Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning

Abstract Rapid learning can be critical to ensure elite performance in a changing world or to recover basic movement after neural injuries. Recently it was shown that the variability of follow-through movements affects the rate of motor memory formation. Here we investigate if lead-in movement has a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ian S. Howard, Christopher Ford, Angelo Cangelosi, David W. Franklin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05697-z
id doaj-1d36c350e92a41f39eb35cfcc048a0d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d36c350e92a41f39eb35cfcc048a0d32020-12-08T03:05:27ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-08-017111210.1038/s41598-017-05697-zActive lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learningIan S. Howard0Christopher Ford1Angelo Cangelosi2David W. Franklin3Centre for Robotics and Neural Systems, School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of PlymouthCentre for Robotics and Neural Systems, School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of PlymouthCentre for Robotics and Neural Systems, School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of PlymouthNeuromuscular Diagnostics, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of MunichAbstract Rapid learning can be critical to ensure elite performance in a changing world or to recover basic movement after neural injuries. Recently it was shown that the variability of follow-through movements affects the rate of motor memory formation. Here we investigate if lead-in movement has a similar effect on learning rate. We hypothesized that both modality and variability of lead-in movement would play critical roles, with simulations suggesting that only changes in active lead-in variability would exhibit slower learning. We tested this experimentally using a two-movement paradigm, with either visual or active initial lead-in movements preceeding a second movement performed in a force field. As predicted, increasing active lead-in variability reduced the rate of motor adaptation, whereas changes in visual lead-in variability had little effect. This demonstrates that distinct neural tuning activity is induced by different lead-in modalities, subsequently influencing the access to, and switching between, distinct motor memories.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05697-z
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ian S. Howard
Christopher Ford
Angelo Cangelosi
David W. Franklin
spellingShingle Ian S. Howard
Christopher Ford
Angelo Cangelosi
David W. Franklin
Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
Scientific Reports
author_facet Ian S. Howard
Christopher Ford
Angelo Cangelosi
David W. Franklin
author_sort Ian S. Howard
title Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_short Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_full Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_fullStr Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_full_unstemmed Active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
title_sort active lead-in variability affects motor memory formation and slows motor learning
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Abstract Rapid learning can be critical to ensure elite performance in a changing world or to recover basic movement after neural injuries. Recently it was shown that the variability of follow-through movements affects the rate of motor memory formation. Here we investigate if lead-in movement has a similar effect on learning rate. We hypothesized that both modality and variability of lead-in movement would play critical roles, with simulations suggesting that only changes in active lead-in variability would exhibit slower learning. We tested this experimentally using a two-movement paradigm, with either visual or active initial lead-in movements preceeding a second movement performed in a force field. As predicted, increasing active lead-in variability reduced the rate of motor adaptation, whereas changes in visual lead-in variability had little effect. This demonstrates that distinct neural tuning activity is induced by different lead-in modalities, subsequently influencing the access to, and switching between, distinct motor memories.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05697-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ianshoward activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning
AT christopherford activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning
AT angelocangelosi activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning
AT davidwfranklin activeleadinvariabilityaffectsmotormemoryformationandslowsmotorlearning
_version_ 1724392913594482688