfcc048a0d3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1d36c350e92a41f39eb35cfcc048a0d32020-12-08T03:05:27ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-08-017111210.1038/s41598-017-05697-zActive lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learningIan S. Howard0Christopher Ford1Angelo Cangelosi2David W. Franklin3Centre for Robotics and Neural Systems, School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of PlymouthCentre for Robotics and Neural Systems, School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of PlymouthCentre for Robotics and Neural Systems, School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of PlymouthNeuromuscular Diagnostics, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of MunichAbstract Rapid learning can be critical to ensure elite performance in a changing world or to recover basic movement after neural injuries. Recently it was shown that the variability of follow-through movements affects the rate of motor memory formation. Here we investigate if lead-in movement has a similar effect on learning rate. We hypothesized that both modality and variability of lead-in movement would play critical roles, with simulations suggesting that only changes in active lead-in variability would exhibit slower learning. We tested this experimentally using a two-movement paradigm, with either visual or active initial lead-in movements preceeding a second movement performed in a force field. As predicted, increasing active lead-in variability reduced the rate of motor adaptation, whereas changes in visual lead-in variability had little effect. This demonstrates that distinct neural tuning activity is induced by different lead-in modalities, subsequently influencing the access to, and switching between, distinct motor memories.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05697-z |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ian S. Howard Christopher Ford Angelo Cangelosi David W. Franklin |
spellingShingle |
Ian S. Howard Christopher Ford Angelo Cangelosi David W. Franklin Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Ian S. Howard Christopher Ford Angelo Cangelosi David W. Franklin |
author_sort |
Ian S. Howard |
title |
Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning |
title_short |
Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning |
title_full |
Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning |
title_fullStr |
Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning |
title_sort |
active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2017-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Rapid learning can be critical to ensure elite performance in a changing world or to recover basic movement after neural injuries. Recently it was shown that the variability of follow-through movements affects the rate of motor memory formation. Here we investigate if lead-in movement has a similar effect on learning rate. We hypothesized that both modality and variability of lead-in movement would play critical roles, with simulations suggesting that only changes in active lead-in variability would exhibit slower learning. We tested this experimentally using a two-movement paradigm, with either visual or active initial lead-in movements preceeding a second movement performed in a force field. As predicted, increasing active lead-in variability reduced the rate of motor adaptation, whereas changes in visual lead-in variability had little effect. This demonstrates that distinct neural tuning activity is induced by different lead-in modalities, subsequently influencing the access to, and switching between, distinct motor memories. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05697-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ianshoward activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning AT christopherford activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning AT angelocangelosi activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning AT davidwfranklin activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning |
_version_ |
1724392913594482688 |